OPEN ACCESS
The world’s energy consumption is increasing, and research regarding utilization of renewable energy sources is crucial. Biomass for direct heating has been used for thousands of years, while in the last decades alternative ways to exploit biomass have emerged. In order to increase the efficiency and to produce more applicable products, gasification of biomass is becoming a more and more promising technology. For the gasification technology to be competitive, the understanding of the various aspects regarding the gasifier operation, which in turn influences the quality of the product gas, is of utmost importance. The main objective of this work is to investigate the effect of the air to biomass ratio on the produced gas composition in terms of the high-energy components H2, CH4 and CO. Experiments were performed with wood chips in a pilot scale gasification reactor. The results show that an air-to-biomass ratio less than one gives the most applicable gas composition. Biomass, like wood chips, has a peculiar shape, has a large particle size, is cohesive, and is therefore difficult to fluidize. In a fluidized bed gasifier, a bed material is used to improve the fluidization quality. Experiments were carried out in a cold bed model to study the fluidization properties of the bed material. Minimum fluidization velocities were predicted based on pressure drop in the bed.
Baracuda, biomass, bubbling fluidized bed, CPFD, gasification, multiphase flow
[1] Zou, Z., Zhao, Y.L., Zhao, H., Zhang, L.B., Xie, Z.H., Li, H.Z. & Zhu, Q.S., Hydrodynamic and solids residence time distribution in a binary bubbling fluidized bed: 3D computational study coupled with the structure-based drag model. Chemical Engineering Journal, 321, pp. 184–194, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.03.110
[2] Ghaly, A.E. & MacDonald, K.N., Mixing patterns and residence time determination in a bubbling fluidized bed system. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 5(2), pp. 170–183. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2012.170.183
[3] Timmer, K.J., Carbon Conversion During Bubbling Fluidized Bed Gasification of Biomass, Retrospective Thesis and Dissertations; Iowa State University: Iowa, 2008.
[4] Molino, A., Chianese, S. & Musmarra, D., Biomass gasification technology: The state of the art overview. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 25(1), pp. 10–25, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2015.11.005
[5] Jaiswal, R., Computational Modelling and Experimental Studies on Fluidized Bed Regimes, Master Thesis, University of South-Eastern Norway, 2018.
[6] Agu, C.E., Pfeifer, C., Eikeland, M., Tokheim, L.A. & Moldestad, B.M.E., Measurement and Characterization of Biomass Mean Residence Time in an Air-Blown Bubbling Fluidized Bed Gasification Reactor, Revised and resubmitted to Fuel, 2019.
[7] Thapa, R.K. & Halvorsen, B.M., Stepwise analysis of reactions and reacting flow in a dual fluidized bed gasification reactor. WIT Transactions on Engineering Sciences, 82, pp. 37–48, 2014. https://doi.org/10.2495/afm140041
[8] Wen, C. & Yu, Y., Mechanics of fluidization. Chemical Engineering Progress Symposium Series, 62, pp. 100–111, 1966.
[9] Thapa, R.K., Frohner, A., Tondl, G., Pfeifer, C. & Halvorsen, B.M., Circulating fluidized bed combustion reactor: Computational particle fluid dynamic model validation and gas feed position optimization. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 92, pp. 180–188, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.05.008
[10] Chladek, J., Jayarathna, C.K., Moldestad, B.M.E. & Tokheim, L.A., Fluidized bed classification of particles of different size and density. Chemical Engineering Science, 177, pp. 155–162, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2017.11.042
[11] Jayarathna, C.K., Moldestad, B.E. & Tokheim, L.A., Validation of results from Barracuda® CFD modelling to predict minimum fluidization velocity and pressure drop of Geldart A particles. Proceedings of the 58th SIMS conference, 2017.