© 2020 IIETA. This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
OPEN ACCESS
The electrochemical discharge machining process (ECDM) is a hybrid advanced technology integrated with electrochemical and electrodischarge processes has used for the manufacturing of nonconducting along with conducting materials. The silicon carbide is nonconducting material which has widely used in various fields such as automobile, aviation, medical, nuclear reactor, and missile. The machining of silicon carbide is a challenging task by using nonconventional along with conventional machining processes due to its physical properties. The current research work shows the machining of Silicon carbide material by using fabricated ECDM machine setup with gunmetal tool material. The Taguchi L_{27} orthogonal array technique is applied for experimental work. The grey relational analysis optimization is applied for the investigation of optimum input factors for better output responses. The input process factors like electrolyte concentration, applied voltage, and rotation of tool and outcome results such as machined depth and the diameter of hole were checked after drilling of silicon carbide material. The experimental results indicate the electrolyte concentration is the leading factor for diameter of hole and depth of machined hole subsequent to voltage and tool rotation.
ECDM, hole diameter, machined depth, Silicon carbide, gunmetal, grey relational analysis
Silicon carbide is an amalgamated with carbon and silicon. It is the hardest material having an intense melting point of 2730℃. It is having various properties like high thermal conductivity, resistance to a chemical reaction, high hardness, wear resistance, lightweight, and corrosion resistance. This material is widely used in automobile industries, grinding wheels, refractory linings, cutting tools, aerospace, hightemperature bricks, wearresistant parts, and heating elements [1, 2]. The cutting of Silicon carbide is a challenging task with the traditional and nontraditional manufacturing processes. The electrochemical discharge machining (ECDM) technology has the amalgam process which can cut Silicon carbide material effectively. This process mingled with the electrochemical process (ECM) along with electrodischarge manufacturing (EDM) [3]. In the year of 1968, Kurafuji et al. had created originally ECDM process and this process was applied for machining of glass [4]. This machining technology can be utilized for performing the process of microdrilling, machining of cylindrical parts, slicing of glass rods, dressing of micro tools [5]. The application of this process is for producing microtexturing in microfluidic devices, digital micromirror devices, microelectromechanical systems, microscale fabrication of microfilters [6]. The important parameters of this process are transformation in wettability of the electrode, local Joule heating, hydrodynamic fluctuation, the combination of wettability, hydrodynamic effects, and bubble coalescence. The limitations of this process are machining efficiency, quality, and accuracy. In this process, gravity feed mechanism mostly applied to a workpiece or tool and used for machine workpiece due to the provision of steady connection which causes the machining output responses [7]. In the electrochemical discharge process at a higher level of concentration of electrolyte and applied voltage machining conditions which can accomplish microholes precisely and higher material removal rate [8]. The abrasive cathode tools in the ECDM gives maximum machining depth in machining conditions of the extreme applied voltage and concentration of electrolyte [9]. Similarly, The highquality holes produced with stable material removal can be achieved with the abrasive tool electrode it provides additional cutting action and electrical discharge during the ECDM process [10]. Arab et al. studied the influence of tool surface roughness on the heataffected zone and overcut during drilling in the glass substrate by ECDM. They found the lower surface roughness tool exhibited a thinner gas film which produces holes with low heat affected zone and overcut [11]. Yang et al. obtained better results as well as reduces machining time by a spherical end tool electrode. They observed that the spherical tool reduces the contact surface between the workpiece and electrode that promotes the flow of electrolyte to the tool end which creates efficient microhole drilling [12]. Bhattacharyya et al. found that at higher material removal rate (MRR) was achieved at maximum voltage and higher electrolyte concentration conditions and at a maximum concentration of electrolyte the overcut was higher for aluminium oxide ceramic material [13]. Liu et al. found that when an increase in duty cycle, the concentration of electrolyte, pulse duration, and current can improve the development of discharge action during machining of particulate reinforced metal matrix composite material [14]. Singh et al. produced micro holes on a silicon wafer. The found that hole taper and overcut rises with rise in voltage and reduces with raise in tool feed rate. The chemical action and spark phenomenon at tool is the key principle behind electron chemical erosion of the tool [15]. Laio et al. observed that adding surfactants in the electrolyte can raise current density which produces better quality and a less taper hole on quartz material [16]. Likewise, Dhanvijay et al. studied the influence of flow and without the flow of electrolyte in the ECDM process of fiberglass reinforced plastic material. They showed that moving of electrolyte given regularly fresh supply of electrolyte leads to the increase in hydrogen gas bubbles and therefore increase in material removal rate [17]. Antil et al. choosing a populationbased metaheuristic algorithm to achieved maximum material erosion rate of silicon carbide particle/glass fiber–reinforced polymer matrix composite during ECDM machining [18]. The Taguchi L_{9} orthogonal array method was used to experiments on silicon carbide material using a stainless tool in the ECDM process. In this report, Sarkar et al. found that electrolyte concentration was the most dominant factor for controlling radial overcut and material removal rate [19]. Pawar et al. reported previously ECDM machining of silicon carbide material using brass tool material and optimization of parameters using response surface methodology [20]. In this research work, a developed gravity feed mechanism applied to the ECDM setup has utilized for drilled hole on Silicon carbide with gunmetal tool material. The machining depth and hole diameter were investigated through input process factors such as rotation of tool, voltage, and concentration of electrolyte. The experiments were executed with the help of the Taguchi L_{27} orthogonal array technique and optimized parameters using grey relational analysis. Grey relational analysis is a good utilization of concerns with fuzzy uncertainty problems and therefore it is mostly used in the engineering field to obtained good outcomes [21].
The primary working mechanism of the electrochemical discharge machining is presented in Figure 1. The main components of this machine specifically anode, cathode, and workpiece material are dipped inside the electrolyte solution. In this process, the D.C. voltage is applied among anode and cathode tool electrodes, when voltage goes beyond 30 volts the electrolysis takes place at that instance. However, hydrogen gas bubbles are produced around cathode electrode and oxygen bubbles are produced around the anode tool electrode. At that instant the voltage is raised, suddenly current increases and a huge amount of bubbles are created a bubble layer nearby the anode and cathode. These bubbles made coalesce into a gas film layer nearby the cathode electrode during applied voltage is maximum than that of the critical voltage. At that existent bright spark is observed as well as electrical discharges happened and it causes removal of material [7].
The manufactured ECDM (Figure 2) machining setup was used to machined silicon carbide. All axes movements were controlled manually. The gravity feed system was applied to travel the silicon carbide plate in an upper movement amid the drilling process. The gunmetal (cathode) tool was mounted to the Zaxis. The cathode was connected to the machine motor shaft and its rotation was monitored using the Arduino Uno board interface to the laptop. The direct current (D.C.) voltage is provided among the anode and cathode electrodes [22]. The taper shape cathode tool electrode (Gunmetal) with diameter to 3 mm diameter of and stainless steel 416 anode tool electrode were used. In experimental research work, NaOH was utilized as electrolyte with machining cycle time for one experiment is 25 minutes.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of ECDM process
Figure 2. ECDM experimental setup
The electrochemical discharge machining process was used to produce microholes on silicon carbide material having a size of 150×150×10 mm^{3}. The experimental method has been done by using Taguchi L_{27} orthogonal technique. The reason for selecting Taguchi L_{27} orthogonal is because of deciding three parameters and their three various levels with two ways of interconnection hence, eighteen all degrees of freedom. So, the L_{27} orthogonal array method was applied for experimental work which provides 26 degrees of freedom. In current research work, applied voltage, tool rotation, and concentration of electrolytes were considered as input process factors and results are machined depth and drilled hole diameter. The input process factors with their specific levels depicted in Table 1 [23].
Table 1. Process parameters and their levels
Levels 
Parameters 


Voltage (V) 
Rotation of Tool (RPM) 
Electrolyte Concentration (%) 
1 
70 
0 
10 
2 
80 
10 
15 
3 
90 
50 
20 
In this research work signal to noise (S/N) ratio criteria was utilized as an analysis of experimental data. The signal represents the influence of every parameter on the outcome results, however, noise represents the measure of the influence of irregularity as of average outcome results. In this research, the diameter of hole was treated as nominal is best because the average diameter of hole outcome responses were examined and the diameter of hole 3.25 mm was assigned as the targeted nominal value. Similarly, in case of depth of machined hole higher the better precedent was selected. The S/N ratio was assessed with the help of given formula which is presented below in Eq. 1 and Eq. 2 [24].
For larger is better:
$S/N=10\mathop{\log }_{10}\left( \frac{1}{n}\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}{\frac{1}{\mathop{y}_{i}^{2}}} \right)$ (1)
$S/N=10\mathop{\log }_{10}\left( \frac{1}{n}\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}{\mathop{\sigma }^{2}} \right)$ (2)
where, n represents the number of measurements and y_{i} is the measured valueFor nominal is best:
It is observed that when the voltage applied between cathode and anode the bubbles generated because of electrochemically liberated H_{2} and water vapour created through ohmic heating at the cathode electrode interface. The isolation among the electrode and the electrolyte occurred. The isolation among the electrolyte and the electrode leads to discharge because of switching e.m.f. The large electric field source sparks inside the gas bubble isolating the tip. The spark has arisen between the inside surface of the electrolyte and the tip of the tool electrode. At the instant during sparks ensues, an avalanche of electrons initiated by ionization flow towards workpiece kept around 20 μm distance away from the tooltip. It is a drifting phenomenon of the electron avalanche and therefore this process is discrete and repetitive. The bombardment of electrons on the silicon carbide material surface results in intense heating due to the discharge process and therefore material removal takes place [25, 26]. Table 2 indicates the Taguchi L_{27} experimental conditions and their individual results. The individual sparking conditions for each experiment are shown in Table 3 during the machining of silicon carbide material. The intensity of spark was raised when the raising of concentration of electrolyte and voltage which produces enlarge in diameter of hole and machined depth.
The individual microscopic images of drilled holes on silicon carbide material with gunmetal tool electrode by the ECDM process are shown in Table 4. The tooltip can generate an indent at the starting of machining, which indications the tool in ECDM. The distribution of discharge energy is more uniform when the electrode rotates. On the other hand, a high tool rotation rate can deteriorate the discharge effect, thus dropping excessive sparks. A higher rotational rate avoids the discharge focuses on the same points and improves the dimensional precision of microholes. The rotation of the electrode clearly enhances the roundness of a microhole. When electrolysis is confined at the tooltip, the maximum number of the bubbles accomplished at the active tool exterior magnificently consolidate into a spherical dielectric gas film. The gas film thickness based on the geometry of the tool, i.e. exposure length and the tool radius, which is adequately equal to the tool depth in the electrolyte. It is observed that machining depth rises with the rise in applied voltage this is due to field emission law [8, 27, 28].
Table 2. Observations of experimental results of Silicon carbide through gunmetal tool electrode
No. 
Conc. of Elec. (%) 
Voltage (V) 
Rotation (rpm) 
Diameter of Hole (mm) 
Depth of Machined Hole (mm) 
1 
10 
70 
0 
1.96 
0.10 
2 
10 
70 
20 
2.20 
0.10 
3 
10 
70 
50 
2.78 
0.15 
4 
10 
80 
0 
2.54 
0.15 
5 
10 
80 
20 
2.69 
0.20 
6 
10 
80 
50 
2.87 
0.20 
7 
10 
90 
0 
2.70 
0.22 
8 
10 
90 
20 
2.82 
0.26 
9 
10 
90 
50 
3.21 
0.30 
10 
15 
70 
0 
2.88 
0.20 
11 
15 
70 
20 
3.11 
0.32 
12 
15 
70 
50 
3.04 
0.30 
13 
15 
80 
0 
3.28 
0.25 
14 
15 
80 
20 
3.42 
0.45 
15 
15 
80 
50 
3.50 
0.50 
16 
15 
90 
0 
3.47 
0.54 
17 
15 
90 
20 
3.72 
0.59 
18 
15 
90 
50 
3.85 
0.67 
19 
20 
70 
0 
3.10 
0.42 
20 
20 
70 
20 
3.35 
0.50 
21 
20 
70 
50 
3.76 
0.68 
22 
20 
80 
0 
3.83 
0.63 
23 
20 
80 
20 
4.02 
0.71 
24 
20 
80 
50 
4.15 
0.75 
25 
20 
90 
0 
3.91 
0.71 
26 
20 
90 
20 
4.32 
0.79 
27 
20 
90 
50 
4.85 
0.88 
Table 3. Spark intensities for each experimental conditions
Gunmetal Tool Electrode Experiments 

Rotation (rpm) 
Volt. 
Conc. 

0 
20 
50 
(V) 
(%) 
Table 4. Microscopic images of drilled hole on silicon carbide material through gunmetal tool
Gunmetal Tool Experimental Results 



Rotation (r/min) 
Volt. (V) 
Conc. (%) 

0 
20 
50 

Here, the influence of machining parameters for the machined hole of Silicon carbide through the gunmetal tool is explained. The ANOVA statistical method was utilized to evaluate how much influence of the input factors. The output response table for the signal to noise (S/N) ratios, higher the better criteria for machined depth was used for ranking of the input factors. The influence graph for S/N ratios for output response of machined depth is also explained.
4.1 ANOVA for depth of machined hole
The ANOVA for the depth of the machined hole for Silicon carbide through the gunmetal tool electrode with the condition of higher the better is shown in Table 5. It shows that the largest Fvalue 165.93 was found for the concentration of electrolyte which indicates the most powerful parameters as compared to the remaining two input factors. The depth of machined hole raised with raising the concentration of electrolytic from 15 to 20 percentage. It is also noticed that the depth of machined hole outcome responses were identical trends to earlier published papers by researchers [2830]. The three input factors were a noticeable effect on the depth of machined hole due to the reason of P values are lower than 0.05. The concentration of electrolyte is provided 72.17%, the applied voltage is provided 17.96%, and tool rotation is provided 5.53% successively. The response Table 6 for the S/N ratios of the depth of machined hole of silicon carbide material through the gunmetal tool which represents that concentration of the electrolyte is the first rank be subsequent to applied voltage and tool rotation.
Table 5. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) table for depth of machined hole through gunmetal tool electrode
Source 
DF 
Adj. SS 
Adj. MS 
F Value 
P Value 
Percentage Contribution 
Applied Voltage 
2 
0.267 
0.133 
41.29 
0.00 
17.96 
Conc. of Electrolyte 
2

1.071 
0.535 
165.93 
0.00 
72.17 
Rotation Speed 
2 
0.082 
0.041 
12.71 
0.00 
5.53 
Error 
20 
0.064 
0.003 


4.34 
Total 
26 
1.484 



100 
Table 6. Response for signal to noise (S/N) ratios of depth of machined hole
Level 
Voltage 
Electrolyte Concentration 
Rotation Speed 
1 
11.969 
15.136 
10.614 
2 
8.769 
8.083 
8.682 
3 
6.095 
3.614 
7.537 
Delta 
5.874 
11.522 
3.077 
Rank 
2 
1 
3 
4.2 Effect on the depth of machined hole through gunmetal tool
Figure 3 i.e. main effect plot indicates that the depth of machined hole raises noticeably with the rise in the concentration of electrolyte, voltage, and tool rotation. The highest depth of the machined hole was found at input parameters conditions of concentration of electrolyte of 20% applied voltage 90 V, and rotation of the tool of 50 r/min. The identical graphical results were obtained to earlier research papers for glass and Sodalime glass material [31, 32]. The material erosion of Silicon carbide raises with the rise in voltage and electrolyte concentration [33].
Figure 3. Main effect plot for the machined depth of Silicon carbide through Gunmetal tool material
Figure 4. Diameter of hole plot for Silicon carbide through gunmetal tool electrode
This section discussed the analysis of variance table for the diameter of hole for silicon carbide material through gunmetal tool. The nominal is better criteria is chosen for the response table for means of diameter hole. Also, elucidated the main effect graph for the diameter of hole of silicon carbide through the gunmetal electrode.
5.1 ANOVA for the diameter of hole
The nominal is the best criteria applied to the diameter of hole of silicon carbide through gunmetal tool material and analysis of variance results for given conditions is shown in Table 7. It shows that the largest F value 160.80 found for the concentration of electrolyte which represents it is the powerful parameter compared to the remaining two input parameters. The p values denote that all input factor values are less than 0.05 which shows that all parameters are noticeable. The concentration of the electrolyte is provided 64.80%, the applied voltage is 22.00% and tool rotation is provided 9.17% contributions respectively. The results achieved has very much similar to already published papers by authors for the diameter of hole and radial overcut for glass workpiece material [8, 9, 28, 30, 34]. The response table for means of the diameter of hole on silicon carbide through the gunmetal tool is shown in Table 8. It represents that the concentration of electrolyte is the first rank be subsequent to applied voltage and tool rotation.
Table 7. ANOVA table for hole diameter of Silicon carbide through Gunmetal electrode
Source 
DF 
Adj. SS 
Adj. MS 
F Value 
P Value 
Percentage Contribution 
Voltage 
2 
2.517 
1.259 
54.60 
0.000 
22.00 
Electrolyte Conc. 
2

7.413

3.707

160.80

0.000

64.80 
Rotation Speed 
2 
1.049

0.525

22.76 
0.000 
9.17 
Error 
20 
0.461 
0.0231 


4.03 
Total 
26 
11.440 



100 
Table 8. Response table for the mean of hole diameter of Silicon carbide through gunmetal tool
Level 
Voltage 
Electrolyte Concentration 
Rotation Speed 
1 
2.909 
2.641 
3.074 
2 
3.367 
3.363 
3.294 
3 
3.650 
3.921 
3.557 
Delta 
0.741 
1.280 
0.482 
Rank 
2 
1 
3 
5.2 Effect of machining factors on the diameter of hole
The diameter of hole rises noticeably with the rise in the concentration of electrolyte, voltage and tool rotation linearly which is represented in Figure 4. The large hole diameter accomplished at machining factors combination of applied voltage 90 V, the concentration of electrolyte 20% and the tool rotation of 50 r/min. The identical graphical results were accomplished in the earlier research paper for glass and Sodalime glass materials [9, 30].
The grey relational analysis theory was firstly presented by Prof. Deng in the year 1982 has been extensively utilized to distinct applications. It is appropriate for cope with uncertain information, incomplete and poor data as well as it is a multiobjective optimization technique. This theory is applicable to determine problems with convoluted interrelationships among variables and multiple parameters [35, 36]. The “grey” word in the term can be described as an attribute among black and white. Thus, “black” indicates desired data is not specifically available; on the contrary “white” means desired data is specifically available. “Grey” theory implied that relation among black with white. Thus, the grey theory supports only the intrinsic structure having limited data [37, 38]. The desirability criterion optimum ECDM drilling process through the gunmetal tool is the maximum depth of machined hole and the nominal diameter of hole. The responses quality characteristics i.e. machining depth and hole diameter were analyzed for experimental results preprocessing depends upon the ‘higher the better’ and “nominal the best’ criterion.
6.1 The calculating process of grey relational analysis
The following are steps used for the calculation of grey relational analysis.
Step I: Find out the assessed statistics and transform the new statistics. Then, to exclude the different measurements of the new statistics and transform them into statistics that can be related to all statistics.
Step II: Calculate the statistics sequence for reference. Then the reference sequence was chosen depending on the particular application.
Step III: Evaluate the complete variance and the maximum and minimum values of the related factor among the reference statistics sequence and the statistics sequence of every assessed object then evaluate the interrelationship coefficients of both sequences
Step IV: Evaluate the grey correlation degree. The calculation of mean of the correspondence coefficient among the statistics ratio of every position and the related factors of the reference order is assessed as the grey correlation degree of both orders to reveal the connection among the reference orders as well as the evaluation objects.
Step V: Locate entirely grey correspondence degrees in the related to order from small to large and from large to small [39].
6.2 Data preprocessing
In the grey relational analysis optimization method, response results preprocessing is needed as the assortment and entity in one experimental result sequence can vary against the remaining results. It is required while the sequence scatters extent is huge. In this method, the data is transferring the original order to a proportionate order. Thus, the output responses are normalized in the span from zero to one. The various approaches were used for investigating experimental results preprocessing as the grey relational analysis. These approaches are given below [40].
6.3 Grey relational generating
The original order along with the order of assessment usually defined as $x_{0}$ (k) and $x_{i}$ (k), i=1, 2, 3...., m; k=1, 2, 3..., n accordingly. While, m is the total number of experiments, where n is the number of all experimental data. The $x_{i}^{*}$ (k) is the value after Grey relation generating. If the objective value of the original order is larger the better then the original order is normalized with respect to Eq. 3 is given below [35, 37, 40]. In the data preprocessing step, Eq. 3 is used to obtain normalized results for machining depth. Eq. 5 is used to evaluate normalized results for hole diameter.
$x_{i}^{*}(k)=\frac{x_{i}^{0}(k)\min x_{i}^{0}(k)}{\max x_{i}^{0}(k)\min x_{i}^{0}(k)}$ (3)
$x_{i}^{*}(k)=\frac{\max x_{i}^{0}(k)x_{i}^{0}(k)}{\max x_{i}^{0}(k)\min x_{i}^{0}(k)}$ (4)
In the case, there is a target value the original sequence is normalized as specified below Eq. 5. OB is the target value.Similarly, if it is 'smallerthebetter', then the original sequence is normalized as Eq. 4.
$x_{i}^{*}(k)=1\frac{\left x_{i}^{0}(k)OB \right}{\max \{x_{i}^{0}(k)OB;OB\min x_{i}^{0}(k)\}}$ (5）
Here, $\Delta_{0 i}(k)$ is a deviation order between $x_{0}^{*}(k)$ reference sequence and $x_{i}^{*}(k)$ comparable sequence. This deviation sequence is assessed with the help of Eq. 6.
6.4 Deviation sequence
${{\Delta }_{0i}}(k)=\left x_{0}^{*}(k)x_{i}^{*}(k) \right$ （6）
Likewise, the largest deviation and the minimal deviation are evaluated as in Eq. 7 and Eq. 8.
$\mathop{\Delta }_{\max }=\underset{\forall j\in i}{\mathop{\max }}\,\underset{\forall k}{\mathop{\max }}\,\left x_{0}^{*}(k)x_{j}^{*}(k) \right$ （7）
$\mathop{\Delta }_{\min }=\underset{\forall j\in i}{\mathop{\min }}\,\underset{\forall k}{\mathop{\min }}\,\left x_{0}^{*}(k)x_{j}^{*}(k) \right$ （8）
$\sum_{k=1}^{n} \beta_{k}=1$ here, the Grey relational grade $\gamma\left(x_{0}^{*}, x_{i}^{*}\right)$ denotes the level of correlation among the reference and the comparability order. The maximum grey relational grade denotes enhance product quality; thus, based on grey relational grade, the factor influence can be assessed and the optimal level for an individual factors can also be evaluated [41, 42].
6.5 Grey relational coefficient
Grey relational coefficient is utilized for evaluating how close $x_{0}^{*}(k)$ is to $x_{i}^{*}(k)$ . The bigger the grey relational coefficient, the closer $x_{0}^{*}(k)$ and $x_{i}^{*}(k)$ . The grey relational coefficient can be evaluated by Eq. 9. The identification coefficient ζ taking a value 0.5 was substituted in Eq. 9 to find out the grey relational coefficient for the individual experiment.
$\gamma \left[ x_{0}^{*}(k),x_{i}^{*}(k) \right]=\frac{\Delta \min +\xi \Delta \max }{\Delta {{x}_{i}}(k)+\xi \Delta \max }$ （9）
where, $\xi$ is the distinguishing coefficient in [0, 1].
$0\text{}\gamma \left[ x_{0}^{*}(k),x_{i}^{*}(k) \right]\le 1$ （10）
Table 9. Grey relational analysis of Silicon carbide using Gunmetal tool material
No. 
Normalised Value 
Deviation sequence 
Grey relation coefficient 
Grade 
Rank 


Machined Depth 
Hole Diameter 
Machined Depth 
Hole Diameter 
Machined Depth 
Hole Diameter 

1 
0.0000 
0.0000 
1.0000 
1.0000 
0.3333 
0.3333 
0.3333 
27 
2 
0.0000 
0.0830 
1.0000 
0.9170 
0.3333 
0.3529 
0.3431 
26 
3 
0.0641 
0.2837 
0.9359 
0.7163 
0.3482 
0.4111 
0.3797 
24 
4 
0.0641 
0.2007 
0.9359 
0.7993 
0.3482 
0.3848 
0.3665 
25 
5 
0.1282 
0.2526 
0.8718 
0.7474 
0.3645 
0.4008 
0.3827 
23 
6 
0.1282 
0.3149 
0.8718 
0.6851 
0.3645 
0.4219 
0.3932 
21 
7 
0.1538 
0.2561 
0.8462 
0.7439 
0.3714 
0.4019 
0.3867 
22 
8 
0.2051 
0.2976 
0.7949 
0.7024 
0.3861 
0.4158 
0.4010 
19 
9 
0.2564 
0.4325 
0.7436 
0.5675 
0.4021 
0.4684 
0.4352 
15 
10 
0.1282 
0.3183 
0.8718 
0.6817 
0.3645 
0.4231 
0.3938 
20 
11 
0.2821 
0.3979 
0.7179 
0.6021 
0.4105 
0.4537 
0.4321 
16 
12 
0.2564 
0.3737 
0.7436 
0.6263 
0.4021 
0.4439 
0.4230 
18 
13 
0.1923 
0.4567 
0.8077 
0.5433 
0.3824 
0.4793 
0.4308 
17 
14 
0.4487 
0.5052 
0.5513 
0.4948 
0.4756 
0.5026 
0.4891 
13 
15 
0.5128 
0.5329 
0.4872 
0.4671 
0.5065 
0.5170 
0.5117 
11 
16 
0.5641 
0.5225 
0.4359 
0.4775 
0.5342 
0.5115 
0.5229 
10 
17 
0.6282 
0.6090 
0.3718 
0.3910 
0.5735 
0.5612 
0.5673 
9 
18 
0.7308 
0.6540 
0.2692 
0.3460 
0.6500 
0.5910 
0.6205 
6 
19 
0.4103 
0.3945 
0.5897 
0.6055 
0.4588 
0.4523 
0.4555 
14 
20 
0.5128 
0.4810 
0.4872 
0.5190 
0.5065 
0.4907 
0.4986 
12 
21 
0.7436 
0.6228 
0.2564 
0.3772 
0.6610 
0.5700 
0.6155 
7 
22 
0.6795 
0.6471 
0.3205 
0.3529 
0.6094 
0.5862 
0.5978 
8 
23 
0.7821 
0.7128 
0.2179 
0.2872 
0.6964 
0.6352 
0.6658 
4 
24 
0.8333 
0.7578 
0.1667 
0.2422 
0.7500 
0.6737 
0.7118 
3 
25 
0.7821 
0.6747 
0.2179 
0.3253 
0.6964 
0.6059 
0.6511 
5 
26 
0.8846 
0.8166 
0.1154 
0.1834 
0.8125 
0.7316 
0.7721 
2 
27 
1.0000 
1.0000 
0.0000 
0.0000 
1.0000 
1.0000 
1.0000 
1 
Table 10. Response table for average grey relational grade
Parameter 
Level 1 
Level 2 
Level 3 
Maxmin 
Rank 
Applied voltage 
0.4305 
0.5055 
0.5952 
0.1647 
2 
Electrolyte Conc. 
0.3802 
0.4879 
0.6631 
0.2829 
1 
Tool Rotation 
0.4598 
0.5058 
0.5656 
0.1058 
3 
6.6 Grey relational grade
Grey relational grade is the addition of Grey Relational coefficients and it is denoted in Eq. 11.
$\gamma (x_{0}^{*},x_{i}^{*})=\sum\limits_{k=1}^{n}{\mathop{\beta }_{k}\gamma \left[ x_{0}^{*}(k),x_{i}^{*}(k) \right]}$ （11）
The individual ranking of experiments was evaluated by using grey relational grade equation number 11. The normalized values, deviation sequence, grey relational coefficient, grey relational grade, and ranking has been depicted in Table 9. The Taguchi grey relational analysis approach was used to attained grey relational grades to achieve the combination of the optimal factors for multiobjective optimization. The values of the grey relational grade for voltage, electrolyte concentration and tool rotation at level 1 to level 3 were calculated which is shown in Table 10 [4143].
The mean of the chosen grey relational grade was evaluated using the following formula no. 12 for electrolyte concentration level 1 and assembled to make a response table which is shown in Table 10. The grades in the response table deal with to check the relationship among the comparability order and reference order of grey relational analysis. The maximum values of the average grey relational grade imply a strong correlation. Hence, from Table 10, it is the combination of optimal parameters which maximize all response. Table 10 shows that maximum grey relational grades exist for level 3 of applied voltage, electrolyte concentration and tool rotation means the optimal combination is the voltage of 90 V, electrolyte concentration of 20 % and tool rotation of 50 rpm.
$Electrolyte..Conc..(L.1)\text{=}\frac{\begin{align}& \text{0}\text{.3333}+0.3431+0.3797+0.3665+0.3827+ \\& 0.3932+0.3867+0.401+0.4352 \\ \end{align}}{9}$ (12)
The fabricated ECDM machine setup was used to machined silicon carbide material. In this research work, the output responses such as depth of machined hole and diameter of the hole were investigated by in view of the three input parameters like electrolyte concentration, applied voltage, and rotation of the tool. The experiments were executed with the ECDM on the silicon carbide workpiece through the gunmetal electrode. The grey relational multiobjective optimization technique coupled with Taguchi L_{27} was utilized to identify the optimum input factors for better output responses. The grey relational multiobjective optimization technique results show that the concentration of electrolyte was the most powerful factor for the depth of machined hole and diameter of hole subsequent to voltage and rotation of the tool. The optimum input machining parameters for the maximum depth of machined hole and the nominal value for the diameter of hole are voltage 90 V, the concentration of electrolyte 20%, and tool rotation 50 rpm. Further, present research findings on the ECDM technology can be utilized for different machining operations on Silicon carbide material according to requirements of various engineering fields with the help of various types of tool materials. The different types of optimization techniques can also be used to optimized output responses.
ECDM 
Electrochemical discharge machining 
ECM 
Electrochemical machining 
EDM S/N ratios 
Electro discharge machining Signal to Noise ratios 
ANOVA 
Analysis of variance 
[1] Eom, J.H., Kim, Y.W., Raju, S. (2013). Processing and properties of macroporous silicon carbide ceramics: A review. Journal of Asian Ceramic Societies, 1(3): 220242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jascer.2013.07.003
[2] Pawar, P., Ballav, R., Kumar, A. (2017). Machining Processes of silicon carbide: A review. Reviews on Advanced Materials Science, 51(1): 6276.
[3] Goud, M., Sharma, A.K., Jawalkar, C. (2016). A review on material removal mechanism in electrochemical discharge machining (ECDM) and possibilities to enhance the material removal rate. Precision Engineering, 45: 117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.01.007
[4] Kurafuji, H., Suda, K. (1968). Electrical discharge drilling of glass. Annals of the CIRP, 16: 415–419.
[5] Singh, T., Dvivedi, A. (2016). Developments in electrochemical discharge machining: A review on electrochemical discharge machining, process variants and their hybrid methods. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 105: 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2016.03.004
[6] Pawar, P., Ballav, R., Kumar, A. (2018). FEM Analysis of Different Materials Based on Explicit Dynamics ANSYS in Electrochemical Discharge Machine. In: U. Dixit, R. Kant. (eds), Simulations for Design and Manufacturing. Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering, Springer, Singapore, pp. 231258. https://doi.org/10.1007/9789811085185_9
[7] Wuthrich, R., Fascio, V. (2005). Machining of nonconducting materials using electrochemical discharge phenomenonan overview. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 45(9): 10951108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.11.011
[8] Yang, C.T., Ho, S.S., Yan, B.H. (2001). Micro hole machining of borosilicate glass through electrochemical discharge machining (ECDM). Key Engineering Materials, 196: 149166. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.196.149
[9] Jain, V.K., Choudhury, S.K., Ramesh, K.M. (2002). On the machining of alumina and glass. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 42(11): 12691276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S00323861(02)002410
[10] Chak, S.K., Rao, P.V. (2007). Trepanning of Al2O3 by electrochemical discharge machining (ECDM) process using abrasive electrode with pulsed DC supply. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 47(14): 20612070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.05.009
[11] Arab, J., Kannojia, H.K., Dixit, P. (2019). Effect of tool electrode roughness on the geometric characteristics of throughholes formed by ECDM. Precision Engineering, 60: 437447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2019.09.008
[12] Yang, C.K., Wu, K.L., Hung, J.C., Lee, S.M., Lin, J.C., Yan, B.H. (2011). Enhancement of ECDM efficiency and accuracy by spherical tool electrode. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 51(6): 528535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.03.001
[13] Bhattacharyya, B., Doloi, B.N., Sorkhel, S.K. (1999). Experimental investigations into electrochemical discharge machining (ECDM) of nonconductive ceramic materials. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 95(13): 145154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S09240136(99)003180
[14] Liu, J.W., Yue, T.M., Guo, Z.N. (2010). An analysis of the discharge mechanism in electrochemical discharge machining of particulate reinforced metal matrix composites. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 50(1): 8696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.09.004
[15] Singh, M., Singh, S., Kumar, S. (2019). Experimental investigation for generation of microholes on silicon wafer using electrochemical discharge machining process. Silicon, 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633019002738
[16] Laio, Y.S., Wu, L.C., Peng, W.Y. (2013). A study to improve drilling quality of electrochemical discharge machining (ECDM) process. Procedia CIRP, 6: 609614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.03.105
[17] Dhanvijay, M.R., Kulkarni, V.A., Doke, A. (2019). Experimental investigation and analysis of electrochemical discharge machining (ECDM) on fiberglass reinforced plastic (FRP). Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C, 100(5): 763769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s4003201900524y
[18] Antil, P., Singh, S., Singh, S., Prakash, C., Pruncu, C.I. (2019). Metaheuristic approach in machinability evaluation of silicon carbide particle/glass fiber–reinforced polymer matrix composites during electrochemical discharge machining process. Measurement and Control, 52(78): 11671176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020294019858216
[19] Sarkar, B.R., Doloi, B., Bhattacharyya, B. (2017). Investigation on electrochemical discharge micromachining of silicon carbide. International Journal of Materials Forming and Machining Processes (IJMFMP), 4(2): 2944. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMFMP.2017070103
[20] Pawar, P., Ballav, R., Kumar, A. (2019). Analysis of machining for silicon carbide on electrochemical discharge machining with brass tool. International Journal of Modern Manufacturing Technologies, 11(1): 8694.
[21] Shang, H. (2020). Model and algorithms of enterprise informatization software selection based on grey relational analysis. Ingénierie des Systèmes d’Information, 25(1): 107112. https://doi.org/10.18280/isi.250114
[22] Pawar, P., Ballav, R., Kumar, A. (2018). Development and manufacturing of arduino based electrochemical discharge machine. Journal of Machine Engineering, 18(1): 4560. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0010.8822
[23] Pinar, A.M., Uluer, O., Kırmaci, V. (2009). Optimization of counter flow Ranque–Hilsch vortex tube performance using Taguchi method. International Journal of Refrigeration, 32(6): 14871494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2009.02.018
[24] Roy, A., Nath, N., Nedelcu, D. (2017). Experimental investigation on variation of output responses of as cast TiNiCu shape memory alloys using wire EDM. International Journal of Modern Manufacturing Technologies, 9(1): 90–101.
[25] Basak, I., and Ghosh, A. (1997). Mechanism of material removal in electrochemical discharge machining: a theoretical model and experimental verification. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 71(3): 350359. https://doi.org/10.1016/S09240136(97)000976
[26] Kulkarni A.V. (2007). Electrochemical discharge machining process. Defence Science Journal, 57(5): 765770. https://doi.org/10.14429/dsj.57.1812
[27] Han, M.S., Min, B.K., Lee, S.J. (2009). Geometric improvement of electrochemical discharge microdrilling using an ultrasonicvibrated electrolyte. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 19(6): 065004. https://doi.org/10.1088/09601317/19/6/065004
[28] Wei, C., Ni, J., Hu, D. (2010). Electrochemical discharge machining using microdrilling tools. Transactions of NAMRI/SME, 38: 105111.
[29] Wuthrich, R., Spaelter, U., Wu, Y., Bleuler, H. (2006). A systematic characterization method for gravityfeed microhole drilling in glass with spark assisted chemical engraving (SACE). Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 16(9): 18911896. https://doi.org/10.1088/09601317/16/9/019
[30] Razfar, M.R., Ni, J., Behroozfar, A., Lan, S. (2013). An investigation on electrochemical discharge microdrilling of glass. In ASME 2013 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference collocated with the 41st North American Manufacturing Research Conference, V002T03A013V002T03A013. https://doi.org/10.1115/MSEC20131135
[31] Paul, L., Hiremath, S. (2014). Evaluation of process parameters of ECDM using grey relational analysis. Procedia Materials Science, 5: 22732282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.446
[32] Goud, M., Sharma, A.K. (2017). On performance studies during micromachining of quartz glass using electrochemical discharge machining. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 31(3): 13651372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1220601702368
[33] Chak, S.K., Rao, P.V. (2014). Machining of SiC by ECDM process using different electrode configurations under the effect of pulsed DC. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 28 (1/2/3): 3959. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMTM.2014.064629
[34] Gao, C., Liu, Z., Li, A. (2014). Study of micro drilling on pyrex glass using spark assisted chemical engraving. Micro and Nanosystems, 6(1): 2633. https://doi.org/10.2174/1876402905666131112201358
[35] Kuo, Y., Yang, T., Huang, G.W. (2008). The use of grey relational analysis in solving multiple attribute decisionmaking problems. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 55(1): 8093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2007.12.002
[36] Porwal, R.K., Yadava, V., Ramkumar, J. (2013). Multiobjective optimization of hole drilling electrical discharge micromachining process using grey relational analysis coupled with principal component analysis. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C, 94(4): 317325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s4003201300789
[37] Ertugrul, I., Oztas, T., Ozcil, A., Oztas, G.Z. (2016). Grey relational analysis approach in academic performance comparison of university: A case study of Turkish universities. European Scientific Journal, Special Edition: 128139.
[38] Dhal, P.R., Datta, S., Mahapatra, S.S. (2011). Flexible manufacturing system selection based on grey relation under uncertainty. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 8(4): 516534. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSOM.2011.039667
[39] Wang, X.L. (2019). Application of grey relation analysis theory to choose high reliability of the network node. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, 1237(3): 032056. https://doi.org/10.1088/17426596/1237/3/032056
[40] Hasani, H., Tabatabaei, S.A., Amiri, G. (2012). Grey relational analysis to determine the optimum process parameters for openend spinning yarns. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, 7(2): 8186. https://doi.org/10.1177/155892501200700212
[41] Haq, A.N., Marimuthu, P., Jeyapaul, R. (2008). Multi response optimization of machining parameters of drilling Al/SiC metal matrix composite using grey relational analysis in the Taguchi method. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 37(34): 250255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s0017000709814
[42] Jung, J.H., Kwon, W.T. (2010). Optimization of EDM process for multiple performance characteristics using Taguchi method and Grey relational analysis. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 24(5): 10831090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1220601003058
[43] Antil, P., Singh, S., Manna, A. (2018). Electrochemical discharge drilling of SiC reinforced polymer matrix composite using Taguchi’s grey relational analysis. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 43(3): 12571266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1336901728226