Investigation of a Gas–Particle Flow with Particle–Particle and Particle–Wall Collisions by Immersed Boundary Method

Investigation of a Gas–Particle Flow with Particle–Particle and Particle–Wall Collisions by Immersed Boundary Method

Yusuke Mizuno Takuya Inoue Shun Takahashi Kota Fukuda 

Tokai University, Japan

Page: 
132-138
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V6-N1-132-138
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

We investigated gas–particle flows by using the three-dimensional incompressible Navier–Stokes equation with the immersed boundary method (IBM) to treat particles–wall collisions. We compared flow structures from the two-way coupled simulation with the one-way simulation that is usually used in the industrial simulation. In this study, all objectives, which are particles and walls, are defined by the level-set function for the ghost-cell method of the IBM. The proposed algorithms to represent particle–particle and particle–wall collisions are simple and stable for the coupling simulation. More- over, flow structures obtained with the coupled simulation of the moving, colliding and rebounding particles are in good agreement with the previous numerical and experimental results. The one-way and two-way coupling simulations were carried out based on a number of particles of 50, 100 and 200, respectively. As a result, the one-way scheme indicated more frequently collisions on the particle and wall than the two-way scheme. The reason is that the one-way scheme ignored the particle–flow interactions.

Keywords: 

immersed boundary method, particle–wall collisions

  References

[1] Nguyen, V.B., Poh, H.J. & Zhang, Y.W., Predicting shot peening coverage using multi- phase computational fluid dynamics simulations. Powder Technology, 256, pp. 100–112, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2014.01.097

[2] Morinishi, Y., Skew–symmetric form of convective terms and fully conservative finite difference schemes for variable density low–Mach number flows. Journal of Computa- tional Physics, 229, pp. 276–300, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2009.09.021

[3] Mizuno, Y., Takahashi, S., Nonomura, T., Nagata, T. & Fukuda, K., A simple immersed boundary method for compressible flow simulation around a stationary and moving sphere. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015, pp. 1–17, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/438086

[4] Kosinski, P. & Hoffmann, C.A., Extension of the hard-sphere particle-wall collision model to account for particle deposition. Physical Review E, 79, pp. 1–11, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.79.061302

[5] Kosinski, P. & Hoffmann, C.A., An extension of the hard–sphere particle–particle collision model to study agglomeration. Chemical Engineering Science, 65, pp. 3231–3239, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2010.02.012

[6] Eames, I. & Dalziel, S.B., Dust resuspension by the flow around an impacting sphere. Journal Fluid Mechanics, 403, pp. 305–328, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112099007120

[7] Vanella, M. & Balaras, E., A moving-least-squares reconstruction for embedded– boundary formulations. Journal of Computational Physics, 228, pp. 6617–6628, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2009.06.003