© 2024 The authors. This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
OPEN ACCESS
This study treats the effect of hydrolytic aging on breakdown voltage of polyesterimide employed in rotating electrical machine windings. The aging was carried out at 93% relative humidity and 40℃ in a climatic chamber. The samples were made as twisted pair copper conductors covered by a thin layer (35 µm) of polyesterimide. The duration of aging is 12000 h (500 days). The values of breakdown voltage were analyzed statistically using Weibull model. The insulation was characterised by FTIR. The study shows modifications of breakdown voltage versus aging time. The decrease is attributed to the increase in free volume leading to the raise in mean free path of charge carriers. While the raise is awarded to the arrangement of the structure. The shape parameter of Weibull plots alters versus aging time. The shortening is attributed to the raise of defect sizes. Whereas the augmentation is allotted to the arrangement of molecular structure. During the tests of dielectric failure, space charge can be formed and affect breakdown voltage. The results of FTIR show the disappearance of several absorbance peaks highlighting the degradation of the material. The degradation is done by the decomposition of imide bond and ester bond at the polyesterimide-copper interface.
polyesterimide, moisture, aging, breakdown voltage, electrical machines, statistics, FTIR, degradation
Farahani et al. [1] reported that the electrical insulation system of high voltage rotating machines is one of the most important parts of them in function of the making cost as well as to the maintenance and the lifetime aspects.
Polyesterimide, polyamide imide, and polyimide are widely utilized in windings of rotating electrical machines. For their selection, it is necessary to considerer various factors: working environment, applied voltage, rotating rate, and operating temperature. Kavanagh et al. [2], and Grubic et al. [3] yielded that the degradation of insulation materials is a major failure mode of electromagnetic coils and electrical machines.
Ksouri et al. [4] considered the water absorption in polyamide 6 (PA6) and polyamide 6 reinforced with 30% of glass fibers (PA6GF30) in distilled water at 90℃ for 80 days. The humidity contents are 8.55 wt% and 5.26 wt% for PA6 and PA6GF30, respectively.
During the operation of electrical machines, the insulation is submitted to the action of moisture. Ji et al. [5] investigated the effect of combined moisture-temperature on partial discharges of copper wires insulated with polyesterimide (class H). The twisted pair specimens were exposed to relative moisture ranging from 30% to 90% at different temperatures: 30℃, 60℃ and 90℃. To evaluate performance of the polymeric material, dielectric loss factor (tgδ), and insulation capacitance (IC) were measured. AC voltage, 50 Hz was applied to the samples with a rate of 700V/s. The authors concluded that tgδ and IC increase with relative humidity. A variation of partial discharge inception voltage versus relative humidity was indicated.
Brandes et al. [6] studied the insulation resistance of polyesterimide mica under hydrolytic aging. Samples were immerged in water. The authors noticed an exceptional resistance to water penetration of the dielectric material after 40 days of aging.
Because of its good properties as dielectric parameters, polyesterimide plays a major role in the field of electrical insulation as mentioned by Arikan et al. [7], and Havran et al. [8]. Despite of its high performance, investigations highlighted degradation of the material under moisture [9, 10]. Lian et al. [9] exhibited samples of polyesterimide to hydrothermal aging. The specimens were aged in oven at 80℃ and 100% relative humidity. The investigation pointed that the glass transition temperature reduces from 333 K to 326 K after 30 days of aging. Niu et al. [10] studied the effect of hydrothermal aging on breakdown strength of polyesterimide. The specimens were exposed in oven regulated at 80℃ and 100% relative humidity during 14 days. The breakdown test was conducted under AC voltage, 50 Hz. The voltage was evenly raised with a speed of 2 kV/s. The investigation indicates a decrease of dielectric strength from 67.27 kV/mm to 32.11 kV/mm after 14 days of aging. The moisture absorptions are 1.50wt% and 1.62wt% after 7 days and 14 days, respectively.
This work reported the investigation of breakdown voltage of polyesterimide under hydrolytic aging. A statistical study of breakdown voltage data was achieved using the Weibull model. The insulation was characterised by Fournier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR).
2.1 Specimens
A bobbin of copper wire enameled with polyesterimide was furnished by TREFICUIVRE, manufacturer in ALGERIA. The insulation, of class H (180℃), has a 35 μm coat. The diameter of the wire is 0.63 mm.
The samples were prepared as twisted pair conductors. Firstly, the insulated wire was cut into lengths of 400 mm. The samples were elaborated using a winding lathe. A weight of 7 N was hooked to the wire, then 12 turns were carried out. At the end, the weight was detached and the buckle located at the top part of the specimen was suppressed. The length of the realized samples is 125 mm. To avert bypasses during the test of dielectric failure, the extremities of the samples were separated. In order to avoid any attendance of defects, the specimens were inspected with a microscope. Figure 1 illustrates a performed sample.
Figure 1. Photograph of an achieved specimen
2.2 Hydrolytic aging
A great number of samples was exhibited to moisture in a climatic chamber regulated at 93% relative humidity and 40℃. The aging was performed up to 12000 h (500 days). To obtain this humidity level, 1.215l of glycerin was mixed with 6.075l of distilled water. The glycerin volume represents 20% of that of distilled water. The enclosure is equipped by temperature regulator and a heating system. After each period of 500 h, 80 specimens were withdrawn from the climatic chamber.
2.3 Dielectric breakdown test
AC voltage, 50 Hz provided by a high voltage transformer, was applied to the extremities of the twists. The voltage was raised with a speed of 0.5 kV/s until a failure occurred. The breakdown voltage was registered. The experiments were executed in air and at ambient temperature. A number of 2000 specimens was tested.
2.4 Fournier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
For the tests of FTIR, a powder of the polymer was mixed with a KBr amount. After blending, the whole was pressed, then the pellets were made. The infrared spectra were measured with JASCO FT/IR in the wavenumber range of 4000 - 500 cm-1. The apparatus is equipped with a computer.
It is well known that failure is a random phenomenon and a statistical study of breakdown voltage or time-to-rupture is useful. Weibull model is widely employed in the investigation in dielectric breakdown of solid dielectrics [10, 11]. A detailed description of this model can be found in a reference book [12]. The two-parameter Weibull distribution is given by Chauvet and Laurent [13]:
$P(V)=1-\exp \left[-\left(\frac{V}{V_o}\right)^\beta\right]$ (1)
where:
P(V): cumulative breakdown probability;
V: breakdown voltage;
V0: scale parameter that is the value of V matching to a cumulative probability of 63.2%;
$\beta$: shape parameter which is the slope of the straight line of Weibull plot.
The precedent relationship can be written as below:
$\log \operatorname{Ln} \frac{1}{1-\mathrm{P}}=\beta \log V-\beta \log V_o$ with P(V) = P.
In the coordinate system $X=\log V$ and $Y=\log \operatorname{Ln} \frac{1}{1-\mathrm{P}}$, the plot must be a straight line. For V = Vo, $\log \operatorname{Ln} \frac{1}{1-\mathrm{P}}=\mathrm{o}$ and $\mathrm{P}=1-\frac{1}{\mathrm{e}}=63.2 \%$.
The statistical study was executed following the steps underneath:
$P=\frac{i}{N+1} 100 \%$ (2)
where:
N: total number of tested specimens; in this work N = 80.
4.1 Statistical analysis
a) Table 1(a) depicts the values of V, P, X and Y before aging. The findings of confidence intervals of breakdown voltage are presented in Table 1(b). For 12000 h of aging, the results of V, P, X and Y, and confidence bounds are exposed in Tables 2(a) and 2(b), respectively.
Table 1(a). Values of V, P, X and Y before aging
No. |
V (kV) |
P |
X |
Y |
1 |
9.2 |
0.1975 |
0.9638 |
- 0.6575 |
2 |
10.6 |
0.4198 |
1.0253 |
- 0.2642 |
3 |
14.1 |
0.9877 |
1.1492 |
0.6429 |
4 |
12.3 |
0.7531 |
1.0899 |
0.1457 |
5 |
10.7 |
0.4444 |
1.0294 |
- 0.2308 |
6 |
10.9 |
0.5062 |
1.0374 |
- 0.1515 |
7 |
12.0 |
0.6914 |
1.0792 |
0.0702 |
8 |
9.8 |
0.3210 |
0.9912 |
- 0.4122 |
9 |
11.5 |
0.6173 |
1.0607 |
- 0.0175 |
10 |
9.5 |
0.2716 |
0.9777 |
- 0.4991 |
11 |
9.4 |
0.2469 |
0.9731 |
- 0.5473 |
12 |
11.1 |
0.5679 |
1.0453 |
- 0.0762 |
13 |
11.1 |
0.5679 |
1.0453 |
- 0.0762 |
14 |
9.8 |
0.3210 |
0.9912 |
- 0.4122 |
15 |
11.6 |
0.6296 |
1.0645 |
- 0.0029 |
16 |
9.4 |
0.2469 |
0.9731 |
- 0.5473 |
17 |
12.9 |
0.8765 |
1.1106 |
0.3205 |
18 |
7.0 |
0.0247 |
0.8451 |
- 1.6020 |
19 |
12.9 |
0.8765 |
1.1106 |
0.3205 |
20 |
11.9 |
0.6543 |
1.0755 |
0.0262 |
21 |
12.5 |
0.7901 |
1.0969 |
0.1935 |
22 |
11.4 |
0.5802 |
1.0569 |
- 0.0614 |
23 |
7.9 |
0.0741 |
0.8976 |
- 1.1137 |
24 |
13.3 |
0.9383 |
1.1239 |
0.4448 |
25 |
9.6 |
0.2840 |
0.9823 |
- 0.4762 |
26 |
12.9 |
0.8765 |
1.1106 |
0.3205 |
27 |
13.0 |
0.9012 |
1.1139 |
0.3646 |
28 |
10.6 |
0.4198 |
1.0253 |
- 0.2642 |
29 |
12.6 |
0.8272 |
1.1004 |
0.2444 |
30 |
9.8 |
0.3210 |
0.9912 |
- 0.4122 |
31 |
13.5 |
0.9506 |
1.1303 |
0.4783 |
32 |
12.3 |
0.7531 |
1.0899 |
0.1457 |
33 |
8.8 |
0.1481 |
0.9445 |
- 0.7950 |
34 |
11.0 |
0.5309 |
1.0414 |
- 0.1210 |
35 |
9.1 |
0.1852 |
0.9590 |
- 0.6887 |
36 |
9.9 |
0.3333 |
0.9956 |
- 0.3920 |
37 |
8.1 |
0.1111 |
0.9085 |
- 0.9289 |
38 |
9.1 |
0.1852 |
0.9590 |
- 0.6887 |
39 |
10.7 |
0.4444 |
1.0294 |
- 0.2308 |
40 |
11.8 |
0.6420 |
1.0719 |
0.0116 |
41 |
12.6 |
0.8272 |
1.1004 |
0.2444 |
42 |
12.5 |
0.7901 |
1.0969 |
0.1935 |
43 |
9.3 |
0.2222 |
0.9685 |
- 0.5998 |
44 |
7.1 |
0.0370 |
0.8513 |
- 1.4232 |
45 |
13.7 |
0.9753 |
1.1367 |
0.5684 |
46 |
8.6 |
0.1358 |
0.9345 |
- 0.8358 |
47 |
12.0 |
0.6914 |
1.0792 |
0.0702 |
48 |
10.5 |
0.3704 |
1.0212 |
- 0.3348 |
49 |
11.1 |
0.5679 |
1.0453 |
- 0.0762 |
50 |
10.0 |
0.3457 |
1.0000 |
- 0.3725 |
51 |
12.8 |
0.8395 |
1.1072 |
0.2623 |
52 |
13.1 |
0.9259 |
1.1173 |
0.4154 |
53 |
12.6 |
0.8272 |
1.1004 |
0.2444 |
54 |
10.9 |
0.5062 |
1.0374 |
- 0.1515 |
55 |
11.0 |
0.5309 |
1.0414 |
- 0.1210 |
56 |
10.8 |
0.4691 |
1.0334 |
- 0.1984 |
57 |
8.1 |
0.1111 |
0.9085 |
- 0.9289 |
58 |
13.7 |
0.9753 |
1.1367 |
0.5684 |
59 |
6.8 |
0.0123 |
0.8325 |
- 1.9058 |
60 |
10.2 |
0.3580 |
1.0086 |
- 0.3534 |
61 |
9.3 |
0.2222 |
0.9685 |
- 0.5998 |
62 |
7.6 |
0.0617 |
0.8808 |
- 1.1958 |
63 |
10.6 |
0.4198 |
1.0253 |
- 0.2642 |
64 |
10.8 |
0.4691 |
1.0334 |
- 0.1984 |
65 |
8.0 |
0.0864 |
0.9031 |
- 1.0439 |
66 |
13.1 |
0.9259 |
1.1173 |
0.4154 |
67 |
12.0 |
0.6914 |
1.0792 |
0.0702 |
68 |
12.2 |
0.7284 |
1.0864 |
0.1151 |
69 |
13.0 |
0.9012 |
1.1139 |
0.3646 |
70 |
12.2 |
0.7284 |
1.0864 |
0.1151 |
71 |
11.5 |
0.6173 |
1.0607 |
- 0.0175 |
72 |
11.5 |
0.6173 |
1.0607 |
- 0.0175 |
73 |
10.9 |
0.5062 |
1.0374 |
- 0.1515 |
74 |
7.3 |
0.0494 |
0.8633 |
- 1.2955 |
75 |
9.5 |
0.2716 |
0.9777 |
- 0.4991 |
76 |
8.9 |
0.1605 |
0.9494 |
- 0.7571 |
77 |
12.5 |
0.7901 |
1.0969 |
0.1935 |
78 |
12.2 |
0.7284 |
1.0864 |
0.1151 |
79 |
10.6 |
0.4198 |
1.0253 |
- 0.2642 |
80 |
8.6 |
0.1358 |
0.9345 |
- 0.8358 |
Table 1(b). Confidence intervals of breakdown voltage before aging
$\log \operatorname{Ln} \frac{1}{1-\mathrm{P}}$ |
Log Vinf |
Log Vsup |
-1.9978 |
0.7254 |
0.8223 |
-1.2899 |
0.8417 |
0.9088 |
-0.9773 |
0.8928 |
0.9475 |
-0.7891 |
0.9239 |
0.9705 |
-0.6514 |
0.9462 |
0.9880 |
-0.5411 |
0.9640 |
1.0019 |
-0.4477 |
0.9790 |
1.0133 |
-0.3657 |
0.9918 |
1.0238 |
-0.2917 |
1.0032 |
1.0337 |
-0.2334 |
1.0145 |
1.0422 |
-0.1592 |
1.0244 |
1.0507 |
-0.0977 |
1.0337 |
1.0591 |
-0.0380 |
1.0428 |
1.0668 |
00.00 |
1.0483 |
1.0721 |
0.0806 |
1.0603 |
1.0833 |
0.1419 |
1.0692 |
1.0920 |
0.2067 |
1.0786 |
1.1018 |
0.2781 |
1.0885 |
1.1121 |
0.3622 |
1.1001 |
1.1251 |
0.4765 |
1.1155 |
1.1423 |
0.6632 |
1.1401 |
1.1716 |
Table 2(a). Values of V, P, X and Y after 12000 h of aging
No. |
V (kV) |
P |
X |
Y |
1 |
8.9 |
0.4691 |
0.9494 |
-0.1984 |
2 |
11.3 |
0.9259 |
1.0531 |
0.4154 |
3 |
6.1 |
0.0741 |
0.7853 |
-1.1137 |
4 |
10.2 |
0.8148 |
1.0086 |
0.2270 |
5 |
9.2 |
05309 |
0.9638 |
-0.1210 |
6 |
10.0 |
0.7654 |
1.0000 |
0.1614 |
7 |
5.3 |
0.0123 |
0.7243 |
-1.9058 |
8 |
10.1 |
0.7901 |
1.0043 |
0.1935 |
9 |
11.3 |
0.9259 |
1.0531 |
0.4154 |
10 |
9.8 |
0.7037 |
0.9912 |
0.0851 |
11 |
11.3 |
0.9259 |
1.0531 |
0.4154 |
12 |
6.8 |
0.1728 |
0.8325 |
-0.7218 |
13 |
10.1 |
0.7901 |
1.0043 |
0.1935 |
14 |
12.5 |
0.9753 |
1.0969 |
0.5684 |
15 |
7.8 |
0.3457 |
0.8921 |
-0.3725 |
16 |
10.9 |
0.8519 |
1.0374 |
0.2809 |
17 |
12.2 |
0.9630 |
1.0864 |
0.5180 |
18 |
10.0 |
0.7654 |
1.0000 |
0.1614 |
19 |
9.8 |
0.7037 |
0.9912 |
0.0851 |
20 |
5.6 |
0.0370 |
0.7482 |
-1.4232 |
21 |
9.1 |
0.4815 |
0.9590 |
-0.1826 |
22 |
9.3 |
0.5679 |
0.9685 |
-0.0762 |
23 |
7.6 |
0.2963 |
0.8808 |
-0.4542 |
24 |
6.9 |
0.1852 |
0.8388 |
-0.6887 |
25 |
7.1 |
0.1975 |
0.8513 |
-0.6575 |
26 |
8.7 |
0.4198 |
0.9395 |
-0.2642 |
27 |
8.4 |
0.3951 |
0.9243 |
-0.2988 |
28 |
8.5 |
0.4074 |
0.9294 |
-0.2813 |
29 |
11.0 |
0.8889 |
1.0414 |
0.3419 |
30 |
7.3 |
0.2346 |
0.8633 |
-0.5730 |
31 |
9.4 |
0.5926 |
0.9731 |
-0.0468 |
32 |
13.4 |
0.9877 |
1.1271 |
0.6429 |
33 |
7.8 |
0.3457 |
0.8921 |
-0.3725 |
34 |
10.7 |
0.8272 |
1.0294 |
0.2444 |
35 |
7.8 |
0.3457 |
0.8921 |
-0.3725 |
36 |
7.5 |
0.2593 |
0.8751 |
-0.5227 |
37 |
8.9 |
0.4691 |
0.9494 |
-0.1984 |
38 |
9.2 |
0.5309 |
0.9638 |
-0.1210 |
39 |
8.2 |
0.3704 |
0.9138 |
-0.3348 |
40 |
6.7 |
0.1481 |
0.8261 |
- 0.7950 |
41 |
11.0 |
0.8889 |
1.0414 |
0.3419 |
42 |
8.8 |
0.4321 |
0.9445 |
-0.2473 |
43 |
7.8 |
0.3457 |
0.8921 |
-0.3725 |
44 |
7.3 |
0.2346 |
0.8633 |
-0.5730 |
45 |
10.2 |
0.8148 |
1.0086 |
0.2270 |
46 |
6.4 |
0.1111 |
0.8062 |
- 0.9289 |
47 |
9.9 |
0.7407 |
0.9956 |
0.1303 |
48 |
9.5 |
0.6420 |
0.9777 |
0.0116 |
49 |
9.3 |
0.5679 |
0.9685 |
-0.0762 |
50 |
7.6 |
0.2963 |
0.8808 |
-0.4542 |
51 |
9.2 |
0.5309 |
0.9638 |
-0.1210 |
52 |
6.1 |
0.0741 |
0.7853 |
-1.1137 |
53 |
6.7 |
0.1481 |
0.8261 |
-0.7950 |
54 |
7.3 |
0.2346 |
0.8633 |
-0.5730 |
55 |
9.5 |
0.6420 |
0.9777 |
0.0116 |
56 |
9.9 |
0.7407 |
0.9956 |
0.1303 |
57 |
8.9 |
0.4691 |
0.9494 |
-0.1984 |
58 |
6.8 |
0.1728 |
0.8325 |
-0.7218 |
59 |
11.0 |
0.8889 |
1.0414 |
0.3419 |
60 |
7.6 |
0.2963 |
0.8808 |
-0.4542 |
61 |
10.9 |
0.8519 |
1.0374 |
0.2809 |
62 |
5.4 |
0.0247 |
0.7324 |
-1.6020 |
63 |
8.4 |
0.3951 |
0.9243 |
-0.2988 |
64 |
8.2 |
0.3704 |
0.9138 |
-0.3348 |
65 |
6.0 |
0.0494 |
0.7782 |
-1.2955 |
66 |
9.4 |
0.5926 |
0.9731 |
-0.0468 |
67 |
9.5 |
0.6420 |
0.9777 |
0.0116 |
68 |
11.6 |
0.9506 |
1.0645 |
0.4783 |
69 |
9.6 |
0.6667 |
0.9823 |
0.0408 |
70 |
9.3 |
0.5679 |
0.9685 |
-0.0762 |
71 |
9.7 |
0.6790 |
0.9868 |
0.0555 |
72 |
6.2 |
0.0864 |
0.7924 |
-1.0439 |
73 |
9.2 |
0.5309 |
0.9638 |
-0.1210 |
74 |
7.4 |
0.2469 |
0.8692 |
-0.5473 |
75 |
6.3 |
0.0988 |
0.7993 |
-0.9830 |
76 |
9.9 |
0.7407 |
0.9956 |
0.1303 |
77 |
9.6 |
0.6667 |
0.9823 |
0.0408 |
78 |
11.4 |
0.9383 |
1.0569 |
0.4448 |
79 |
9.5 |
0.6420 |
0.9777 |
0.0116 |
80 |
6.5 |
0.1235 |
0.8129 |
-0.8802 |
Table 2(b). Confidence intervals of breakdown voltage after 12000 h of aging
$\log \operatorname{Ln} \frac{1}{1-\mathrm{P}}$ |
Log Vinf |
Log Vsup |
-1.9978 |
0.5451 |
0.6710 |
-1.2899 |
0.6962 |
0.7835 |
-0.9773 |
0.7627 |
0.8338 |
-0.7891 |
0.8031 |
0.8637 |
-0.6514 |
0.8321 |
0.8864 |
-0.5411 |
0.8553 |
0.9046 |
-0.4477 |
0.8747 |
0.9193 |
-0.3657 |
0.8914 |
0.9331 |
-0.2917 |
0.9063 |
0.9459 |
-0.2334 |
0.9210 |
0.9570 |
-0.1592 |
0.9338 |
0.9680 |
-0.0977 |
0.9459 |
0.9789 |
-0.0380 |
0.9578 |
0.9890 |
00.00 |
0.9648 |
0.9959 |
0.0806 |
0.9805 |
1.0104 |
0.1419 |
0.9921 |
1.0217 |
0.2067 |
1.0043 |
1.0345 |
0.2781 |
1.0172 |
1.0478 |
0.3622 |
1.0322 |
1.0647 |
0.4765 |
1.0522 |
1.0871 |
0.6632 |
1.0842 |
1.1253 |
b) Figure 2 shows the scatter diagrams of breakdown voltage before aging, and after 4000 h, 8000 h and 12000 h.
c) The values of V0 and $\beta$, and the equations of Weibull plots are given in Tables 3-5. Some examples of Weibull graphs with confidence intervals are presented in Figures 3(a)-3(d). It is about virgin samples, and those aged after 4000 h, 8000 h, and 12000 h. The confidence intervals are marked with dashed lines.
(a) Before aging
(b) After 4000 h of aging
(c) After 8000 h of aging
(d) After 12000 h of aging
Figure 2. Scatter diagram of breakdown voltage
Table 3. Values of V0 and confidence intervals
Aging Time (h) |
Breakdown Voltage (kV) |
0 |
11.176 < V0 = 11.489 < 11.807 |
500 |
10.030 < V0 = 10.418 < 10.817 |
1000 |
10.748 < V0 = 11.146 < 11.554 |
1500 |
9.136 < V0 = 9.554 < 9.986 |
2000 |
9.433 < V0 = 9.736 < 10.045 |
2500 |
9.449 < V0 = 9.838 < 10.239 |
3000 |
10.465 < V0 = 10.745 < 11.029 |
3500 |
9.974 < V0 = 10.385 < 10.808 |
4000 |
9.967 < V0 = 10.255 < 10.548 |
4500 |
10.217 < V0 = 10.502 < 10.792 |
5000 |
9.843 < V0 = 10.161 < 10.485 |
5500 |
9.439 < V0 = 9.732 < 10.031 |
6000 |
9.858 < V0 = 10.170 < 10.488 |
6500 |
10.290 < V0 = 10.670 < 11.060 |
7000 |
9.807 < V0 = 10.153 < 10.507 |
7500 |
9.974 < V0 = 10.341 < 10.717 |
8000 |
10.196 < V0 = 10.520 < 10.851 |
8500 |
10.137< V0 = 10.491<10.854 |
9000 |
10.869 < V0 = 11.187 < 11.510 |
9500 |
10.003 < V0 = 10.313 < 10.609 |
10000 |
8.764 < V0 = 9.099 < 9.443 |
10500 |
9.933 < V0 = 10.178 < 10.426 |
11000 |
9.151 < V0 = 9.444 < 9.743 |
11500 |
8.755 < V0 = 9.163 < 9.607 |
12000 |
9.223 < V0 = 9.561 < 9.907 |
Table 4. Values of $\beta$ with confidence intervals
Aging Time (h) |
Shape Parameter |
0 |
6.054 < β = 7.179 < 8.220 |
500 |
4.404 < β = 5.222 < 5.979 |
1000 |
4.608 < β = 5.464 < 6.256 |
1500 |
3.742 < β = 4.437 < 5.080 |
2000 |
5.302 < β = 6.287 < 7.199 |
2500 |
4.146 < β = 4.917 < 5.630 |
3000 |
6.340 < β = 7.518 < 8.608 |
3500 |
4.146 < β = 4.917 < 5.630 |
4000 |
5.879 < β = 6.971 < 7.982 |
4500 |
6.076 < β = 7.205 < 8.250 |
5000 |
5.265 < β = 6.243 < 7.148 |
5500 |
5.475 < β = 6.492 < 7.433 |
6000 |
5.379 < β = 6.379 < 7.304 |
6500 |
4.613 < β = 5.470 < 6.263 |
7000 |
4.826 < β = 5.723 < 6.553 |
7500 |
4.630 < β = 5.490 < 6.286 |
8000 |
5.343 < β = 6.336 < 7.255 |
8500 |
4.869 < β = 5.774 < 6.611 |
9000 |
5.812 < β = 6.892 < 7.892 |
9500 |
5.659 < β = 6.711 < 7.684 |
10000 |
4.455 < β = 5.283 < 6.049 |
10500 |
6.874 < β = 8.151 < 9.333 |
11000 |
5.316 < β = 6.304 < 7.218 |
11500 |
3.500 < β = 4.151 < 4.753 |
12000 |
4.630 < β = 5.490 < 6.286 |
Table 5. Equations of Weibull graphs
Aging Time (h) |
Equation of Weibull Plot |
0 |
Y = 7.179 X – 7.612 |
500 |
Y = 5.222 X – 5.315 |
1000 |
Y = 5.464 X – 5.721 |
1500 |
Y = 4.437 X – 4.349 |
2000 |
Y = 6.287 X – 6.214 |
2500 |
Y = 4.917 X – 4.882 |
3000 |
Y = 7.518 X – 7.752 |
3500 |
Y = 4.917 X – 4.998 |
4000 |
Y = 6.971 X – 7.048 |
4500 |
Y = 7.205 X – 7.358 |
5000 |
Y = 6.243 X – 6.286 |
5500 |
Y = 6.492 X – 6.421 |
6000 |
Y = 6.379 X – 6.426 |
6500 |
Y = 5.470 X – 5.624 |
7000 |
Y = 5.723 X – 5.761 |
7500 |
Y = 5.490 X – 5.570 |
8000 |
Y = 6.336 X – 6.476 |
8500 |
Y = 5.774 X – 5.894 |
9000 |
Y = 6.892 X – 7.228 |
9500 |
Y = 6.711 X – 6.800 |
10000 |
Y = 5.283 X – 5.066 |
10500 |
Y = 8.151 X – 8.213 |
11000 |
Y = 6.304 X – 6.147 |
11500 |
Y = 4.151 X – 3.994 |
12000 |
Y = 5.521 X – 5.413 |
(a) Before aging: 11.176 < V0 = 11.489 < 11.807; 6.054 < β = 7.179 < 8.220; Y = 7.179 X – 7.612
(b) After 4000 h: 9.967 < V0 = 10.255 < 10.548; 5.879 < β = 6.971 < 7.982; Y = 6.971 X – 7.048
(c) After 8000 h: 10.196 < V0 = 10.520 < 10.851; 5.343 < β = 6.336 < 7.255; Y = 6.336 X – 6.476
(d) After 12000 h: 9.223 < V0 = 9.561 < 9.907; 4.630 < β = 5.490 < 6.286; Y = 5.521 X – 5.413
Figure 3. Weibull plot of breakdown voltage
4.2 Variation of breakdown voltage versus aging time
Figure 4 displays breakdown voltage (V0) against aging time. The curve shows a ragged variation with the attendance of several peaks. The variations can be depicted as follows:
Figure 4. Breakdown voltage versus aging time
4.3 Variation of shape parameter in function of aging time
The variations of shape parameter (β) against aging time are represented in Figure 5 that shows, like Figure 4, an uneven evolution indicating several peaks. The evolutions can be summarized as follows:
Figure 5. Shape parameter as a function of aging time
4.4 Infrared spectra
Table 6 shows the significant infrared absorbance bands of polyesterimide. The IR spectra, in the range 4000 cm-1 - 500 cm-1, are presented in Figures 6-9.
Table 6. Absorbance bands
Absorbance Band Number |
Wavenumber (cm-1) |
1 2 |
3036 1774 |
3 |
1716 |
4 5 6 7 |
1701 1655 1486 1396 |
(a) Wavenumber between 4000 cm-1 to 2000 cm-1
(b) Wavenumber between 2000 cm-1 to 500 cm-1
Figure 6. FTIR spectrum before aging
(a) Wavenumber between 4000 cm-1 to 2000 cm-1
(b) Wavenumber between 2000 cm-1 to 500 cm-1
Figure 7. FTIR spectrum after 4000 h
(a) Wavenumber between 4000 cm-1 to 2000 cm-1
(b) Wavenumber between 2000 cm-1 to 500 cm-1
Figure 8. FTIR spectrum after 8000 h
(a) Wavenumber between 4000 cm-1 to 2000 cm-1
(b) Wavenumber between 2000 cm-1 to 500 cm-1
Figure 9. FTIR spectrum after 12000 h
4.5 Discussion
It arises an absorbance band at 3036 cm-1 allotted to the stretching vibration of hydroxyl groups (OH) [17]. We notice two absorption peaks at 1774 and 1716 cm-1 attributed to the asymmetrical stretching vibration and symmetrical stretching vibration of carbonyl (C=O) on the imide ring, respectively [18]. The absorbance band, detected at 1701 cm-1, matches to the C=O vibration of ester groups [19, 20]. The absorbance band at 1655 cm-1 corresponds to stretching vibration on the C=O ester bond [18]. The absorbance band at 1486 cm-1 is allotted to C-C stretching vibration on benzene ring skeleton [18]. The C-N stretching vibration of aromatic-imide is shown at 1396 cm-1 [18].
The next points can be taken from this investigation:
[1] Farahani, M., Borsi, H., Gockenbach, E. (2006). Dielectric response studies on insulating system of high voltage rotating machines. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, 13(1): 383-393. http://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2006.1624283
[2] Kavanagh, D.F., Gyftakis, K.N., McCulloch, M.D. (2019). Early-onset degradation of thin-film magnet wire insulation for electromechanical energy converters. In the 12th International Symposium on Diagnostics for Electrical Machines, Power Electronics and Drives, Toulouse, France, pp. 37-43. http://doi.org/10.1109/DEMPED.2019.8864916
[3] Grubic, S., Aller, J.M., Lu, B., Habetler, T.G. (2008). A survey on testing and monitoring methods for stator insulation systems of low-voltage induction machines focusing on turn insulation problems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 55(12): 4127-4136. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2008.2004665
[4] Ksouri, I, Almeida, O.D., Haddar, N. (2017). Long term ageing of polyamide 6 and polyamide 6 reinforced with 30% of glass fibers: Physicochemical, mechanical and morphological characterization. Journal of Polymer Research, 24: 133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-017-1292-6
[5] Ji, Y., Giangrande, P., Zhao, W., Madonna, V., Zhang, H., Li, J., Galea, M. (2023). Investigation on combined effect of humidity-temperature on partial discharge through dielectric performance evaluation. IET Science, Measurement & Technology, 17: 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1049/smt2.12128
[6] Brandes, H., Hillmer, T., Frost, N., Mesrobian, A. (2006). Class H insulation system for rotating equipment. In Conference Record of the 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Electrical Insulation, Toronto, ON, Canada, pp. 346-349. https://doi.org/10.1109/ELINSL.2006.1665329
[7] Arikan, O., Uydur, C.H.C., Kumru, C.F. (2022). Prediction of dielectric parameters of an aged MV cable. A comparison of curve fitting, decision tree and artificial neural network methods. Electric Power Systems Research, 208(6): 107892. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2022.107892
[8] Havran, P., Cimbala, R., Kurimsky, J., Dolnik, B., Kolcunova, I., Medved, D., Kiraly, J., Kohan, V., Sarpataky, L. (2022). Dielectric properties of electrical insulating liquids for high voltage electric devices in a time-varying electric field. Energies, 15(1): 391. http://doi.org/10.3390/en15010391
[9] Lian, Z., Niu, H., Li, S. (2019). Detection of ageing effect in polyesterimide by terahertz time-domain spectroscopy. IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology, 9(6): 651-658. https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2019.2941125
[10] Niu, H., Liu, W., Chi, X., et al. (2018). Effects of hygrothermal ageing on breakdown performance of polyesterimide nanocomposites. In 2018 Condition Monitoring and Diagnosis (CMD), Perth, WA, Australia, pp. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/CMD.2018.8535812
[11] Nedjar, M. (2013). Statistical study in short-term dielectric breakdown of polyvinyl chloride. Journal of Vinyl and Additive Technology, 19(3): 177-182. https://doi.org/10.1002/vnl.21312
[12] Lai, C.D. (2014). Generalized Weibull Distributions. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 23-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39106-4
[13] Chauvet, C., Laurent, C. (1993). Weibull statistics in short-term dielectric breakdown of thin polyethylene films. IEEE Transactions on Electrical Insulation, 28(1): 18-29. http://doi.org/10.1109/14.192236
[14] Raju, G., Katebian, A., Jafri, S.Z. (2001). Application of Weibull distribution for high temperature breakdown data. In 2001 Annual Report Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena (Cat. No. 01CH37225), Kitchener, ON, Canada, pp. 173-176. https://doi.org/10.1109/CEIDP.2001.963514
[15] Merdas, I., Thominette, F., Verdu, J. (2000). Humid aging of polyetherimide. II. Consequences of water absorption on thermomechanical properties. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 77(7): 1445-1451. http://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4628(20000815)77:73.3.CO;2-E
[16] Chen, G., Zhou, C., Li, S., Zhong, L. (2016). Space charge and its role in electric breakdown of solid insulation. In the International Power Modulator and High Voltage Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. 120-127. http://doi.org/10.1109/IPMHVC.2016.8012888
[17] Žagar, E., Grdadolnik, J. (2003). An infrared spectroscopic study of H-bond network in hyperbranched polyester polyol. Journal of Molecular Structure, 658(3): 143-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2860(03)00286-2
[18] Qi, C., Yang, W., He, F., Yao, J. (2020). The thermal properties and degradability of chiral polyester-imides based on several L/D-Amino acids. Polymers, 12(9): 2053. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12092053
[19] Fetouhi, L., Martinez-Vega, J., Petitgas, B. (2018). Electric conductivity, aging and chemical degradation of polyesterimide resins used the impregnation of rotating machines, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, 25(1): 294-305. http://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2018.006823
[20] Calabrese, E., Raimondo, M., Catauro, M., et al. (2023). Thermal and electrical characterization of polyester resins suitable for electric motor insulation. Polymers, 15(6): 1374. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15061374
[21] Araki, C., Taguchi, T. (1993). Thermal degradation of polyesterimide magnet wire. In the IEEE Conference of Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena (CEIDP’93), Pocono Manor, PA, USA, pp. 526-531. https://doi.org/10.1109/CEIDP.1993.378919
[22] Lukas Korcak, L., Culliton, D. (2021). Copper oxide formations under polymer coatings during accelerated thermal aging. In 2021 4th International Conference on Electronics and Electrical Engineering Technology, Nanjing, China, pp. 64-68. http://doi.org/10.1145/3508297.3508376
[23] Kerkarine, F., Nedjar, M. (2024). Hydrolytic aging of wire enameled with polyesterimide and polyamide imide used in electrical machines. Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems, 11(4): 1053-1059. https://doi.org/10.18280/mmep.110423