Home Journals ACSM Energy dissipation of the friction sliding isolation structure with MoS2 as the lubricating material

JOURNAL METRICS

Impact Factor (JCR) 2022: 0.8 ℹImpact Factor (JCR):

The JCR provides quantitative tools for ranking, evaluating, categorizing, and comparing journals. The impact factor is one of these; it is a measure of the frequency with which the “average article” in a journal has been cited in a particular year or period. The annual JCR impact factor is a ratio between citations and recent citable items published. Thus, the impact factor of a journal is calculated by dividing the number of current year citations to the source items published in that journal during the previous two years.

5-Year Impact Factor: 0.7 ℹ5-Year Impact Factor:

A 5-Year Impact Factor shows the long-term citation trend for a journal. This is calculated differently from the Journal Impact Factor, so it is not simply an average of the Impact Factors in the time period. The Impact Factor itself is based only on Web of Science Core Collection citation data from the last three years and thus reflects only recent impact. The Journal Impact Factor is the average number of times articles from the journal published in the past two years have been cited in the Journal Citation Reports year.

CiteScore 2022: 1.7 ℹCiteScore:

CiteScore is the number of citations received by a journal in one year to documents published in the three previous years, divided by the number of documents indexed in Scopus published in those same three years.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2022: 0.239 ℹSCImago Journal Rank (SJR):

The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2022: 0.464 ℹSource Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP):

SNIP measures a source’s contextual citation impact by weighting citations based on the total number of citations in a subject field. It helps you make a direct comparison of sources in different subject fields. SNIP takes into account characteristics of the source's subject field, which is the set of documents citing that source.

123.png

Energy dissipation of the friction sliding isolation structure with MoS2 as the lubricating material

Energy dissipation of the friction sliding isolation structure with MoS₂ as the lubricating material

Jiangle Li ^*| Sheliang Wang | Li Gao | Yanzhou Haok | Meng Zhan

School of civil Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, 13 Yanta Road, Beilin District, Xi’an 710055, China

College of Urban, Henan University of Urban Constuction, Longxiang Street, Xincheng District, Pingdingshan 467036, China

Corresponding Author Email:

30080206@hncj.edu.cn

Received:

| |

Accepted:

| | Citation

303-316.pdf

OPEN ACCESS

https://acsm.revuesonline.com/accueil.jsp

Abstract:

Considering the importance of friction coefficient in bearing performance and the good properties of MoS₂, this paper designs an innovative friction sliding isolation bearing with MoS₂ as the lubricating material. The relationship between the friction coefficient and the compressive stress was determined by fitting the results of a loading test, and the feasibility of the material was proved through a shaking table test on a five-layer concrete frame model. Based on the energy dissipation theory, the seismic behavior of the proposed friction sliding isolation structure was simulated on MATLAB/Simulink. The simulation results show that the entire structure had little displacement, despite the slight slippage of the isolation layer, under the simulated earthquake wave. The energy response at different friction coefficients shows that the total seismic energy input of the system increased with the friction coefficient. The change of the total seismic input was not obvious when the friction was up to 0.15. The research findings shed new light on the application of isolation devices in practical engineering

Keywords:

riction sliding isolation, energy dissipation, MoS₂, seismic response, shaking table test

1. Introduction

2. Design and loading test of sliding isolation bearing

3. Damping energy dissipation

4. Isolation layer energy dissipation

5. Conclusions

Acknowledgments

Thanks for the natural sciences foundation (51178388), the SHAN XI province industrial project (2013K07-07, 2014K06-34) and the SHAN XI province education department natural project(2013JK0612,14JK1420).

Basic Scientific Research of Central Colleges (No. 310841171001), Shaanxi Province Postdoctoral Research Project (No. 332100160021), Natural Science Research Projects of Shaanxi (2017JQ5061)

References

Existing M. Y. H. (2010). Codes on earthquake design with and without seismic devices and tabulated data. Earthquake Resistant Buildings, pp. 51-141. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-93818-7_2

Gur S., Mishra S. K. (2013). Multi-objective stochastic-structural-optimization of shape-memory-alloy assisted pure-friction bearing for isolating building against random earthquakes. Soil Dynamics & Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 54, pp. 1-16. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.07.013

Hong F., Feng Q. M. (1993). Analysis of earthquake reliability for structures with resilience-friction base isolation system. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 81-88.

Jankowski R., Mahmoud S. (2015). Pounding between buildings. Earthquake-Induced Structural Pounding, pp. 35-71. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16324-6_3

Liu H. Q., Wang X. Q., Wang J. L. (2008). Catastrophic seismic response of isolated structure based on laminated rubber bearings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 158-164.

Lu L. H., Xu Z. D., Shi C. F. (2007). Research status and development of structural sliding isolation technology. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, Vol. 27, pp. 243-246.

Ma G. W., Hao H., Lu Y. (2010). Modelling damage potential of high‐frequency ground motions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Vol. 32, No. 10, pp. 1483-1503. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.282

Mokha A., Constantinou M. C., Reinhom A. M., Zayas V. A. (1991). Experimental study of friction pendulum isolation system. Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 117, No. 6, pp. 1201-1218. http://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:4(1201)

Mostaghel N., Khodaverdian M. (1987). Dynamics of resilient-friction base isolator (R-FBI). Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 379-390. http://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290150307

Ponzo F. C., Cesare A. D., Leccese G., Nigro D. (2017). Shake table testing on restoring capability of double concave friction pendulum seismic isolation systems. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Vol. 46, No. 6, pp. 2337-2353. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2907

Su L., Ahmadi G. (1992). Probabilistic responses of base-isolated structures to El Centro 1940 and Mexico City 1985 earthquakes. Engineering Structures, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 217-230. http://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(92)90010-N

Xiong Z. M., Yu M. H., Wang Q. M. M., Feng D. G., Shui H. X., Shui G. F. (2003). Theoretical study on design and application on sliding base isolation structure. Journal of Vibration and Shock, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 50-54. http://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2003.03.015

Zayas V., Low S., Mahin S. A. (1990). A simple pendulum technique for achieving seismic isolation. Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 6, pp. 317-333. http://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585573

Zhou X. Y., Han M., Zeng D. M., Ma D. H. (1999). Calculation method of lateral stiffness of combined rubber bearing and serial system of bearing with columns. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 67-75. http://doi.org/10.1016/1359-0197(89)90099-4

IJHT
MMEP
ACSM
EJEE
ISI
I2M
JESA
RCMA
RIA
TS
IJSDP
IJSSE
IJDNE
JNMES
IJES
EESRJ
RCES
AMA_A
AMA_B
AMA_C
AMA_D
MMC_A
MMC_B
MMC_C
MMC_D

Username
Password
Remember me

Search form

Energy dissipation of the friction sliding isolation structure with MoS2 as the lubricating material