Beech Leaves Briquettes’ and Standard Briquettes’ Combustion: Comparison of Flue Gas Composition

Beech Leaves Briquettes’ and Standard Briquettes’ Combustion: Comparison of Flue Gas Composition

Jiří Ryšavý Jiří Horák Lenka Kuboňová Miroslav Jaroch František Hopan Kamil Krpec Petr Kubesa

VSB - Technical University of Ostrava, Energy Research Centre, Czech Republic

Page: 
32-44
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/EQ-V6-N1-32-44
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

© 2021 IIETA. This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Biomass stoves are not only popular, widespread and important sources of heat but are also not negligible sources of pollutants. The present study had two objectives in this field of research. The first one was to determine the difference between standard wooden and beech leaves briquettes flue gas composition during similar, standard home combustion conditions. The second objective was to determine the possibility of decreasing the mass concentration of pollutants contained in the flue gas produced by standard and alternative fuel combustion, i.e. wooden briquettes and beech leaves briquettes, by an oxidation catalyst. Significantly higher mass concentration of nitrogen oxides (NOx), almost 2.5 times higher, in the flue gas was observed during the beech leaves combustion. Both fuels reached the edge of actual legislation limit (European Standard Commission regulation [EU] 2015/1185) in case of mass concentration of carbon monoxide (CO). This issue was solved by a palladium-based catalyst with average degree of conversion around 82%. The catalyst also influences flue gas composition from mass concentration of propane point of view with average degree of con- version around 15%. The mass fraction of sulphur, occurring in the beech leaves briquettes, did not cause any issue to the catalyst in terms of its degree of CO conversion. Due to the test results from the beech leaves briquettes, i.e. high mass fraction of ash and high mass concen- tration of NOx in the flue gas, it is appropriate to use this kind of fuel as secondary fuel during the co-combustion process.

Keywords: 

beech leaves, biomass combustion, catalyst, flue gas purification

  References

[1] Bufka, A., Modlík, M. & Veverková, J., Heat Pump Market 1981 to 2019; types, development, sales, outputs, thermal factors; TZB-info. https://vytapeni.tzb-info.cz/ tepelna-cerpadla/19284-tepelna-cerpadla-v-letech-1981-2019-druhy-vyvoj-prodeje- vykony-tepelne-faktory. Accessed on: 21 October 2020.

[2] The European heat pump market has achieved double-digit growth for the fourth year in a row; European heat pump association. https://www.ehpa.org/market-data/. Accessed on: 21 Oct. 2020.

[3] Climate Strategies & Targets, 2030 Climate & Energy Framework; European Commis- sion, Online. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/2030_en. Accessed on: 30 November 2020.

[4] Clean Heat, Residential wood burning, Environmental impact and sustainable solu- tions; Deutsche Umwelthilfe, Online. https://www.clean-heat.eu/en/actions/info-mate- rial/download/background-paper-residential-wood-burning-3.html. Accessed on: 30 November 2020.

[5] Czech Hydrometeorological Institute, Czech Republic Emission Balance. http://por- tal.chmi.cz/files/portal/docs/uoco/oez/embil/dokumentySpolecne.html. Accessed on: 4 January 2020.

[6] Bioenergy Europe, European Wood Pellet Consumption; European Pellet Council, Online. https://epc.bioenergyeurope.org/about-pellets/pellets-statistics/european-con- sumption/. Accessed on: 30 November 2020.

[7] Büfka, A., Veverková, J. & Andronic, D., Renewable sources of energy in year 2017. Ministry of industry and trade. https://www.mpo.cz/assets/cz/energetika/statistika/ obnovitelne-zdroje-energie/2018/12/Obnovitelne-zdroje-energie-v-roce-2017-new.pdf. Accessed on: 21 October 2020.

[8] Czech pellet: healthy, comfort fuel; Česká peleta, z.s.p.o., https://www.ceska-peleta.cz/. Accessed on: 4 January 2020.

[9] Deepak, K.B., Manujesh, B.J., Vivek, A. & Yashas, B.K., Development and study of fuel briquettes from areca leaves: A potential renewable energy source. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2080, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5092907

[10] Khorasgani, N.B., Sengul, A.B. & Asmatulu, E., Briquetting grass and tree leaf bio- mass for sustainable production of future fuels: A potential renewable energy source. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 10, pp. 915–924, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s13399-019-00465-7

[11] Anggono, W., Suprianto, F.D., Gotama, G.J., Sutrisno, A. & Evander, J., Combustion characteristics behavior of Pterocarpus indicus leaves waste briquette at various particle size and pressure. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 417, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/417/1/012007

[12] Biswas, D.P., Physicochemical property and heating value analyses of charcoal briquettes from agricultural wastes: an alternative renewable energy source. International Confer- ence on Computer, Communication, Chemical, Material and Electronic Engineering (IC4ME2). IEEE, pp. 1–5, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC4ME2.2018.8465639

[13] Hardianto, T., Pambudi, F.F. & Irhamna, A.R., A study on lignin characteristic as inter- nal binder in hot briquetting process of organic municipal solid waste. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1984, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5046634

[14] Shiferaw, Y., et al., Conversion of coffee residue waste and Eucalyptus globulus leaf extract into an alternative solid fuel. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 40, pp. 780–786, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2018. 1463309

[15] Ushakov, D.E., Karelin, D.V., Bychkov, A.L., Korobeinichev, O.P. & Shmakov, A.G., Preparation of fuel briquettes from plant biomass. Solid Fuel Chemistry, 51, pp. 238– 242, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0361521917040103

[16] Shuma, M.R., Madyira, D.M. & Oosthuizen, G.A., Combustion behavior of loose bio- mass briquettes resulting from agricultural and forestry residues. International Confer- ence on the Domestic Use of Energy (DUE). IEEE, 2017, pp. 38–44, 2017. https://doi. org/10.23919/DUE.2017.7931822

[17] Malak, K., et al., Green coal: A new energy source from leaves. Energy Procedia, 100, pp. 484–491, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.207

[18] Jittabut, P., Physical and thermal properties of briquette fuels from rice straw and sug- arcane leaves by mixing molasses. Energy Procedia, 79, pp. 2–9, 2015. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.452

[19] Yunfei, Y., et al., Experimental investigation on mixed combustion characteristics of coal, tobacco straw, and cinder in an energy-saving bake process. Journal of Energy Resources and Technology, 143(2), pp. 1–6, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047763

[20] Hatmojo, R.B.D., et al., Experimental study on leaf litter briquettes combustion as alter- native energy source for cooking. AIP Conf. Proc., 2255, pp. 1–6, 2020. https://doi.org/ 10.1063/5.0013690

[21] Ryšavý, J., et al., Beech leaves briquettes as fuel for a home combustion unit. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 246, WIT Press, 2020, ISSN 174- 3541. https://doi.org/10.2495/EPM200081

[22] COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2015/1185: of 24 April 2015 implementing Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ecodesign requirements for solid fuel local space heaters.

[23] Cotana, F., et al., Pollutant emissions of a biomass gasifier inside a multifuel energy plant. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 10(6), pp. 2000–2009, 2019. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.apr.2019.09.007

[24] Čespiva, J., et al., Characterization of tars from a novel, pilot scale, biomass gasifier working under low equivalence ratio regime. Renewable Energy, 159, pp. 775–785, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.06.042

[25] Atmos, Wood gasification boilers – DOKOGEN; Jaroslav Cankař a syn ATMOS, Online. https://www.atmos.eu/en/wood-gasification-boilers-dokogen/. Accessed on: 30 November 2020.

[26] Ryšavý, J., Horák, J., Hopan, F., Kuboňová, L., Krpec, K., & Kubesa, P., Comparison of catalysts in the point of view of pellet stove flue gas purification. International Journal of Energy Production and Management, 4, pp. 124–133, 2019. https://doi.org/10.2495/ EQ-V4-N2-124-133

[27] Ryšavý, J., Horák, J., Hopan, F., Kuboňová, L., Krpec, K. & Kubesa, P., Possibilities of reducing pollutant concetrations from biomass combustion for household heating using catalyst. Journal of Heating, Ventilation, Sanitation, 28, pp. 140–147, 2019.

[28] Reichert, G., Schmidl, C., Haslinger, W., Stressler, H., Sturmlechner, R., Schwabl, M., Wöhler,  M. & Hochenauer, C., Impact of oxidizing honeycomb catalysts integrated  in firewood stoves on emissions under real-life operating conditions. Fuel Processing Technology, 177, pp. 109–118, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.10.065

[29] Ryšavý, J., et al., Condensation of water vapour in the flue gas path. Journal of Heating, Ventilation, Sanitation, 29, pp. 193–199, 2020.

[30] EN 13240 Room heaters fired by solid fuel - Requirements and test methods. Prague: Czech office for standards metrology and testing, 2002.