Home Journals RCMA Effect of FSW process parameters on strength and peak temperature for joining high-density polyethylene (HDPE) sheets

JOURNAL METRICS

Impact Factor (JCR) 2022: 0.8 ℹImpact Factor (JCR):

The JCR provides quantitative tools for ranking, evaluating, categorizing, and comparing journals. The impact factor is one of these; it is a measure of the frequency with which the “average article” in a journal has been cited in a particular year or period. The annual JCR impact factor is a ratio between citations and recent citable items published. Thus, the impact factor of a journal is calculated by dividing the number of current year citations to the source items published in that journal during the previous two years.

5-Year Impact Factor: 0.5 ℹ5-Year Impact Factor:

A 5-Year Impact Factor shows the long-term citation trend for a journal. This is calculated differently from the Journal Impact Factor, so it is not simply an average of the Impact Factors in the time period. The Impact Factor itself is based only on Web of Science Core Collection citation data from the last three years and thus reflects only recent impact. The Journal Impact Factor is the average number of times articles from the journal published in the past two years have been cited in the Journal Citation Reports year.

CiteScore 2023: 1.9 ℹCiteScore:

CiteScore is the number of citations received by a journal in one year to documents published in the three previous years, divided by the number of documents indexed in Scopus published in those same three years.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2023: 0.245 ℹSCImago Journal Rank (SJR):

The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2023: 0.583 ℹSource Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP):

SNIP measures a source’s contextual citation impact by weighting citations based on the total number of citations in a subject field. It helps you make a direct comparison of sources in different subject fields. SNIP takes into account characteristics of the source's subject field, which is the set of documents citing that source.

qqtu_pian_20240428144739.png

Effect of FSW process parameters on strength and peak temperature for joining high-density polyethylene (HDPE) sheets

Elhadj Raouache^*| Zakaria Boumerzoug | Selvarajan Rajakumar | Fares Khalfallah

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Bordj Bou Arreridj, Algeria

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Biskra, B.P. 145, Biskra, Algeria

Centre for Materials Joining & Research, Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Annamalai University, India

Department of Physics, University of M’sila, Algeria

Corresponding Author Email:

elhadj2m@gmail.com

| | | | Citation

ACCESS

Abstract:

The aim of this experimental work is the joining of similar materials of High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) using the friction stir welding process. A Full-factorial design was used as a statistical approach to analyze the effect of processing parameters on mechanical behavior of welded joint. The welding parameters considered in this study were rotational speed in five levels and traverse speeds in three levels. The strength of welded samples was characterized by tensile test. In addition, temperature measurements were carried out to determine the peak temperature in the joining zone. The results have showed the dependence of tensile strength and peak temperature on rotational speed. A maximum tensile strength was achieved at optimum rotational speed value. Moreover, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicates that rotational speed is the most influenced parameter in strength of joints.

Keywords:

friction stir welding, polyethylene, tensile strength, peak temperature, ANOVA

1. Introduction

2. Experimental details

3. Results and discussion

4. Conclusion

References

Arici A., Sinmaz T. (2005). Effects of double passes of the tool on friction stir welding of polyethylene. J. Mater. Sci, Vol. 40, pp. 3313-3316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-2709-x

Bozkurt Y. (2012). The optimization of friction stir welding process parameters to achieve maximum tensile strength in polyethylene sheets. Mater. Des, Vol. 35, pp. 440-445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.008

Dashatan S. H., Azdast T., Rash Ahmadi S., Bagheri A. (2013). Friction stir spot welding of dissimilar polymethyl methacrylate and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene sheets. Mater. Des, Vol. 45, pp. 135-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.08.071

Hamdi M., Belhorma H. A., Benchatti A., Souici M., Boutassouna B. (2018). The relaxation effect on residual stress value in butt-welded X70 steel. Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 232-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.18280/mmep.050315

Husain I. M., Salim R. K., Azdast T. S., Hasanifard S., Shishavan S. M., Lee R. E. (2015). Mechanical properties of friction-stir-welded polyamide sheets. Int. J. Mech. Mater, pp. 10-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40712-015-0047-6

Kiss Z., Czigany T. (2007). Applicability of friction stir welding in polymeric materials. J. Mech. Eng, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 15-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.3311/pp.me.2007-1.02

Mijajlović M., Milčic D. (2012). Analytical model for estimating the amount of heat generated during friction stir welding: application on plates made of aluminium alloy 2024 T351. Welding Processes, Dr. Radovan Kovacevic (Ed.), InTech. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/53563

Nourani M., Milani A. S., Yannacopoulos S. (2011). Taguchi optimization of process parameters in friction stir welding of 6061 aluminum alloy: A review and case study. Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 144-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/eng.2011.32017

Paoletti A., Lambiase F., Di Ilio A. (2015). Optimization of friction stir welding of thermoplastics. Procedia CIRP, Vol. 33, pp. 562-567. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.06.078

Payganeh G. H., MostafaArab N. B., Dadgar Asl Y., Ghasemi F. A., SaeidiBoroujeni M. (2011). Effect of friction stir welding process parameters on appearance and strength of polypropylene composite welds. Int. J. Phys. Sci, Vol. 6, No. 19, pp. 4595-4601. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/IJPS11.866

Rajakumar S., Muralidharan C., Balasubramanian V. (2011). Statistical analysis to predict grain size and hardness of the weld nugget of friction-stir-welded AA6061-T6 aluminium alloy joints. Int. J. Adv.Manuf. Technol, Vol. 57, pp. 151-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3279-5

Zafar A., Awang M., Khan S. R., Emamian S. (2015). Effect of double shoulder tool rotational speed on thermo-physical characteristics of friction stir welded 16mm thick nylon6. Appl. Mech. Mater, Vol. 799-800, pp. 251-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.799-800.251

IJHT
MMEP
ACSM
EJEE
ISI
I2M
JESA
RCMA
RIA
TS
IJSDP
IJSSE
IJDNE
JNMES
IJES
EESRJ
RCES
AMA_A
AMA_B
AMA_C
AMA_D
MMC_A
MMC_B
MMC_C
MMC_D

Username
Password
Remember me

Search form

Effect of FSW process parameters on strength and peak temperature for joining high-density polyethylene (HDPE) sheets