Toward Just and Sustainable Cities: Identifying Key Areas for Urban, Peri-Urban and Rural Sustainability Collaborative Initiatives

Toward Just and Sustainable Cities: Identifying Key Areas for Urban, Peri-Urban and Rural Sustainability Collaborative Initiatives

Eric Chapman Lauren Rogers Adam Kay

Department of Biology, University of Saint Thomas, USA

Available online: 
| Citation

© 2021 IIETA. This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license (



Increasing urbanization and changing population demographics represent two golden opportunities to reimagine how humanity may influence the trajectory of the planet. Although there is substantial information about ‘the speed in which we are falling off the cliff’ with respect to the negative effects of climate change, biodiversity loss, and nitrogen and phosphorus overuse, much less is known about how humanity may transition to living within sustainable ecological and social boundaries. Transitioning to global sustainability requires a framework that integrates both fundamental ecological boundaries with social foundations that provide basic needs. One such framework is Raworth’s Doughnut Model, where the doughnut indicates a ‘sweet spot’: meeting basic social needs of all within sustainable boundaries for earth-systems processes. While there are a global and a few national level analyses of sustainability using this framework, there are no regional level assessments. We used Raworth’s Doughnut Model to assess regional level sustainability for a mid-sized metropolitan area in the Midwestern United States. We pooled county data from government and non-profit reports to quantify social foundation and ecological boundary sustainability across one of the most populous regions in the upper Midwestern United States. Our regional doughnut analysis revealed many ecological overshoots and social deficits, and identified key areas for urban, peri-urban and rural sustainability collaborations. Our analysis also revealed the importance of geospatial variation in ecological boundary overshoot and social deficits. In many ways, our study system of the upper Midwestern United States is representative of city sizes of the future and understanding these trajectories of ecological and social parameters may inform future global sustainable pathways.


doughnut economics, peri-urban, rural, urban, urban sustainability


[1] P. M. Vitousek, H. A. Mooney, J. Lubchenco, J. M. Melillo, Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277, 494–499 (1997).

[2] P. M. Vitousek, et al., Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecological Applications 7, 737–750 (1997).

[3] D. L. Childers, J. Corman, M. Edwards, J. J. Elser, Sustainability challenges of phosphorus and food: solutions from closing the human phosphorus cycle. BioScience 61, 117–124 (2011).

[4] C. N. Johnson, et al., Biodiversity losses and conservation responses in the Anthropocene. Science 356, 270–275 (2017).

[5] E. F. Lambin, P. Meyfroidt, Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108, 3465–3472 (2011).

[6] J. Rockström, et al., A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461, 472–475 (2009).

[7] W. Steffen, et al., Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115, 8252–8259 (2018).

[8] Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing.

[9] R. I. McDonald, Global urbanization: can ecologists identify a sustainable way forward? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6, 99–104 (2008).

[10] N. Bymoen, N. Warner, Maximizing mobility: transportation efficiency and infrastructure development in the urban boundary rural area of Vancouver, Canada. Undergraduate Research and Innovation Conference (2018).

[11] J. Nivala, A. Zehnsdorf, M. van Afferden, R. A. Müller, “Green infrastructure for increased resource efficiency in urban water management” in Urban Transformations: Sustainable Urban Development Through Resource Efficiency, Quality of Life and Resilience, Future City., S. Kabisch, et al., Eds. (Springer International Publishing, 2018), pp. 133–143.

[12] J. R. Burger, et al., The macroecology of sustainability. PLoS Biology 10 (2012).

[13] D. W. O’Neill, A. L. Fanning, W. F. Lamb, J. K. Steinberger, A good life for all within planetary boundaries. Nature Sustainability 1, 88–95 (2018).

[14] Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. 2014 County Level NOx Emissions. Retrieved from

[15] US Geological Survey. 1987-2006. County-Level Estimates of Nitrogen and Phosphorus from Commercial Fertilizer for the Conterminous United States. Retrieved from

[16] US Geological Survey. 2015. USGS Water Use Data From Minnesota. Retrieved from

[17] Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources. 2019. Conservation Lands Summary Statewide. Retrieved from

[18] Minnesota Department of Health. 2015. County Level PM 2.5 Air Quality Query. Retrieved from

[19] Minnesota Department of Health. 2015. County Level O3 Air Quality Query. Retrieved from

[20] Feeding America Research. 2017. Overall and Child Food Insecurity by County. Retrieved from

[21] National Center for Health Statistics - Mortality Files. 2015-2017. Minnesota Life Expectancy. Retrieved from

[22] American Community Survey. 2018. Minnesota Education Data. Retrieved from

[23] US Census Bureau. 2006-2010 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Data. 2010. Retrieved from

[24] Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data. 2010. County-Level Detailed Arrest and Offense Data, United States. Retrieved from

[25] Minnesota Secretary of State, U.S. 2016. Voter Turnout By County.

[26] US Census Bureau. 2010. American Community Survey (ACS), 1-year estimates, table B19083. Retrieved from

[27] Minnesota Legislature Legislative Coordinating Commission. 2019. House and Senate District Information. Retrieved from

[28] Wilder Reserarch. 2015. Minnesota Homeless Study. Retrieved from

[29] Connected Nation. 2019. County Broadband Service. Retrieved from

[30] Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. 2017. Report on 2017 SCORE Programs. Retrieved from

[31] Minnesota Department of Health. 2017. Drinking Water Query. Retrieved from

[32] C. A. Lepczyk, et al., Biodiversity in the city: fundamental questions for understanding the ecology of urban green spaces for biodiversity conservation. BioScience 67, 799–807 (2017).

[33] E. Huddart-Kennedy, T. M. Beckley, B. L. McFarlane, S. Nadeau, Rural-urban differences in environmental concern in Canada. Rural Sociology 74, 309–329 (2009).

[34] J. F. Kenny, et al., Estimated use of water in the United States in 2005 (U.S. Geological Survey, 2009).

[35] J. T. Lehman, D. W. Bell, K. E. McDonald, Reduced river phosphorus following implementation of a lawn fertilizer ordinance. Lake and Reservoir Management 25, 307–312 (2009).

[36] R. W. Portmann, J. S. Daniel, A. R. Ravishankara, Stratospheric ozone depletion due to nitrous oxide: influences of other gases. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B Biological Sciences 367, 1256–1264 (2012).

[37] L. Seeliger, I. Turok, Towards sustainable cities: extending resilience with insights from vulnerability and transition theory. Sustainability 5, 2108–2128 (2013).

[38] A. Golub, K. Martens, Using principles of justice to assess the modal equity of regional transportation plans. Journal of Transport Geography 41, 10–20 (2014).

[39] D. Martin, H. Jordan, P. Roderick, Taking the bus: incorporating public transport time-table data into health care accessibility modelling. Environment and Planning A 40, 2510–2525 (2008).

[40] N. Paulley, et al., The demand for public transport: the effects of fares, quality of service, income and car ownership. Transport Policy 13, 295–306 (2006).