© 2020 IIETA. This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
OPEN ACCESS
The volatile nature of the renewable energy sources requires energy storage to compensate for the imbalances and to provide reliable base load. Power-to-Methane technology facilitates long-term high capacity renewable energy storage in the form of Synthetic Natural Gas (SNG) in the gas network. Unlike hydrogen, SNG usage in the network has no restrictions and natural gas appliances can operate on SNG. The two inputs required to produce SNG in the methanator are hydrogen and CO2 and they can be obtained from several sources. This leads to multiple possible process flow configurations in SNG production, each of them with varying performance. An optimization model has been developed in GAMS to analyse the performance of these various configurations. The objective of this research is to determine the optimal configuration, key cost factors and their effects on the production cost to identify the areas that require further development for cost reduction. This work also aims to determine the production cost per unit of SNG and the factors with most significant influence on the production cost by implementing a factorial design and a multivariate analysis (analysis of variance) approach. Methanator, electrolyser, biogas upgrader and hydrogen storage are considered as the fundamental process units in this work. The lowest production cost identified in the first year of production is 0.432 €/kWhSNG. The discounted production cost obtained shows that the lowest cost in 20 years from now is 0.143 €/kWhSNG. The variable with the most influence on the production cost is the capex of the methanator followed by the capacity of the methanator.
Power-to-Methane, SNG production cost, Synthetic Natural Gas (SNG)
[1] EU position for the UN climate change conference in Paris: Council conclusions, Con- ference of the Parties (COP 21), 2015.
[2] Gotz, M., Lefebvre, J., Mors, F., Koch, A.M., Graf, F., Bajohr, S., Reimert, R. & Kolb, T., Renewable power-to-gas: A technological and economic review. Renewable Energy, 85, pp. 1371–1390, 2016.
[3] Guilera, J., Morante, J.R. & Andreu, T., Economic viability of SNG production from power and CO2. Energy Conversion and Management, 162, pp. 218–224, 2018.
[4] Gahleitner, G., Hydrogen from renewable electricity: An international review of power-to-gas pilot plants for stationary application. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38(5), pp. 2039 – 2061, 2013.
[5] Antenucci, A. & Sansavini, G., Extensive CO2 recycling in power systems via power-to- gas and network storage. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 100, pp. 33–43, 2019.
[6] Fevre, C.N.L., The future of gas networks: Key issues for debate, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 2019.
[7] Pellegrino, S., Lanzini, A. & Leone, P., Greening the gas network – the need for model- ling the distributed injection of alternative fuels. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, pp. 266–286, 2017.
[8] Curto, D. & Martin, M., Renewable based biogas upgrading. Journal of Cleaner Pro- duction, 224, pp. 50–59, 2019.
[9] Blanco, H., Nijs, W., Ruf, J. & Faaij, A., Potential of power-to-methane in the EU energy transition to a low carbon system using cost optimization. Applied Energy, 232, pp. 323–340, 2018.
[10] Sibai, A.E., Rihko-Struckmann, L. & Sundmacher, K., Synthetic methane from CO2: Dynamic optimization of the Sabatier process for power-to-gas applications. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, 37, pp. 1157–1162, 2015.
[11] Gorre, J., Ortloff, F. & van Leeuwen, C., Production costs for synthetic methane in 2030 and 2050 of an optimized power-to-gas plant with intermediate hydrogen storage. Applied Energy, 253, paper 113594, 2019.
[12] Jeanmonod, G., Wang, L., Diethelm, S., Marechal, F. & van Herle, J., Trade-off designs of power-to-methane systems via solid-oxide electrolyser and the application to biogas upgrading. Applied Energy, 247, pp. 572–581, 2019.
[13] Guilera, J., Andreu, T., Basset, N., Boeltken, T., Timm, F., Mallol, I. & Morante, J.R., Synthetic natural gas production from biogas in a waste water treatment plant. Renew- able Energy, 146, pp. 1301–1308, 2020.
[14] Collet, P., Flottes, E., Favre, A., Raynal, L., Pierre, H., Capela, S. & Peregrina, C., Techno-economic and life cycle assessment of methane production via biogas upgrad- ing and power-to-gas technology. Applied Energy, 192, pp. 282–295, 2017.
[15] Bailera, M., Lisbona, P., Romeo, L.M. & Espatolero, S., Power-to-gas projects review: Lab, pilot, and demo plants for storing renewable energy and CO2. Renewable and Sus-tainable Energy Reviews, 69, pp. 292–312, 2017.
[16] Saba, S.M., Muller, M., Robinius, M. & Stolten, D., The investment costs of electroly- sis – A comparison of cost studies from the past 30 years. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43(3), pp. 1209–1223, 2018.
[17] Miltner, M., Makaruk, A. & Harasek, M., Review on available biogas upgrading tech- nologies and innovations towards advanced solutions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 161, pp. 1329–1337, 2013.
[18] Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland (SEAI), Domestic fuels – Comparison of Energy Costs, 2019.
[19] U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Hydrogen Production Tech Team Roadmap, USDRIVE, 2017.
[20] Saxe, M. & Alvfors, P., Advantages of integration with industry for electrolytic hydro- gen production. Energy, 32(1), pp. 42–50, 2007.
[21] Kato, T., Kubota, M., Kobayashi, N. & Suzuok, Y., Effective utilization of by-product oxygen from electrolysis hydrogen production. Energy, 30(14), pp. 2580–2595, 2005.
[22] Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland (SEAI), Energy in Ireland - 2018 Report, 2018. [23] World Bank Group: Natural Gas Prices Forecast: Long Term 2018 to 2030. URL http:// comstat.comesa.int/ncszerf/natural-gas-prices-forecast-long-term-2018-to-2030-data-and-charts–Überprüfungsdatum2019-02-20