OPEN ACCESS
City growth must be carefully planned, in order to deal with the relevant hydrological changes, caused by urbanisation effects. Frequently, the increasing of the impervious surface areas is the major cause of urban floods aggravation. For this reason, new urban drainage design concepts have been researched in the recent decades, looking for a more sustainable stormwater management approach. The concept of sustainability in urban drainage implies that floods may not be transferred to downstream and that drainage systems must be planned considering urban development along time. Storage and infiltration measures, distributed over the watershed and integrated with urban landscape, should be introduced to reduce flood peaks and reorganise flood flow patterns. Following this path, the concept of low impact development (LID) may be a reference for urban drainage projects of new housing subdivisions. This concept tends to produce built environments with minor hydrological changes, trying to preserve or recover natural flow conditions prior to the urbanisation. In this con-text, this paper aims to discuss the problems related to urban flood in a conceptual, but practical, perspective, comparing different alternatives of drainage design for urban areas in a development process. In particular, a case study in the neighbourhood of Guaratiba, at Rio de Janeiro City, Brazil, will be developed. This region is under an increasing urban growth pressure, but it is still possible to plan and design an alternative occupation. Basically, two approaches were compared: a traditional end of pipe design concept and an alternative sustain-able design approach, based on the LID concept. The effects of the LID flood control measures were analysed and compared, applied in both public and private areas of a new urban subdivision project. A critical storm event was considered for the local scale and for Cabuçu River, which is the receiving water body for the local drainage system. The combined use of infiltration and storage measures was able to recover flood peaks. The pre-urbanisation values were approximately reproduced, both for the local and the basin scales, although peak times were not recovered.
low impact development, urban site development, sustainable urban drainage, fl ood control, math-ematical modelling
[1] O’Driscoll, M., Clinton, S., Jefferson, A., Manda, A. & McMillan, S., Urbanization effects on watershed hydrology and in-stream processes in the southern United States. Water, 2(3): pp. 605–648, 2010. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w2030605
[2] Caputo, U., Moura, P. & Nascimento, N., Evaluating the implementation of infiltration trenches in areas with consolidated urbanization: case of Belo Horizonte, Brazil. 12th ICUD Conference, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 2011.
[3] Andoh, R.Y.G. & Iwugo, K.O., Sustainable urban drainage systems: a UK perspective, 9th ICUD Conference, Portland, OR, USA, 2002.
[4] Baptista, M., Nascimento, N. & Barraud, S., Compensatory Techniques on Urban Drainage. ABRH: Porto Alegre, Brazil, 2005 (in Portuguese).
[5] US EPA – United States Environmental Protection Agency. Low Impact Development – A Literature Review. EPA-841-B-00-005. Office of Water: Washington, DC, 2000.
[6] France, R.L., Handbook of Water Sensitive Planning and Design. Lewis: Washington, DC, 2000.
[7] Coffman, L.S., Cheng, M., Weinstein, N. & Clar, M. Low-impact development hydrologic analysis and design. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference on Water Resources Planning and Management. American Society of Civil Engineering: Chicago, IL, New York:, pp. 1–8, 1998.
[8] Miguez, M.G., Mascarenhas, F.C.B. & Magalhães, L.P.C., Multifunctional landscapes for urban flood control in developing countries. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning. 2(2), pp. 153–166, 2007. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V2-N2-153-166
[9] Dietz, M.E., Low impact development practices: a review of current research and recommen-dations for future directions. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 186(1e4), pp. 351–363, 2007.
[10] Hood, M.J., Clausen, J.C. & Warner, G.S., Comparison of stormwater lag times for low impact and traditional residential development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 43(4), pp. 1036–1046, 2007. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00085.x
[11] Stahre, P., 15 Years Experiences of Sustainable Urban Storm Drainage in the City of Malmo, Sweden. World Water and Environmental Resources Congress: Alaska, 2005.
[12] Walsh, T. & Pomeroy, C., Decentralization of LID (i.e. Municipal Rainwater Harvesting Pro-gram) for Reducing Stormwater Runoff. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2012: Crossing Boundaries, New Mexico, USA, 2012.
[13] Davis, A.L., Green engineering principles promote low impact development. Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, pp. 338A–344A, 2005.
[14] Fassman, E.A. & Blackbourn, S., Urban runoff mitigation by a permeable pavement system over impermeable soils. J. Hydrol. Eng., 15, pp. 475–485, 2010. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/ (ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000238
[15] Gregoire, B.G. & Clausen, J.C., Effect of a modular extensive green roof on stormwater run-off and water quality. Ecol. Eng., 37, pp. 963–969, 2011. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eco-leng.2011.02.004
[16] United States Department of Defense – USDoD, Unifi ed Facilities Criteria (UFC) Design: Low Impact Development Manual. USDoD: USA, 2004.
[17] Ahiablame, L.M., Engel, B.A. & Chaubey, I., Effectiveness of low impact development prac-tices: literature review and suggestions for future research. Water, Air & Soil Pollution, 223(7), pp. 4253–4273, 2012. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11270-012-1189-2
[18] WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 155, © 2012 WIT Press doi: 10.2495/SC120391. www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3541 (on-line). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/ SC120391
[19] Google Earth, www.google.com/earth.
[20] Mascarenhas, F.C.B., Toda, K., Miguez, M.G. & Inoue, K., Flood Risk Simulation. WIT Press: Southampton, Boston, 436pp, 2005.
[21] Miguez, M.G., Flow cell mathematical model to urban catchments. D.Sc. Thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 301pp, 2001 (in Portuguese).