Review of Empirical Evidence on Households’ Energy Choices, Consumption, Behavioral Tendencies and Patterns Across 32 Countries

Review of Empirical Evidence on Households’ Energy Choices, Consumption, Behavioral Tendencies and Patterns Across 32 Countries

Fulufhelo Licken Mukhadi Machate Machate Khomotso Semenya

University of South Africa, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Science Campus, Florida Park, Republic of South Africa

Page: 
71-93
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/EQ-V6-N1-71-93
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

© 2021 IIETA. This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Many households have restricted access to various energy types and, as a result, are faced with a daily challenge of having to make appropriate energy choices to meet their energy requirements. This paper aimed to review empirical studies on the households’ energy choices and consumption patterns to establish local, regional and global trends. Our findings revealed that fuelwood, electricity, kerosene, liquified petroleum gas (LPG), charcoal, dung cakes and crop residues are the most common fuel type options available to households. Fuelwood was the most common fuel type available to the majority of the households. Our paper indicates that a significant majority of the households tend to practice energy-stacking consumption patterns. Households mostly consume fuelwood, electricity, kerosene, LPG and charcoal for cooking, lighting, water and space heating. The use of fuelwood as a major fuel by the majority of households in relation to intermediate and cleaner fuels is associated with the demo-graphic characteristics of the households, economic status of the household, the biophysical condition of the area where the household is located and the energy supply characteristics. However, the relative importance of these factors in household energy choices varies across the globe, among regions and rural, urban and mixed settings. Our results seem to suggest that the majority of households that rely on fuelwood to meet their energy needs and requirements may relatively earn less income to afford cleaner fuels, are located closer to fuelwood resources, have larger family sizes, low level of education and possibly do not have adequate access to cleaner fuels. Our study indicates that there are weak correlations between the identified 12 factors, except in a few cases where there are moderate positive and negative and mostly significant linear relationships between some factors. The findings of this study have major implications for household energy use policies, plans and strategies.

Keywords: 

determinants, energy sources, factors, fuel, fuel choices, fuel stacking, fuel types, households’ energy choices, household consumption patterns

  References

[1] Ateba, B.B., Prinsloo, J.J. & Fourie, E., The impact of energy fuel choice determinants on sustainable energy consumption of selected South African households. Journal of Energy in Southern Africa, 29(3), pp. 51–65, 2018. https://doi.org/10.17159/2413- 3051/2018/v29i3a4714

[2] Meijaard, E., Abram, N.K., Wells, J.A., Pellier, A.S., Ancrenaz, M., Gaveau, D.L.A., et al., People’s perceptions about the importance of forests on Borneo. PLoS One, 8(9), 2013.

[3] Semenya, K. & Machete, F., Factors that influence firewood use among electrified Bapedi households of Senwabarwana Villages, South Africa. African Journal of Sci- ence, Technology, Innovation and Development, 11(6), pp. 719–729, 2019. https://doi. org/10.1080/20421338.2019.1572336

[4] Makonese, T., Ifegbesan, A.P. & Rampedi, I.T., Household cooking fuel  use  pat- terns and determinants across southern Africa :  Evidence  from  the  demographic  and health survey data. Energy & Environment, 29(1), pp. 29–48, 2018. https://doi. org/10.1177/0958305x17739475

[5] Kowsari, R. & Zerriffi, H., Three dimensional energy profile : A conceptual framework for assessing household energy use. Energy Policy, 39(12), pp. 7505–7517, 2011. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.030

[6] Etim, N.A., Thompson, D. & Etefia, C.E., Influence of socio economic variables     on domestic cooking energy choices of rural poor households. American Journal of Energy Science, 5(1), pp. 1–6, 2018.

[7] Bisu, D.Y., Kuhe, A. & Iortyer, H.A., Urban household cooking energy choice : an example of Bauchi metropolis, Nigeria. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 6, pp. 1–12, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13705-016-0080-1

[8] Malla, S. & Timilsina, G.R., Household Cooking Fuel Choice and Adoption of improved Cookstoves in Developing Countries: A Review. Policy Research Work Papers, World Bank, Washington DC, 2014.

[9] Rahut, D.B., Mottaleb, K.A. & Ali, A., Household energy consumption and its deter- minants in Timor-Leste. Asian Development Review, 34(1), pp. 167–197, 2017. https:// doi.org/10.1162/adev_a_00085

[10] Nyankone, B.O., Factors influencing choice of sources for domestic energy used in households in Thuti Sub-Location, Othaya. Journal of Energy Technologies and Pol- icy, 6(7), pp. 1–9, 2016.

[11] Niyongabo, P. & Makonese, T., Analysis of household energy uses in Mubuga infor- mal settlement, Gitega, Burundi. Journal of Human Ecology, 57, pp. 38–46, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2017.1311653

[12] Jan, G., et al., An ethnobotanical survey on fuel wood and timber plant species of Kaghan Valley, Khyber Pakhtoonkhwa Province, Pakistan. African Journal of Bio- technology, 10(82), paper 19075–83, 2011. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajb10.980

[13] Danlami, A.H., An analysis of the determinants of households’ energy choice: A search for conceptual framework. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 5(1), pp. 197–205, 2015.

[14] Akther, S., Miah, D. & Koike, M., Driving forces for fuelwood choice of households in developing countries: Environmental implications for Bangladesh. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 6(1–2), pp. 35–42, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2010.505011

[15] Ouedraogo, N.S., Energy futures modelling for African countries: LEAP model appli- cation, WIDER Working Paper 2017/56. 2017. https://www.wider.unu.edu/ sites/ default/files/wp2017-56.pdf

[16] Díez, H.E. & Pérez, J.F., Physicochemical characterization of representative firewood species used for cooking in some Colombian regions. International Journal of Chemi- cal Engineering, 2017, pp. 1–13, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4531686

[17] Chen, Q., Yang, H., Liu, T. & Zhang, L., Household biomass energy choice and its policy implications on improving rural livelihoods in Sichuan , China. Energy Policy, 93, pp. 291–302, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.016

[18] Assa, M.M., Maonga, B.B. & Gebremariam, G.G., Non-price determinants of house- hold’s choice of cooking energy in Malawi. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 4(1), pp. 18–28, 2015.

[19] Ekholm, T., Krey, V., Pachauri, S. & Riahi, K., Determinants of household energy consumption in India. Energy Policy, 38(10), pp. 5696–5707, 2010. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.enpol.2010.05.017

[20] Kwakwa, P.A., Wiafe, E.D. & Alhassan, H., Households Energy Choice in Ghana. Journal of Empirical Economics, 1(3), pp. 96–103, 2013.