François Morency | Stéphane Hallé
OPEN ACCESS
A simplified approach is proposed and used to study the TiO2 nanoparticle transport and diffusion in an exposure chamber. This exposure chamber is used to assess lung toxicity in rats resulting from the inhalation of airborne nanoparticles. The simplified approach uses computational fluid dynamics (CFD) commercial software. The mathematical model for airflow is based on the three-dimensional Reynoldsaveraged Navier–Stokes equations with turbulence modeling. The mathematical model for airborne nanoparticles transport is based on assumptions such that their motions are similar to those of a singlesized diameter distribution of a passive contaminant. This model is valid as long as the nanoparticle concentration is low and the particle diameter is small enough that settling is negligible, which is the case for the exposure chamber studied. With this model, the diffusion coefficient is a property that plays a significant role in the transport of airborne nanoparticles. The particle diffusion coefficient can be expressed in terms of a friction coefficient, and three possible relationships to model particle diffusion are presented. Their influences on the friction and diffusion coefficients are considered for the particular case of TiO2 nanoparticles. Although all the models studied here predict a decrease in the value of the diffusion coefficient with increasing particle diameter, some significant variations can be observed between the models. A specific diffusion model is selected and then used with the simplified approach. The simplified approach is first validated against available correlations for particle deposition on walls. Correlation for deposition loss rate in the case of a room agrees with numerical prediction for particle diameter between 10 and 200 nm. Particle mass concentration distribution inside the exposure chamber is also studied. The computed concentration distribution is quite uniform inside the exposure chamber and corresponds to single point measurements.
CFD, diffusion, exposure chamber, nanoparticles, particle deposition, passive contaminant
[1] Aitken, R.J., Creely, K.S. & Tran, C.L., Nanoparticles: an occupational hygiene review.Health & Safety Executive, p. 113, 2004.
[2] Ostiguy, C., Roberge, B., Menard, L. & Endo, C.-A., Guide de bonnes pratiques favorisantla gestion des risques relies aux nanoparticules de synthese. IRSST, p. 63, 2008.
[3] Hinds, W.C., Aerosol Technology: Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of AirborneParticles. John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1999.
[4] Friedlander, S.K., Smoke, Dust, and Haze - Fundamentals of Aerosol Dynamics. OxfordUniversity Press: New York, 2000.
[5] Rudiak, V.Y., Krasnolutskii, S.L., Nasibulin, A.G. & Kauppinen, E.I., Methods for measuringthe diffusion coeffi cient and sizes of nanoparticles in a rarefi ed gas. DokladyPhysics, 47(10), pp. 758–761, 2002. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/1.1519325
[6] Gussman, R.A., On the aerosol particle slip correction factor. Journal of AppliedMeteorology, 8, pp. 999–1001, 1969. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1969)008<0999:OTAPSC>2.0.CO;2
[7] Morency, F., Halle, S., Dufresne, L. & Emond, C., Evaluation of diffusion models forairborne nanoparticles transport and dispersion. Advances in Fluid Mechanics VII. WITPress: Ashurst, England, 2008.
[8] Maynard, A.D. & Kuempel, E.D., Airborne nanostructured particles and occupationalhealth. Journal of Nanoparticle. Research, 7, pp. 587–614, 2005. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11051-005-6770-9
[9] Lai, A.C.K., Particle deposition indoors: a review. Indoor Air, 12(4), pp. 211–214,2002. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0905-6947.2002.1r159a.x
[10] Corner, J. & Pendlebury, E.D. The coagulation and deposition of a stirred aerosol. Proceedingsof the Physics Society Section B, 64, pp. 645–654, 1951. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0370-1301/64/8/304
[11] Crump, J.G. & Seinfeld, J.H., Turbulent deposition and gravitational sedimentation of anaerosol in a vessel of arbitrary shape. Journal of Aerosol Science, 12, pp. 405–415, 1981.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(81)90036-7
[12] Chen, B.T., Yeh, H.C. & Cheng, Y.S., Evaluation of an environmental reactionchamber. Aerosol Science and Technology, 17(1), pp. 9–24, 1992. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786829208959556
[13] Benes, M. & Holub, R.F., Aerosol wall deposition in enclosures investigated by meansof a stagnant layer. Environment International, 22(Suppl 1), pp. S883–S889, 1996.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-4120(96)00197-3
[14] Lai, A.C.K. & Nazaroff, W.W., Modeling indoor particle deposition from turbulent fl owonto smooth surfaces. Journal of Aerosol Science, 31(4), pp. 463–476, 2000. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(99)00536-4
[15] Menter, F.R., Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications.AIAA Journal, 32(8), pp. 1598–1605, 1994. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/3.12149
[16] Fluent Inc. Fluent 6.3 User's Guide, 2006.
[17] El Gharbi, N., Absi, R., Benzaoui, A. & Bennacer, R., An improved near-wall treatmentfor turbulent channel fl ows. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics,25(1), pp. 41–46, 2011. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10618562.2011.554832
[18] Lechner, M.D. & Machtle, W., Determination of the particle size distribution of 5–100-nmnanoparticles with the analytical ultracentrifuge: consideration and correction of diffusioneffects. Progress in Colloid and Polymer Science, 113, pp. 37–43, 1999. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48703-4_6
[19] Hu, S.C., Chuah, Y.K. & Yen, M.C., Design and evaluation of a mini-environment forsemi-conductor manufacture processes. Building and Environment, 37, pp. 201–208,2002. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(00)00095-0
[20] Zhao, B. & Wu, J. Numerical Investigation of particles diffusion in a clean room.Indoor and Built Environment, 14(6), pp. 459–479, 2005. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1420326X05060190
[21] Zhang, Z., Kleinstreuer, C. & Kim, C.S., Airfl ow and nanoparticle deposition in a16-generation tracheobronchial airway model. Annals of Biomedical Engineering,36(12), pp. 2095–2110, 2008. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-008-9583-z
[22] Kumar, P., Garmory, A., Ketzel, M., Berkowicz, R. & Britter, R., Comparative study ofmeasured and modelled number concentrations of nanoparticules in an urban street canyon.Atmospheric Environment, 43, pp. 949–958, 2009. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.10.025
[23] Lai, A.C.K. & Chen, F.Z., Comparison of a new Eulerian model with a modifi ed Lagrangianapproach for particle distribution and deposition indoors. Atmospheric Environment,41, pp. 5249–5256, 2007. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.05.088
[24] Morency, F. & Halle, S., Modelling nanoparticle transport in an animal exposurechamber: a comparison between numerical and experimental measurements. Advancesin Fluid Mechanics VIII. WIT Press: Algarve, Portugal, 2010.
[25] Dzhaugashtin, K.E., The critical jet fl ow regime. Fluid Dynamics, 25(3), pp. 335–339,1990. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01049812
[26] Crump, J.G., Flagan, R.C. & Seinfeld, J.H., Particle wall loss rates in vessels.Aerosol Science and Technology, 2(3), pp. 303–309, 1983. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786828308958636