How to Foster Fruitful Collaborations – The Impact of Sustainability Science

How to Foster Fruitful Collaborations – The Impact of Sustainability Science

Lara Brungs Katharina Kötter-Lange Jana Kottmeier Rebecca Poersch Petra Schweizer-Ries

Lehr- und Forschungslabor Nachhaltige Entwicklung (LaNE, Teaching and Research Lab for Sustainable Development), University of Applied Sciences Bochum, Germany/Accompanying LaNE-Team Energiewendebauen

| |
| | Citation



One of the most urgent topics of the present, yet only slowly and arduously proceeding, is the energy transition, especially in the heat and building sector. Here, the basic hypothesis is that collaborations between all stakeholders involved are crucial to accelerate the process. The opening of every individual towards the perspective of others and an overarching joint intention is needed. Working from a sustainability science perspective, it is argued that approaching the transition from inside the system will lead to a common ground for collective action. The authors’ role as communication researchers and transformative scientists is embedded in the broader accompanying research for the energy transition in the building sector (‘Energiewendebauen’). With this paper and authors’ work within the broader research network, an attempt is made to open the minds for innovative ways of working and facilitating the shift between science and practice by fostering thriving collaborations applying communication and collaboration knowledge. For this purpose, a multitude of different methods are drawn upon, some of which will be presented in this paper with a special focus on Generative Scribing, which is an artistic approach established in the context of Theory U. Although the method might initially be perceived as being rather unusual by some people and the practicing of this new way of working and communicating might even be rejected by a few, first findings show that when this method is used, people are intuitively attracted and open up in the process.


collaboration, energy transition, generative scribing, interdisciplinarity, sustainability science, Theory U, transdisciplinary, transformation, transformational science, transepistemic


[1] German Energy Agency (dena), Building report – Energy efficiency in the building  stock – statistics and analyses, 2018, available at Dokumente/Pdf/9268_dena_concise_2018_building_report.pdf (accessed 08 August 2021).

[2] Energiewendebauen. Forschung für energieoptimierte Gebäude und Quartiere, avail- able at (accessed 09 August 2021).

[3] United Nations (UN), Transforming our world:  The  2030  Agenda  for  Sustain-  able Development, 2015, available at tions/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf (accessed 05 August 2021).

[4] German Advisory Council on Global Change (WBGU), World in Transition – A Social Contract for Sustainability, 2011, available at tions/publication/world-in-transition-a-social-contract-for-sustainability (accessed 05 August 2021).

[5] United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). The great transformation, Work- ing with radical uncertainty in a planetary crisis, Web Site, available at https://stories. campaign=greattransformation (accessed 10 August 2021).

[6] Korten, D.C., The Great Turning: From Empire to Earth Community, Berrett-Koehler: San Francisco, 2007.

[7] Polanyi, K., The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time, Beacon Press: Boston, MA, 1957.

[8] United Nations (UN), Independent Group of Scientists Appointed by the Secretary-  General, Global Sustainable Development Report 2019: The Future Is Now – Science for Achieving Sustainable Development, 2019, available at (accessed 09 August 2021).

[9] Seager, T., Selinger, E. & Wiek, A., Sustainable engineering science for resolving wicked problems. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 25, pp. 467–484, 2012.

[10] AoH Team Hamburg. The Art of  Hosting  &  Harvesting  conversations  that  mat- ter, Online, 2019, available at uploads/2016/04/Aoh-Hamburg-Handbuch-Final.pdf (accessed 08 August 2021).

[11] Brown, T., Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), pp. 84–92, 2008.

[12] Bird, K., Generative Scribing. A Social Art of the 21st Century. Presencing Institute: Cambridge, 2018.

[13] Scharmer, O.C., Theory U: Leading from the Future as It Emerges – The Social Tech- nology of Presencing. Society for Organizational Learning: Cambridge, MA, 2007.

[14] Göpel, M., The great mindshift, how a new economic paradigm and sustainability trans- formations go hand in hand. The Anthropocene: Politik–Economics–Society–Science, vol. 2, ed. H.G. Brauch, Switzerland: Springer Nature, 2016.

[15] Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N. & Avelino, F., Sustainability transitions research: transforming science and practice for societal change. Annual Review of Environ-  ment and Resources, 42, pp. 599–626, 2017. ron-102014-021340

[16] Grin, J., Rotmans, J. & Schot, J., Transitions to sustainable development: new direc- tions in the study of long-term transformative change. Routledge Studies in Sustain- ability Transitions, Routledge: New York, 2010.

[17] Geels, F.W., The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms. Elsevier Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1, pp. 24–40, 2011.

[18] Meadows, D., Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System. The Sustainability Institute: Hartland, VT, 1999.

[19] Geels, F., McMeekin, A., Mylan, J. & Southerton, D., A critical appraisal of sustainable consumption and production research: the reformist, revolutionary and reconfiguration positions. Global Environmental Change, 34, pp. 1–12, 2015. gloenvcha.2015.04.013

[20] Göpel, M., Hermelingmeier, V., Kehl, K., Then, V., Vallentin, D. & Wehnert, T., System innovation lab: shaping Europe’s energy future, 2016, available at https://epub.wup- (accessed 14 May 2021).

[21] Abercrombie, R., Harris, E. & Wharton, R., New Philanthropy Capital (NPC), Systems Change, A Guide to What It Is and How to Do It. Lankelly Chase: UK, 2015.

[22] Kurt, H., Wachsen! Über das Geistige in der Nachhaltigkeit. Verlag Bild-Kunst: Bonn, 2010.

[23] Harding, S., Animate Earth. Science, Intuition and Gaia. Green Books: Cambridge, 2009.

[24] Merkel, W., Brückner, J., Wagener, H.J. & Teil II, Theoretische Paradigmen, System. Handbuch Transformationsforschung, eds. R. Kollmorgen, W. Merkel & H.J. Wagener, Springer: Wiesbaden, 2015.

[25] Nanz, P., Handbuch Bürgerbeteiligung. Verfahren und Akteure, Chancen und Grenzen. Bundeszentrale für politische, Bildung: Bonn, 2012.

[26] Schweizer-Ries, P. & Perkins, D.D., Sustainability science: transdisciplinarity, tran- sepistemology, and action research. Umweltpsychologie, 16(1), pp. 6–10, 2012.

[27] Iser, O., Schüren, A. & Schweizer-Ries, P., Bewusstseinsbasierte, transformative Nach- haltigkeitswissenschaft. Nachhaltigkeit in den Sozialwissenschaften, Theorie und Praxis der Nachhaltigkeit, ed. W. Leal Filho, Springer Nature, in press.

[28] Schneidewind, U., Singer-Brodowski, M., Augenstein, K. & Stelzer, F., Pledge for a Transformative Science, Wuppertal Paper, no. 191, July 2016.

[29] Schneidewind, U., Transformative Wissenschaft – Motor für gute Wissenschaft und leb- endige Demokratie. GAIA, 24(2), pp. 88–91, 2015.

[30] Scharmer, C.O. & Käufer, K., Awareness-based action research: catching social reality creation in flight. The SAGE Handbook of Action, ed. H. Bradbury. Sage Publications: London, pp. 199–210, 2015.

[31] Wenger, E., Communities of practice: a brief introduction. STEP Leadership Workshop. University of Oregon: Oregon, pp. 1–7, 2011.

[32] Presencing Institute. available at (accessed 09 August 2021).

[33] Wanner, M., Stelzer Dr., F., Reallabore Perspektiven für ein Forschungsformat im Auf- wind. Wuppertaler Impulse zur Nachhaltigkeit. Wuppertal Institut: Wuppertal, 2019.

[34] Defila, R. & Di Giulio, A., eds., Transdisziplinär und transformativ forschen. Eine  Methodensammlung. Springer Nature: Berlin, 2018.

[35] Guided Journaling; Presencing Institute, available at resource/tools/guided-journaling-desc (accessed 09 August 2021).

[36] Protoyping; Presencing Institute, available at tools/prototyping-descavailable (accessed 08. August 2021).

[37] Muff, K., Five Superpowers for Co-Creators. How Change Makers and Business Can Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Routledge: London, 2019.

[38] Fein, E. et al., LiFT Methodology Book. Designing and Hosting Collaboratories, 2018, available at (accessed 10 August 2021).

[39] Evangelical Academy Bad Boll, Art of Hosting: Die Kunst, Räume für gute Gespräche zu schaffen, 2016, available at boll2016.pdf (accessed 08 August 2021).

[40] Watzlawick, P., et al., Menschliche Kommunikation. Hans Huber-Verlag: Bern, 2000.

[41] Schallmo, D.R.A. & Lang, K., Design Thinking erfolgreich anwenden. So entwickeln Sie in 7 Phasen kundenorientierte Produkte und Dienstleistungen. Springer Gabler: Wiesbaden, 2020.

[42] Alexandrakis, J., Cycling towards sustainability: the transformative potential of urban design thinking in a sustainable living lab. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 9, 100269, 2021.


[44] Schneidewind, U., Die Große Transformation. Eine Einführung in die Kunst gesell- schaftlichen Wandels. Fischer: Frankfurt a.M., 2018.

[45] Pardo-del-Val, M. & Martinez-Fuentes, C., Resistance to change: a literature review and empirical study. Management Decision, 41(2), pp. 148–155, 2003. https://doi. org/10.1108/00251740310457597