Experimental Evaluation of the Optimum Lime Content and Strength Development of Lime-Stabilized Rammed Earth

Experimental Evaluation of the Optimum Lime Content and Strength Development of Lime-Stabilized Rammed Earth

Fernando Ávila Esther Puertas Rafael Gallego

Dept. of Structural Mechanics and Hydraulic Engineering, University of Granada, Spain

Page: 
239-248
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V9-N3-239-248
Received: 
N/A
|
Revised: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Available online: 
N/A
| Citation

© 2021 IIETA. This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

The increasing resource consumption, waste generation, and carbon footprint in the construction sector has drawn the attention of builders and researchers to alternative sustainable construction techniques and materials, such as rammed earth (RE). The mechanical behavior of RE is often enhanced through the use of diverse additives; although cement is probably the most common one, lime stabilization provides some important advantages, representing a more efficient and environmentally friendly solution with a long tradition in the improvement of the mechanical and hydraulic behavior of earthen materials. However, there are still several aspects regarding the effect of lime stabilization in RE mechanical properties that have not been thoroughly evaluated. In this regard, the present study analyze two of the main parameters concerning lime-stabilized rammed earth (LSRE), which are essential to ensure the correct use of this technique: the optimum lime content and the curing time. Several RE specimens with different lime contents, from 0 to 18% by weight, were manufactured and subjected to unconfined compression tests in order to obtain and compare their uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and elastic modulus. An optimum lime content equal to 12% was obtained. Then, more LSRE samples with 12% lime were manufactured and tested at increasing curing times during 100 days to evaluate the development of their strength and stiffness. The results showed a logarithmic growth of both the UCS and the elastic modulus, with the majority of the strength (over 80%) developed during the first 30 days. In addition, non-destructive ultrasonic pulse velocity tests were carried out on the samples, proving to be a useful tool for predicting the mechanical properties of the material without damaging the specimens. 

Keywords: 

lime stabilization, mechanical characterization, optimum lime content, rammed earth, strength development

  References

[1] Burroughs, S., Recommendations for the selection, stabilization, and compaction of soil for rammed earth wall construction. J Green Build, 5(1), pp. 101–14, 2010. https:// doi.org/10.3992/jgb.5.1.101

[2] Minke, G., Building with Earth: Design and Technology of a Sustainable Architecture. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser – Publishers for Architecture, 2006.

[3] Gandreau, D., Delboy, L. & CRATerre-ENSAG  (France),  UNESCO  World  heri- tage inventory of earthen architecture [Internet], 2012. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ ark:/48223/pf0000217020

[4] Alex, D., Recognition of a heritage in danger: Rammed-earth architecture in Lyon city, France. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, 143(1), 2018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755- 1315/143/1/012054

[5] Ciancio, D., Beckett, C.T.S., & Carraro, J.A.H., Optimum lime content identification for lime-stabilised rammed earth. Constr Build Mater, 53, pp. 59–65, 2014. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.077

[6] El Nabouch, R., Bui, Q.B., Plé, O. & Perrotin, P., Assessing the in-plane seismic per- formance of rammed earth walls by using horizontal loading tests. Eng Struct, 145, pp. 153–61, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.05.027

[7] Kang, S.-H., Kwon, Y.-H. & Moon, J., Quantitative analysis of CO2 uptake and mechanical properties of air lime-based materials. Energies, 12, p. 2093, 2019. https:// doi.org/10.3390/en12152903

[8] Edwards, A.J., Properties of Hydraulic and Non-Hydraulic Limes for Use in Construc- tion [Internet]. Napier University, 2005. https://www.napier.ac.uk/~/media/worktribe/ output-252838/edwardspdf.pdf

[9] El-Turki, A., Ball, R.J. & Allen, G.C., Carbonation of natural hydraulic lime (NHL) 3.5. In: Dhir, R.K., Harrison, T.A., Newlands, M.D., eds., Cement Combinations for Durable Concrete, Dundee, UK: Thomas Telford Ltd. pp. 300–308, 2005.

[10] Arrieta Baldovino, J. de J., dos Santos Izzo, R.L., Batista Moreira, E. & Lundgren Rose, J., Optimizing the evolution of strength for lime-stabilized rammed soil. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 11, pp. 882–91, 2019. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.10.008

[11] Bell, F.G., Lime stabilization of clay minerals and soils. Eng Geol, 42(4), pp. 223–237, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(96)00028-2

[12] Croft, J.B., The structures of soils stabilized with cementitious agents. Engineering Geolog, 2(2), pp. 63–80, 1967. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(67)90025-7

[13] Deep, G., Influence of lime and chicken mesh on compaction behaviour and strength properties of soil. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. matpr.2020.08.663

[14] Islam, S., Hoque, N.M.R., Hoque, M.A., Mishra, P.N., Mamun, M.M.H. & Dey, S., Strength development in fine-grained paddy field soil by lime addition. Journal of Build- ing Engineering, 26, pp. 100857, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100857

[15] Kariyawasam, K.K.G.K.D., & Jayasinghe, C., Cement stabilized rammed earth as a sustainable construction material. Construction and Building Materials, 105, pp. 519– 527, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.189

[16] Raavi, S.S.D., & Tripura, D.D., Predicting and evaluating the engineering properties of unstabilized and cement stabilized fibre reinforced rammed earth blocks. Construc- tion and Building Materials, 262, p. 120845, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuild- mat.2020.120845

[17] Raj, S., Sharma, A.K. & Anand, K.B., Performance appraisal of coal ash stabilized rammed earth. Journal of Building Engineering, 18, pp. 51–57, 2018. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.03.001

[18] Toufigh, V. & Kianfar, E., The effects of stabilizers on the thermal and the mechanical properties of rammed earth at various humidities and their environmental impacts. Con- struction and Building Materials, 200, pp. 616–629, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. conbuildmat.2018.12.050

[19] Da Rocha, C.G., Consoli, N.C. & Dalla Rosa Johann, A., Greening stabilized rammed earth: Devising more sustainable dosages based on strength controlling equations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 66, pp. 19–26, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2013.11.041

[20] Kosarimovahhed, M. & Toufigh, V., Sustainable usage of waste materials as stabilizer in rammed earth structures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 277, p. 123279, 2020. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123279

[21] El Nabouch, R., Mechanical behavior of rammed earth walls under Pushover tests [Inter- net]. Université Grenoble Alpes, 2017. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01707009/ document

[22] AENOR, UNE 103501: 1994 Geotecnia. Ensayo de compactación. Proctor modificado. Spain, 1994.

[23] Erdogmus, E. & Garcia, E., Study on the influence of stabilizer type and amount on the compressive strength of compressed stabilized earth block masonry. In: 12th North American Masonry Conference, Denver, Colorado, USA, 2015.

[24] Siddiqua, S. & Barreto, P.N.M., Chemical stabilization of rammed earth using calcium carbide residue and fly ash. Construction and Building Materials, 169, pp. 364–371, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.209

[25] Soudani, L., Modelling and experimental validation of the hygrothermal performances of earth as a building material [Internet]. Université de Lyon, France, 2016. https://hal. inria.fr/tel-01585348/

[26] Kashif Ur Rehman, S., Ibrahim, Z., Memon, S.A. & Jameel, M., Nondestructive test methods for concrete bridges: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 107, pp. 58–86, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.011

[27] Canivell, J., Martin-del-Rio, J.J., Alejandre, F.J., García-Heras, J. & Jimenez-Agui- lar, A., Considerations on the physical and mechanical properties of lime-stabilized rammed earth walls and their evaluation by ultrasonic pulse velocity testing. Construc- tion and Building Materials, 191, pp. 826–36, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuild- mat.2018.09.207

[28] Martín-del-Rio, J.J., Canivell, J. & Falcón, R.M., The use of non-destructive testing to evaluate the compressive strength of a lime-stabilised rammed-earth wall: Rebound index  and  ultrasonic  pulse  velocity.  Construction  and  Building  Materials, 242,  p. 118060 Contents, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118060

[29] Kianfar, E. & Toufigh, V., Reliability analysis of rammed earth structures. Construction and Building Materials, 127, pp. 884–95, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuild- mat.2016.10.052

[30] Ávila, F., Puertas, E. & Gallego, R., Characterization of the mechanical and physical properties of unstabilized rammed earth: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 270, p. 121435, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121435

[31] Xu, L., Wong, K.K., Fabbri, A., Champiré, F. & Branque, D., Loading-unloading shear behavior of rammed earth upon varying clay content and relative humidity conditions. Soils and Foundations, 58(4), pp. 1001–1015, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. sandf.2018.05.005

[32] Van Balen, K. & Van Gemert, D., Modelling lime mortar carbonation. Materials and Structures, 27(7), pp. 393–398, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02473442

[33] Khan, A., Gupta, R. & Garg, M., Determining material characteristics of “Rammed Earth” using non-destructive test methods for structural design. Structures, 20(May), pp. 399–410, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2019.05.003