Environmental Assessment Method for a Small-river Restoration Plan

Environmental Assessment Method for a Small-river Restoration Plan

R. Lopa Y. Shimatani

Department of Urban and Environmental Engineering, Kyushu University, Japan

Page: 
523-536
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V8-N4-523-536
Received: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Published: 
31 December 2013
| Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Although more than 23,000 river restoration projects have been conducted during the past 15 years in Japan, reliable environmental assessment methods have not yet been identified. The environment of the Kamisaigo River is assessed before restoration. The river had been canalized with concrete revetments, reducing its biological function. In 2007, the Fukutsu City Government initiated a program to restore the environmental quality of the river. The aim of this paper was to determine the best method of assessing the river environment. The fish and the physical environment to assess the environmental condition of the river are surveyed. A fish index developed by Kyushu University adequately represented characteristics of river health and was used to determine which sites warranted restoration, rehabilitation priorities, and appropriate methods. The authors calculated 14 regionally developed indices using the ecological features of the fish at several river sites. The environmental quality of the river varied substantially across seven sampling sites. Using these assessment results, the authors determined the specific weaknesses that affected the condition of each site. A restoration and improvement program based on these findings accomplished several goals, including restoring the floodplain, incorporating a variety of flow rates, and enhancing vegetation for fish spawning.

Keywords: 

assessment methods, environmental condition, fish index, rehabilitation plan, river restoration

  References

[1] Shimatani, Y., Conservation and Restoration of River Environment: Practice of Nature-abundant River Restoration, Kajima Publishing: Tokyo, 2000.

[2] The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Recommended Determination of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region III Pursuant to Section 404© on the Clean Water Act Concerning the Spruce No.1 Mine Logan County, West Virginia, 2008.

[3] Karr, J.R. & Dudley, D.R., Draft: What is Biological Integrity, 2002.

[4] Shimatani, Y., Ecological Health; Evaluation and Restoration of River Ecosystems, Japan, 2000.

[5] Nakajima, J., Shimatani, Y., Itsukushima, R., & Onikura, N., Assessing riverine environments for biological integrity on the basis of ecological features of fi sh. Advanced in River Engineering, 16, pp. 449–454, 2010.

[6] Karr, J.R., Rivers as sentinels: using the biology of rivers to guide landscape management. In: R.J. Naiman & R.E. Bilby, eds, The Ecology and Management of Stream and Rivers in the Pacifi c Northwest Coastal Ecoregion, Springer-Verlag: New York, 1996.

[7] Itsukushima, R., Shimatani, Y., Nakajima, J., Kawaguchi, Y., Segment-based eco-regions based on fi sh fauna as a biological indicator. Journal of Hydroscience and Hydraulic Engineering, 2010.