OPEN ACCESS
The requirement of energy in different human activities is continuously increasing; from the energetic production, chiefly by thermal systems, important and worrying environmental problems are generated: there are concerns about climate change, local air quality worsening, exhaustion of resources and land use change. To limit these negative aspects, policies of reduction in energy use must be first proposed; besides different technological, economic and planning solutions can be considered; their effect must be carefully assessed, as concerns effectiveness and practical implementation. The final political decision must consider the different tools that are at disposal, in order to define the best approach for the satisfaction of necessities with the minimum consequent impact.
climate change, energy production, environmental compatibility
[1] IEA Technology Roadmap, 2012, Bioenergy for heat and power, available at http:// www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/bioenergy.pdf, 2012 (accessed 9 January 2014).
[2] Aebiom European Biomass Association, 2013, European Bioenergy Outlook 2013 IEA World Energy Outlook;
[3] EU Energy Transport and GHG Emissions – Trends to 2050 – Reference Scenario, 2013, available <http://ec.europa.eu/energy/observatory/trends_2030/doc/trends_to_2050_ update_2013.pdf>, (accessed 9 January 2014).
[4] Climate Policy Initiative, 2011, Information tools for energy demand reduction in ex- isting residential buildings, CPI Report, available <http://climatepolicyinitiative.org/ wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Information-Tools-for-Energy-Demand-Reduction.pdf>, accessed 01/09/2014;
[5] Park, C.W., Kwon K. S., Kim W. B., Min B. K., Park S. J., Sung I. H., Yoon Y. S., Lee K. S., Lee J. H., Seok J.2010, Energy consumption reduction technology in manu- facturing – A selective review of policies, standards and research. International Jour- nal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 10, pp. 151–173. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12541-009-0107-z
[6] IEA. Technologies and Approaches to Reduce the Fuel Consumption of Medium and Heavy-Duty Vehicles, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2010.
[7] Havelsky, V., Energetic efficiency of cogeneration systems for combined heat, cold and power production. International Journal of Refrigeration, 22, pp. 479–485, 1999. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-7007(99)00010-9
[8] Torchio, M., et al., Merging of energy and environmental analyses for district heat- ing systems. Energy, 34, pp. 220–227, 2009. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ener- gy.2008.01.012
[9] SUNCOR, Report on Sustainability 2013, Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The Path For- ward, SUNCOR Energy, Inc., available at http://sustainability.suncor.com/2013/en/en- vironment/ghg-emissions-path-forward.aspx, 2013 (accessed 9 January 2014).
[10] IPCC, Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Energy; 2, available at http:// www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/vol2.html, 2006 (accessed 9 January 2014).
[11] IEA Bioenergy, Using a life cycle assessment approach to estimate the net greenhouse gas emissions of bioenergy, available at http://www.ieabioenergy.com/wp-content/up- loads/2013/10/Using-a-LCA-approach-to-estimate-the-net-GHG-emissions-of-bioen- ergy.pdf, 2011 (accessed 9 January 2014).
[12] IPCC, Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage,Cambridge University Press, available at http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/special-reports/srccs/srccs_wholereport.pdf, 2005 (accessed 9 January 2014).
[13] Riekert, J.W. & Koch, S.F., Projecting the external health costs of a coal-fired power plant. The case of Kusile. Journal of Energy in Southern Africa, 23, pp. 52–66, 2012.
[14] United Nations, A framework for decision makers. UN Energy, 2007.
[15] European Commission, Reference Document on BAT for large Combustion plants, 2006.
[16] Canova, A., et al., Emission characterization and evaluation of natural gas-fueled cogeneration microturbines and internal combustion engines. Energy Conversion and Management, 49, pp. 2900–2909, 2008. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.encon- man.2008.03.005
[17] European Commission JRG, Indirect land use change from increased biofuels demand by Edwards, Mulligan, Marelli, 2010.
[18] Genon, G., et al., Energy and environmental assessment of small district heating sys- tems: global and local effects in two case-studies. Energy Conversion and Management, 50, pp. 522–529, 2009. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2008.11.010
[19] Pohekar, S.D. & Ramachandran, M., Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning – a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 8, pp. 365–381, 2004. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007
[20] Stavins, R.N., Experience with market-based environmental policy instruments, Dis- cussion Paper 01-58, Resources for the Future, Washington DC, 2001.
[21] National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Carbon taxes: a review of experience and pol- icy design considerations, Technical Report NREL/TP-6A2-47312, 2009.
[22] Hwang, J.J., Policy review of greenhouse gas emission reduction in Taiwan. Renew- able and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, pp. 1392–1402, 2011. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.08.010
[23] Moore, B. & Wustenhagen, R., Innovative and sustainable energy technologies: the role of venture capital. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13, pp. 235–245, 2004. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.413
[24] Enkvist, P., et al., A cost curve for greenhouse gas reduction. The McKinsey Quarterly: The Online Journal of McKinsey & Co., 2008.
[25] European Commission, Externalities of energy. a research project, 2006. Available at: http: //www.externe.info/externe_2006.
[26] Genon, G. & Brizio, E., Perspectives and limits for cement kilns as a destination for RDF. Waste Management, 28, pp. 2375–2385, 2008. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. wasman.2007.10.022
[27] Buonanno, G., et al., Dimensional and chemical characterization of particles at a down- wind receptor site of a waste-to-energy plant. Waste Management, 30, pp. 1325–1333, 2010. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.12.025
[28] Carreras-Sospedra, M., et al., Central power generation versus distributed generation – an air quality assessment in the South Coast Air Basin of California. Atmospheric Environ- ment, 44, pp. 3215–3223, 2010. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.05.017
[29] Panepinto, D. & Genon, G., Environmental balance study for the construction of a biomass plant in a small town in Piedmont (Northern Italy). WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 143, pp. 279–290, 2011. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/ esus110241
[30] Lopez, J.L. & Mandujano, C., Estimation of the impact in the air quality by the use of clean fuels (fuel oil versus natural gas). Catalysis Today, 106, pp. 176–179, 2005. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2005.07.173
[31] Schleisner, L., Comparison of methodologies for externality assessment. Energy Policy, 28, pp. 1127–1136, 2000. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0301-4215(00)00084-7
[32] World Energy Council, Comparison of Energy Systems Using Life Cycle Assessment, World Energy Council, London, 2004.