OPEN ACCESS
Wood is referred to as a material but in the true material sciences definition, a material is uniform, predictable, continuous, and reproducible. No two pieces of wood are the same even if they came from the same tree and the same board. Wood is better described as a composite and, more accurately, as a porous three-dimensional, hydroscopic, viscoelastic, anisotropic bio-polymer composite composed of an interconnecting matrix of cellulose, hemicelluloses, and lignin with minor amounts of inorganic elements and organic extractives. So, even solid wood is a composite. The characteristics we deal with at the solid wood level (swelling/shrinking, biological attack, and strength) are derived from the properties at the cell wall matrix and polymer level. Moisture sorption and desorption in the cell wall polymers results in dimensional instability and changing mechanical properties. Many different types of microorganisms recognize wood as a food source and are able to break it down resulting in both weight and strength losses. One technology that has now been commercialized to achieve high levels of stability, durability, and improved wet mechanical properties is acetylation: a reaction between the hydroxyl groups in the wood cell wall polymers and acetic anhydride. While all woods contain a low level of acetyl groups, increasing this acetyl content changes the properties and, thereby, the performance of the reacted wood. When a substantial number of the accessible hydroxyl groups are acetylated consistently across the entire cell wall, the wood reaches its highest level of stability and durability.
chemical modification, durable, hemicellulose, molecular level, performance, properties, shrinking, stable, strength, swelling, wood
[1] Rowell, R.M., Moisture Properties, Handbook of Wood Chemistry and Wood Composites,2nd edn., eds R.M. Rowell, CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, pp. 75–98, 2012.https://doi.org/10.1201/b12487-7
[2] Dent, R.W., A multilayer theory for gas sorption. Part I: Sorption of a single gas. TextileResearch Journal, 47(2), pp. 145–152, 1977.https://doi.org/10.1177/004051757704700213
[3] Caulfield, D.F., The effect of cellulose on the structure of water. In: Fibre-Water Interactionsin Paper-Making, Clowes and Sons, Ltd: London, England, 1978.
[4] Tiemann, H.D., Wood Technology, 2nd edn., Pitman Publishing Company: New YorkCity, NY, 1944.
[5] Stamm, A.J., Wood and Cellulose Science, The Ronald Press Company: New York, NY,p. 549, 1964.
[6] Jakes, J.E., Plaza, N., Stone, D.S., Hunt, C.G., Glass, S.V. & Zeliinka, S.L., Mechanismof transport through wood cell wall polymers. Journal of Forest Products and Industries,2(6), pp. 10–13, 2013.
[7] Alfredsen, G., Flæte, P.O. & Militz, H., Decay resistance of acetic anhydride modifiedwood–a review. International Wood Productions Journal, 4, pp. 137–143, 2013.https://doi.org/10.1179/2042645313Y.0000000034
[8] Alfredsen, G., Ringman, R., Pilga, A. & Fossdal, C.G., New insight regarding mode ofaction of brown rot decay of modified wood based on DNA and gene expression studies:a review. International Wood Products Journal, 6(1), pp. 5–7, 2015.https://doi.org/10.1179/2042645314Y.0000000085
[9] Ringman, R., Pilgard, A. & Richter, K., Effect of wood modification on gene expressionduring incipient Postia placenta decay. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation,86, pp. 86–91, 2014.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.09.002
[10] Fenton, H.J.H., Oxidation of tartaric acid in the presence of iron. Journal of the ChemicalSociety Transaction, 65, pp. 899–911, 1894.https://doi.org/10.1039/CT8946500899
[11] Goodell, B., Daniel, G., Jellison, J. & Qian, Y., Iron-reducing capacity of low molecularweightcompounds produced in wood by fungi. Holzforschung, 60, pp. 630–636, 2006.https://doi.org/10.1515/HF.2006.106
[12] Rowell, R.M., Acetylation of wood: A journey from analytical technique to commercialreality. Forest Products Journal, 56(9), pp. 4–12, 2006.https://doi.org/10.1080/17480270903261339
[13] Rowell, R.M., Ibach, R.E., McSweeny, J. & Nilsson, T., Understanding decay resistance,dimensional stability and strength changes in heat treated and acetylated wood.Wood Materials and Engineering, 1–2, pp. 14–22, 2009.
[14] Tarkow, H., Decay resistance of Acetylated Balsa. Madison, WI: USDA Forest Service,Forest Products Laboratory, p. 4, 1945.
[15] Tarkow, H., Stamm, A.J. & Erickson, E.C.O., Acetylated Wood. Report 1593, Madison,WI : USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, 1946.
[16] Wålinder, M., Segerholm, K., Larsson-Brelid, P. & Westin, M., Liquids and coatingswettability and penetrability of acetylated scots pine sapwood. In Proceedings 5thEuropean Conference on Wood Modification, Riga, Latvia, pp. 381–388, 2010.
[17] Rowell, R.M., Correlation between equilibrium moisture content and resistance todecay by brown-rot fungi on acetylated wood. In Proceedings: 8th European Conferenceon Wood Modification, October 26–27, Helsinki, Finland, 2015.
[18] Rowell, R.M., Role of cell wall specific moisture content on the brown-rot fungalattack on wood. 47th IRG Annual Meeting Lisbon, Portugal 15–19 May 2016, IRG/WP 16-40736, 2016.
[19] Rowell, R.M., Simonson, R., Hess, S., Plackett, D.V., Cronshaw, D. & Dunningham, E.,Acetyl distribution in acetylated whole wood and reactivity of isolated wood cell wallcomponents to acetic anhydride. Wood and Fiber Science, 26(1), pp. 11–18, 1994.
[20] Rowell, R.M., Distribution of reacted chemicals in southern pine modified with aceticanhydride. Wood Science, 15(2), pp. 172–182, 1982.
[21] Larsson-Brelid, P. & Westin, M., Acetylated wood—Results from long-term field tests.In Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Wood Modification, Cardiff, UK,pp. 71–78, 2007.
[22] Bongers, F., Creemers, J., Kattenbroek, B. & Homan, W., Performance of coatingson acetylated Scots pine after more than nine years outdoor exposure. In Proceedingsof the Second European Conference on Wood Modification, Göttingen, Germany, pp.125–129, 2005.
[23] Rowell, R.M. & Bongers, F., Coating acetylated wood. Coatings, 5, pp. 792–801, 2015.https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings5040792