Panorama des principales approches relevant du «cadre H∞»
Survey of the main approaches in the "H∞ framework"
OPEN ACCESS
The aim of this paper is to give an insight into the approaches developed for linear systems in the H∞ framework. A particular attention is devoted to robustness aspects, taking advantages of the experience obtained during the works performed by the Service Automatique of Supélec.
Résumé
Cet article a pour but de mettre en perspective les approches utilisant les outils développés dans le cadre linéaire à partir du formalisme Hoe. Les aspects liés à la notion de robustesse y sont plus particulièrement soulignés, à la lumière de l'expérience acquise au cours des travaux effectués dans le Service Automatique de Supélec.
H∞ synthesis, structured singular value, robustness, linear matrix inequalities
Mots clés
Synthèse H∞ , valeur singulière structurée, robustesse, inégalités matricielles linéaires
[1] P. Apkarian, J .M . Biannic, P. Gahinet, «Self-Scheduled Hoo Control of Missile via Linear Matrix Inequalities», J. of Guidance, Control and Dynamics , vol . 18, p . 532–538, 1995 .
[2] P. Apkarian, P. Gahinet. «A Convex Characterization of Gain-Scheduled H∞ Controllers », IEEE Trans. Autom . Control, AC 40, p . 853–864, 1995 .
[3] C . Beck, «Minimality for Uncertain Systems and IQC's», 33rd IEEE Conf on Decision and Control, p . 3068–3073, Lake Buena Vista, 1994 .
[4] C .M . Belcastro, B .C . Chang, «On Parametric Uncertainty Modeling for Real Parameter Variations», 31st IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, p . 674-679 , Tucson, 1992 .
[5] C . Beck, J. Doyle, F. Glover, «Model Reduction of Multi-Dimensional and Uncertain Systems», IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, AC 41, p. 1466-1477 , 1996.
[6] S . Boyd, L . El Ghaoui, E. Féron, V. Balakrishnan, Linear Matrix Inequalities in Systems and Control Theory, SIAM Publications, 1994 .
[7] Yi Cheng, B . De Moor, «A Multidimensional Realization Algorithm for Parametric Uncertainty Modelling and Multiparameter Margin Problems» , Int. J. Control, vol . 60, p . 789-807, 1994 .
[8] J. David, B . De Moor, «Designing Reduced Order Output Feedback Controllers Using a Potential Reduction Method», American Control Conf. , p . 845-849, Baltimore, 1994 .
[9] J .C. Doyle, «Structured Uncertainty in Control Systems Design», 24th IEEE Conf on Decision and Control, p . 260-265, Ft Lauderdale, 1985 .
[10] L. El Ghaoui, F. Oustry, M. AitRami, «A Cone Complementary Linearization Algorithm for Static Output Feedback and Related Problems», IEEE Trans. Autour. Control, AC 42, p. 1171-1175, 1997.
[11] M .K.H. Fan, A . Tits, J.C. Doyle, «Robustness in the Presence of Mixed Parametric Uncertainty and Unmodeled Dynamics», IEEE Trans . Autom. Control, AC 36, p . 25-38, 1991 .
[12] G . Ferreres, J.M . Biannic, «A p-Analysis Technique without Frequency Gridding», American Control Conf., p . 2294-2298, Philadelphie, 1998 .
[13] G . Ferreres, V. Fromion, «Computation of the Robustness Margin with the Skewed p Tool», Systems & Control Letters, vol . 32, p . 193-202, 1997.
[14] J .P. Folcher, Approche Multicritère par Formulation LMI de la Commande des Systèmes, Thèse de Doctorat, Université Paris VI, 1997 .
[15] S . Font, Méthodologie pour Prendre en Compte la Robustesse des Systèmes Asservis : Optimisation H,o et Approche Symbolique de la Forme Standard , Thèse de Doctorat, Supélec et Paris-Sud, 1995 .
[16] J .P. Friang, G. Duc, J .P. Bonnet, «Robust Autopilot for a Flexible Missile : Loop-Shaping H « Design and Real v-Analysis», Int. J. of Robust & Nonlinear Control, vol . 8, p . 129-153, 1998 .
[17] P. Gahinet, P. Apkarian, «A Linear Matrix Inequality Approach to H∞ , Control», Int. J. of Robust & Nonlinear Contr., vol . 4, p . 421-448, 1994 .
[18] P. Gahinet, «Explicit Controller Formulas for LMI-based Synthesis» , American Control Cortf, p. 2396-2400, Baltimore, Maryland, 1994 .
[19] K. Glover, J .C . Doyle, «State-Space Formulae for all Stabilizing Controllers That Satisfy an H «-Nam Bound and Relations to Risk Sensitivity», Systems & Control Letters, vol. 11, p. 167-172, 1988 .
[20] K. Glover, D . McFarlane, «Robust Stabilization of Normalized Coprime Factor Plant Description with H « -Bounded Uncertainty», IEEE Trans . Autom . Control, AC 34, p . 821-830, 1989 .
[21] A. Helmersson, « A Finite Frequency Method for p-Analysis », 3rd European Control Conf., p . 171-176, Rome, 1995 .
[22] A . Hiret, G . Duc, J .P. Friang, «The Application of an LPV/loop-shaping Synthesis for a Missile Autopilot», IFAC World Congress, Beijing, 1999 (à paraître) .
[23] A . Hiret, C . Valentin-Charbonnel, G . Duc, J.P. Bonnet, «Different Multidimensional Reduction Algorithms for the LFT Model of a Missile», 2nd IMACS Intern. Multiconference CESA'98, Nabeul-Hammamet, 1998 .
[24] T. Iwasaki, R .E. Skelton, «All Controllers for the General H~ Control Problem : LMI Existence Conditions and State-Space Formulas», Automatica, vol . 30, p . 1307-1317, 1994.
[25] P. Lambrechts, J . Terlouw, S . Bennani, M. Steinbuch, «Parametric Uncertainty Modeling using LFTs», American Control Conf., p . 267-272, San Francisco, 1993 .
[26] J .F. Magni, C . Döll, p-analysis for Flexible Systems, Rapport technique , ONERA-CERT, soumis pour publication, 1998 .
[27] D . McFarlane, K . Glover, Robust Controller Design Using Normalized Coprime Factor Plant Descriptions, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, Springer Verlag, 1990 .
[28] D. McFarlane, K . Glover, «A Loop Shaping Design Procedure Using H∞ Synthesis», IEEE Trans . Autom. Control, AC 37, p. 759-769, 1992 .
[29] S. Miyamoto, G . Vinnicombe, «Fixed Structure Ho,, Control Design for Multiple Plant . A Coprime Factorisation LMI Based Approach», 4th European Control Conf , Bruxelles, 1997 .
[30] B .G. Morton, «New Applications of p to Real Parameter Variation Problems», 24th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, p. 242—250, Ft Lauderdale , 1985 .
[31] Y. Nesterov, A . Nemirovsky, Interior Point Polynomial Methods in Convex Programming : Theory and Applications, SIAM, 1993 .
[32] A . Packard, «Gain Scheduling via Linear Fractional Transformations» , Systems & Control Letters, vol . 22, p . 79-92, 1994 .
[33] G . Scorletti, L. El Ghaoui, «Improved Linear Matrix Inequality Conditions for Gain Scheduling», 34th IEEE Conf on Decision and Control, p . 3626-3631, New-Orleans, 1995 .
[34] C . Scherer, «Multiobjective H2/H c, Control», IEEE Trans . Autom. Contr. , AC 40, p . 1054-1062, 1995 .
[35] C . Scherer, P. Gahinet, M . Chilali, «Multiobjective Output-Feedback Control via LMI Optimization», IEEE Trans. Autom. Conte, AC 42, p . 896-911, 1997 .
[36] C . Valentin, G. Duc, «Low Order H, Controller Design : A Practical Analysis of the Potential Reduction Method», 4th European Control Conf. , Bruxelles, 1997 .
[37] C . Valentin-Charbonnel, Commande Robuste avec Contrainte d'Ordre, par la Norme H « et le Formalisme LMI Application au Contrôle d'Attitude d'un Satellite d'Observation de la Terre, Thèse de Doctorat, Supélec et Paris-Sud , 1998 .
[38] C . Valentin-Charbonnel, G. Duc, «Optimising p-Analysis without Frequency Gridding . Application to a Satellite Attitude Control Law», 5th European Control Conf , Karlsruhe, 1999 (à paraître) .
[39] C . Valentin-Charbonnel, G . Duc, S . Le Ballois, «Low-Order Robust Attitude Control of an Earth Observation Satellite», Control Engineering Practice , 1999 (à paraître).
[40] P.M . Young, M .P. Newlin, J .C . Doyle, «Computing Bounds for the Mixed p Problem», Int. J. of Robust & Nonlinear Control, vol . 5, p . 573-590, 1995 .
[41] P.M . Young, «Controller Design with Mixed Uncertainties», Int. J. Control , vol . 65, p . 469-509, 1996.
[42] G . Zames, «Feedback and Optimal Sensitivity : Mode] Reference Transformations, Multiplicative Seminorms and Approximate Inverses», IEEE Trans . Autom. Control, AC 11, p. 465-476, 1981 .