# Assessment of Complex Variable Basis Functions in the Approximation of Ideal Fluid Flow Problems

Assessment of Complex Variable Basis Functions in the Approximation of Ideal Fluid Flow Problems

Bryce D. Wilkins T.V. Hromadka II Anthony N. Johnson Randy Boucher Howard D. Mcinvale Steve Horton

Department of Mathematical Sciences, United States Military Academy, USA

Page:
45-56
|
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V7-N1-45-56
N/A
|
Revised:
N/A
|
Accepted:
N/A
|
Available online:
N/A
| Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract:

Solving potential problems, such as those that occur in the analysis of steady-state heat transfer, electrostatics, ideal fluid flow, and groundwater flow, is important in several fields of engineering, science, and applied mathematics. Numerical solution of the relevant governing equations typically involves using techniques such as domain methods (including finite element, finite difference, or finite volume), or boundary element methods (using either real or complex variables). In this paper, the Complex Variable Boundary Element method (“CVBEM”) is examined with respect to the use of different types of basis functions in the CVBEM approximation function. Four basis function families are assessed in their solution success in modeling an important benchmark problem in ideal fluid flow; namely, flow around a 90 degree bend. Identical problem domains are used in the examination, and identical degrees of freedom are used in the CVBEM approximation functions. Further, a new computational modeling error is defined and used to compare the results herein; specifically, M = E / N where M is the proposed computational error measure, E is the maximum difference (in absolute value) between approximation and boundary condition value, and N is the number of degrees of freedom used in the approximation.

Keywords:

basis functions, Complex Variable Boundary Element Method (CVBEM), complex variables, computational fluid dynamics (CFD), flow nets, ideal fluid flow, Laplace equation

References

[1] Hromadka, T.V. & Lai, C., The Complex Variable Boundary Element Method. Springer- Verlag, New York, 1987.

[2] Hromadka, T.V. & Whitley, R.J., Approximating three-dimensional steady-state potential flow problems using two-dimensional complex polynomials. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 29, pp. 190–194, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2004.07.004

[3] Hromadka, T.V. & Whitley, R., Foundations of the Complex Variable Boundary Element Method. Springer, Berlin, 2014.

[4] Hromadka, T.V. & Whitley, R.J., Advances in the Complex Variable Boundary Element Method. Springer, New York, 1998.

[5] Hromadka, T. & Whitley, R., A new formulation for developing CVBEM approximation functions. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 18(1), pp. 39–41, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0955-7997(96)00027-6

[6] Dumir, P. & Kumar, R., Complex variable boundary element method for torsion of anisotropic bars. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 17(2), pp. 80–88, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1016/0307-904x(93)90096-y

[7] Hromadka, T.V. &  Pardoen,  G.C.,  Application  of  the  CVBEM  to  non-uniform  st. Venant torsion. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 53(2), pp. 149–161, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(85)90003-9

[8] Hromadka, T.V., A Multi-Dimensional Complex Variable Boundary Element Method, volume 40 of Topics in Engineering. WIT Press, Southampton and Boston, 2002.

[9] Johnson, A.N., Hromadka, T.V., Carroll, M., Hughes, M., Jones, L., Pappas, N., Thomasy, C., Horton, S., Whitley, R. & Johnson, M., A computational approach to determining CVBEM approximate boundaries. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 41, pp. 83–89, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2013.12.011

[10] Johnson, A.N., Hromadka, T.V., Hughes, M.T. & Horton, S.B., Modeling mixed boundary problems with the complex variable boundary element method (CVBEM) using matlab and mathematica. International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements, 3(3), pp. 269–278, 2015. https://doi.org/10.2495/cmem-v3-n3-269-278

[11] Barone, G., Pirrotta, A. & Santoro, R., Comparison among three boundary element methods for torsion problems: CPM, CVBEM, LEM. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 35(7), pp. 895–907, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2011.02.003

[12] Bohannon, A. & Hromadka, T., The complex polynomial method with a least-squares fit to boundary conditions. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 33(8–9), pp. 1100–1102, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2009.02.005

[13] Johnson, A.N. & Hromadka, T., Modeling mixed boundary conditions in a Hilbert space with the complex variable boundary element method (CVBEM). MethodsX, 2, pp. 292–305, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2015.05.005