Environmental and Managerial Advantages of Treatment Plants Exploiting Biogas From Food Waste

Environmental and Managerial Advantages of Treatment Plants Exploiting Biogas From Food Waste

Marco Schiavon Elena Cristina Rada Lucian-Ionel Cioca Vincenzo Torretta Marco Ragazzi

Department of Civil Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, University of Trento, Italy

Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy

Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Lucian Blaga, University of Sibiu, Romania

Page: 
292-306
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/EQ-V3-N4-292-306
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

The sector of biomethane production is receiving growing consideration in Europe, as an evolution of the conventional exploitation of biogas in combined heat and power (CHP) generators. From the technical point of view, a common need is to have available tools and calculations suitable for analysing the environmental advantages of this approach. The present paper compares the emissions of air pollutants related to three options for biogas valorisation from waste anaerobic digestion (AD) plants equipped with a post-composting stage: (1) CHP generation and electric energy supply to an electricity distribution network, and biomethane production through (2) pressurised water scrubbing and (3) chemical absorption. In the last two cases, biomethane is considered useful for natural-gas buses for the public. The results demonstrate that option (1) produces a lower amount of global pollutants but a higher amount of local contaminants compared to options (2) and (3). Therefore, decision makers should consider what impacts are more important for the specific context in which an AD and post-composting plant will be located. In addition, this paper estimates the benefits in terms of energy balance and surface occupancy when a conventional composting plant is converted into an AD and post-composting process. 

Keywords: 

anaerobic digestion, biogas, biomethane, composting, emissions

  References

[1] Malinauskaite, J., Jouhara, H., Czajczy ska, D., Stanchev, P., Katsou, E., Rostkowski, P., Thorne, R.J., Colón, J., Ponsá, S., Al-Mansour, F., Anguilano, L., Krzy y ska, R., López, L.C., Vlasopoulos, A. & Spencer, N., Municipal solid waste management and waste-to-energy in the context of a circular economy and energy recycling in Europe. Energy, 141, pp. 2013–2044, 2017.

[2] European Union, Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste. Official Journal of the European Union L, 182, pp. 1–19, 1999.

[3] Wang, X., Jia, M., Lin, X., Xu, Y., Ye, X., Kao, C.M. & Chen, S., A comparison of CH4, N2O and CO2 emissions from three different cover types in a municipal solid waste landfill. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 67(4), pp. 507–515, 2017.

[4] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Understanding Global Warming Potentials. Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Available at www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/understanding- global-warming-potentials (accessed 22 August 2017).

[5] European Union, Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives. Official Journal of the European Union L, 312(3), pp. 3–30, 2008.

[6] Ragazzi, M., Tosi, P., Rada, E.C., Torretta, V. & Schiavon, M., Effluents from MBT plants: Plasma techniques for the treatment of VOCs. Waste  Management, 34(11),  pp. 2400–2406, 2014.

[7] Rada, E.C., Bresciani, C., Girelli, E., Ragazzi, M., Schiavon, M. & Torretta, V., Anal- ysis and Measures to Improve Waste  Management in Schools. Sustainability, 8(9),    p. 840, 2016.

[8] Shao, L.M., Zhang, C.Y., Wu, D., Lü, F., Li, T.S. & He, P.J., Effects of bulking agent addition on odorous compounds emissions during composting of OFMSW. Waste Management, 34(8), pp. 1381–1390, 2014.

[9] Schiavon, M., Martini, L.M., Corrà, C., Scapinello, M., Coller, G., Tosi, P. & Ragazzi, M., Characterisation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) released by the composting of different waste matrices. Environmental Pollution, 231, pp. 845–853, 2017.

[10] Smet, E., Van Langenhove, H. & De Bo, I., The emission of volatile compounds during the aerobic and the combined anaerobic/aerobic composting of biowaste. Atmospheric Environment, 33(8), pp. 1295–1303, 1999.

[11] United Nations, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. Available at www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E (accessed 28 August 2017).

[12] Ciuta, S., Antognoni, S., Rada, E., Ragazzi, M., Badea, A. & Cioca, L.I., Respirometric Index and Biogas Potential of Different Foods and Agricultural Discarded Biomass. Sustainability, 8(12), p. 1311, 2016.

[13] Italian Composting Consortium, L’integrazione tra la digestione anaerobica e il com- postaggio [The integration between anaerobic digestion and composting]. Technical report (in Italian), 2006.

[14] Haug, R.T., Substrate Biodegradability, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, p. 752, 1993.

[15] Spuhler, Anaerobic Digestion (Organic Waste). Sustainable Sanitation and Water Management. Available at http://sswm.info/content/anaerobic-digestion-organic- waste 2017.

[16] EPA Victoria, Waste Materials—Density Data.  Environmental  Protection Authority of the State Government of Victoria. Available at www.epa.vic.gov.au/business-and- industry/lower-your-impact/~/media/Files/bus/EREP/docs/wastematerials-densities- data.pdf (accessed 21 August 2017).

[17] Zhang, R., El-Mashad, H.M., Hartman, K., Wang, F., Liu, G., Choate, C. & Gamble, P., Characterization of food waste as feedstock for anaerobic digestion. Bioresource Technology, 98(4), pp. 929–935, 2007.

[18] Waste and Resources Action Programme, Digestates: Realising the fertilizer benefits for crops and grassland. Technical report No. OAV036-210, 2011.

[19] Ryckebosch, E., Drouillon, M. & Vervaeren, H., Techniques for transformation of biogas to biomethane. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35(5), pp. 1633–1645, 2011.

[20] Abdeen, F.R.H., Mel, M., Jami, M.S., Ihsan, S.I. & Ismail, A.F., A review of chemical absorption of carbon dioxide for biogas upgrading. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 24(6), pp. 693–702, 2016.

[21] Budzianowski, W.M., Wylock, C.E. & Marciniak, P.A., Power requirements of biogas upgrading by water scrubbing and biomethane compression: Comparative analysis of various plant configurations. Energy Conversion and Management, 141, pp. 2–19, 2017.

[22] Leonzio, G., Upgrading of biogas to bio-methane with chemical absorption process: simu- lation and environmental impact. Journal of Cleaner Production, 131, pp. 364–375, 2016.

[23] Rotunno,P., Lanzini, A. & Leone, P., Energy and economic analysis of a water scrub- bing based biogas upgrading process for biomethane injection into the gas grid or use as transportation fuel. Renewable Energy, 102B, pp. 417–432, 2017.

[24] de Leeuw, F.A., A set of emission indicators for long-range transboundary air pollution. Environmental Science & Policy, 5(2), pp. 135–145, 2002.

[25] European Environment Agency, EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guide- book, 2013.

[26] European Union Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control). Official Journal of the European Union L, 334(17), 2010.

[27] Nielsen, M., Nielsen, O.K. & Plejdrup, M., Danish Emission Inventories for Stationary Combustion Plants. Scientific report No. 102/2014. Danish Centre for Environment and Energy, 2014.

[28] ISPRA, Italian Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1990–2014. Technical report No. 239/2016. Institute for Environmental Protection and Research, 2016.

[29] ISPRA, Italian Emission Inventory 1990–2013. Technical report No. 223/2015. Insti- tute for Environmental Protection and Research, 2015.