Exploiting a Numerical Method to Translate Single Tooth Bending Fatigue Results into Meshing Gears Design Data: The Influence of Material Properties

Exploiting a Numerical Method to Translate Single Tooth Bending Fatigue Results into Meshing Gears Design Data: The Influence of Material Properties

F. Concli L. Maccioni L. Fraccaroli

Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bolzano, Italy

Available online: 
| Citation

© 2022 IIETA. This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).



According to standards, a fundamental gear design parameter, which heavily influences the sizing of these mechanical components, is the gear tooth root bending strength. To establish this parameter in a reliable way, tests should be performed on running gears (RG) manufactured with the same material and heat treatments under investigation. However, it is common practice in industry and in academia to perform single tooth bending fatigue (STBF) tests, which, on the one hand, are simpler and cheaper to perform, on the other hand, the stress history (cr (t )) they induce is not identical to that obtained during RG meshing. Therefore, it is necessary to apply a correction coefficient (fkorr) to translate data obtained via STBF in RG design data. In recent studies, a method to estimate fkorr  through the combination of finite element (FE) simulations and the implementation of multiaxial fatigue criteria (MFC) based on the critical plane concept has been proposed. This method consists of simulating through FE a gear geometry both in the RG load case and in the equivalent STBF condition. Through the load histories recorded on the nodes belonging to the critical area, it is possible, by implementing different MFC, to identify the most critical node and the relative Damage Parameter (DP). The ratio between the obtained critical DP of the STBF case and RG provides the value of fkorr. However, different MFC can lead to different results in terms of fkorr. This is because different MFC differs in the definition of the DP. More specifically, DPs are both functions of material properties, such as the fatigue limit of the material related to symmetric sinusoidal bending stresses (σf) and the fatigue limit at sinusoidal cyclic torsional stresses (τf), and load-dependent characteristics. The goal of this paper is to investigate the effect of different material properties, i.e. σ and τf , on the estimation of fkorr highlighting differences between the various MFC implemented, i.e. Findley, Matake, Papadopoulos, and Susmel et al. To this respect, the above-mentioned numerical method has been applied to a specific gear geometry whose material properties have been systematically varied. Results show that the criteria of Findley and Papadopoulus lead to very similar results and a monotonically increasing relationship between fkorand τf f . A similar trend is observed for the Susmel et al. criterion but with higher value of fkorr Differently, the criterion of Matake leads to a monotonic decreasing relationship between fkorr and τf f .


Critical plane, FEM, gears, material characterization, multiaxial fatigue, STBF


[1] Vullo, V., Gears. Springer International Publishing, 2020.

[2] Concli, F., Cortese, L., Vidoni, R., Nalli, F. & Carabin, G., A mixed FEM and lumped-parameter dynamic model for evaluating the modal properties of planetary gearboxes. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 32(7), pp. 3047–3056, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-018-0607-9

[3] Blake, J.W. & Cheng, H.S., A surface pitting life model for spur gears: Part I—Life prediction. J. Tribol, 113, pp. 712–718, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2920683

[4] Wu, S. & Cheng, H.S., Sliding wear calculation in spur gears. J. Tribol, 115, pp. 493–500, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2921665

[5] Li, S. & Kahraman, A., A scuffing model for spur gear contacts. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 156, p. 104161, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2020.104161

[6] Liu, H., Liu, H., Zhu, C. & Zhou, Y., A review on micropitting studies of steel gears. Coatings, 9(1), p. 42, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9010042

[7] Fernandes, P.J.L., Tooth bending fatigue failures in gears. Engineering Failure Analysis, 3(3), pp. 219–225, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/1350-6307(96)00008-8

[8] Hong, I.J., Kahraman, A. & Anderson, N., A rotating gear test methodology for evaluation of high-cycle tooth bending fatigue lives under fully reversed and fully released loading conditions. International Journal of Fatigue, 133, p. 105432, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105432

[9] Pantazopoulos, G.A., Bending fatigue failure of a helical pinion bevel gear. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 15(2), pp. 219–226, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-015-9947-2

[10] Bretl, N., Schurer, S., Tobie, T., Stahl, K. & Höhn, B.R., Investigations on tooth root bending strength of case hardened gears in the range of high cycle fatigue. In American Gear Manufacturers Association Fall Technical Meeting, pp. 103–118, 2013.

[11] ISO 6336-3:2006, Calculation of Load Capacity of Spur and Helical Gears, Part 3: Calculation of Tooth Bending Strength. Standard, Geneva, CH, 2006.

[12] ANSI/AGMA 2001-D04, Fundamental Rating Factors and Calculation Methods for Involute Spur and Helical Gear Teeth. American Gear Manufacturers Association, Alexandria, 2004.

[13] Rao, S.B. & McPherson, D.R., Experimental characterization of bending fatigue strength in gear teeth. Gear Technology, 20(1), pp. 25–32, 2003.

[14] Benedetti, M., Fontanari, V., Höhn, B.R., Oster, P. & Tobie, T., Influence of shot peening on bending tooth fatigue limit of case hardened gears. International Journal of Fatigue, 24(11), pp. 1127–1136, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-1123(02)00034-8

[15] McPherson, D.R. & Rao, S.B., Methodology for translating single-tooth bending fatigue data to be comparable to running gear data. Gear Technology, 42–51, 2008.

[16] Dobler, D.I.A., Hergesell, I.M. & Stahl, I.K., Increased tooth bending strength and pitting load capacity of fine-module gears. Gear Technology, 33(7), pp. 48–53, 2016.

[17] Concli, F., Tooth root bending strength of gears: dimensional effect for small gears having a module below 5 mm. Applied Science, 11, p. 2416, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052416

[18] Gorla, C., Conrado, E., Rosa, F. & Concli, F., Contact and bending fatigue behaviour of austempered ductile iron gears. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 232(6), pp. 998–1008, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406217695846

[19] McPherson, D.R. & Rao, S.B., Mechanical Testing of Gears. Materials Park, OH: ASM International, 2000, pp. 861–872.

[20] Concli, F., Fraccaroli, L. & Maccioni, L., Gear root bending strength: A new multiaxial approach to translate the results of single tooth bending fatigue tests to meshing gears. Metals, 11(6), p. 863, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11060863

[21] Concli, F., Maccioni, L., Fraccaroli, L. & Cappellini, C., Effect of gear design parameters on stress histories induced by different tooth bending fatigue tests: a numerical-statistical investigation. Applied Sciences, 12(8), p. 3950, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12083950

[22] Rettig, H., Ermittlung von Zahnfußfestigkeitskennwerten auf Verspannungsprüfständen und Pulsatoren-Vergleich der Prüfverfahren und der gewonnenen Kennwerte. Antriebstechnik, 26, pp. 51–55, 1987.

[23] Stahl, K., Lebensdauer Statistik: Abschlussbericht, Forschungsvorhaben nr. 304. Tech. Rep. 580, 1999.

[24] Concli, F., Austempered Ductile Iron (ADI) for gears: Contact and bending fatigue behavior. Procedia Structural Integrity, 8, pp. 14–23, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2017.12.003

[25] Bonaiti, L., Concli, F., Gorla, C. & Rosa, F., Bending fatigue behaviour of 17-4 PH gears produced via selective laser melting. Procedia Structural Integrity, 24, pp. 764–774, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2020.02.068

[26] Gasparini, G., Mariani, U., Gorla, C., Filippini, M. & Rosa, F., Bending 367 Fatigue Tests of Helicopter Case Carburized Gears: Influence of Material, Design 368 and Manufacturing Parameters. In AGMA (Ed.), American Gear Manufacturers Association 369 (AGMA) Fall Technical Meeting, 2008, pp. 131–142.

[27] Gorla, C., Rosa, F., Concli, F. & Albertini, H., Bending fatigue strength of innovative gear materials for wind turbines gearboxes: Effect of surface coatings. In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2012, Vol. 45233, pp. 3141–3147. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2012-86513

[28] Gorla, C., Rosa, F., Conrado, E. & Concli, F., Bending fatigue strength of case carburized and nitrided gear steels for aeronautical applications. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 12(21), pp. 11306–11322, 2017.

[29] Rao, S.B., Schwanger, V., McPherson, D.R. & Rudd, C., Measurement and validation of dynamic bending stresses in spur gear teeth. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 2005, Vol. 4742, pp. 755–764. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2005-84419

[30] Wagner, M., Isaacson, A., Knox, K. & Hylton, T., Single tooth bending fatigue testing at any r ratio. In 2020 AGMA/ABMA Annual Meeting. AGMA American Gear Manufacturers Association, 2020.

[31] Bonaiti, L., Bayoumi, A.B.M., Concli, F., Rosa, F. & Gorla, C., Gear root bending strength: a comparison between Single Tooth Bending Fatigue Tests and meshing gears. Journal of Mechanical Design, pp. 1–17, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4050560

[32] Hong, I., Teaford, Z. & Kahraman, A., A comparison of gear tooth bending fatigue lives from single tooth bending and rotating gear tests. Forschung im Ingenieurwesen, pp. 1–13, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10010-021-00510-w

[33] Conrado, E., Gorla, C., Davoli, P. & Boniardi, M., A comparison of bending fatigue strength of carburized and nitrided gears for industrial applications. Engineering Failure Analysis, 78, pp. 41–54, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.03.006

[34] Savaria, V., Bridier, F. & Bocher, P., Predicting the effects of material properties gradient and residual stresses on the bending fatigue strength of induction hardened aeronautical gears. International Journal of Fatigue, 85, pp. 70–84, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.12.004

[35] Crossland, B., Effect of large hydrostatic pressures on the torsional fatigue strength of an alloy steel. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Fatigue of Metals. Institution of Mechanical Engineers London, 1956, Vol. 138, pp. 12–12.

[36] Hotait, M.A. & Kahraman, A., Estimation of bending fatigue life of hypoid gears using a multiaxial fatigue criterion. Journal of Mechanical Design, 135(10), p. 101005, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4025024

[37] Liu, Y. & Mahadevan, S., A unified multiaxial fatigue damage model for isotropic and anisotropic materials. International Journal of Fatigue, 29(2), pp. 347–359, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.03.011

[38] Findley, W.N., A theory for the effect of mean stress on fatigue of metals under combined torsion and axial load or bending. Journal of Engineering for Industry, 81(4), pp. 301–305. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4008327

[39] Concli, F., Maccioni, L. & Bonaiti, L., Reliable gear design: Translation of the results of single tooth bending fatigue tests through the combination of numerical simulations and fatigue criteria. Wit Transactions on Engineering Sciences, 130, pp. 111–122, 2021. https://doi.org/10.2495/cmem210101

[40] Matake, T., An explanation on fatigue limit under combined stress. Bulletin of JSME, 20(141), pp. 257–263, 1977. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsme1958.20.257

[41] McDiarmid, D.L., Fatigue under out-of-phase biaxial stresses of different frequencies. In Multiaxial Fatigue. ASTM International, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP36245S

[42] Papadopoulos, I.V., A high‐cycle fatigue criterion applied in biaxial and triaxial out-of-phase stress conditions. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 18(1), pp. 79–91, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.1995.tb00143.x

[43] Susmel, L., Tovo, R. & Lazzarin, P., The mean stress effect on the high-cycle fatigue strength from a multiaxial fatigue point of view. International Journal of Fatigue, 27(8), pp. 928–943, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.11.012

[44] Concli, F., Maccioni, L., Fraccaroli, L. & Bonaiti, L., Early crack propagation in single tooth bending fatigue: Combination of finite element analysis and critical-planes fatigue criteria. Metals, 11(11), p. 1871, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11111871

[45] Karolczuk, A. & Papuga, J., Recent progress in the application of multiaxial fatigue criteria to lifetime calculations. Procedia Structural Integrity, 23, pp. 69–76, 2019. https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Prostr.2020.01.065

[46] Concli, F. & Maccioni, L., Critical planes criteria applied to gear teeth: Which one is the most appropriate to characterize crack propagation. WIT Trans. Eng. Sci, 133, pp. 15–25, 2021. https://doi.org/10.2495/MC210021

[47] Papadopoulos, I.V., Critical plane approaches in high-cycle fatigue: on the definition of the amplitude and mean value of the shear stress acting on the critical plane. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 21(3), pp. 269–285, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-2695.1998.00459.x

[48] Susmel, L., On the overall accuracy of the Modified Wöhler Curve Method in estimating high-cycle multiaxial fatigue strength. Frattura ed Integrita Strutturale, 5(16), pp. 5–17, 2011. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.16.01