OPEN ACCESS
Prioritising improvement and maintenance activities is an important part of the production management and development process. Companies need to direct their efforts to the production constraints (bottlenecks) to achieve higher productivity. The first step is to identify the bottlenecks in the production system. A majority of the current bottleneck detection techniques can be classified into two categories, based on the methods used to develop the techniques: analytical and simulation based. Analytical methods are difficult to use in more complex multi-stepped production systems, and simulation-based approaches are time-consuming and less flexible with regard to changes in the production system. This research paper introduces a real-time, data-driven algorithm, which examines the average active period of the machines (the time when the machine is not waiting) to identify the bottlenecks based on real-time shop floor data captured by Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES). The method utilises machine state information and the corresponding time stamps of those states as recorded by MES. The algorithm has been tested on a real-time MES data set from a manufacturing company. The advantage of this algorithm is that it works for all kinds of production systems, including flow-oriented layouts and parallel-systems, and does not require a simulation model of the production system.
average active duration, bottleneck detection, data-driven algorithm, maintenance, production system.
[1] Kletti, J., (ed), Manufacturing Execution Systems – MES, Springer: Berlin, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-49744-8
[2] Subramaniyan, M., Production data analytics – to identify productivity potentials. Master Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, 2015.
[3] Donovan, P.O., Lahy, K., Bruton, K. & Sullivan., D.T.J.O., Big data in manufacturing: a systematic mapping study. Journal of Big Data, 2(1), pp. 2–20, 2015.
[4] Gopalakrishnan, M., Skoogh, A. & Laroque, C., Simulation-based planning of maintenance activities by a shifting priority method. Proceedings of 2014 Winter Simulation Conference, eds A. Tolk, S.Y. Diallo, I.O. Ryzhov, L. Yilmaz, S. Buckley & J.A. Miller, pp. 2168–2179, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/wsc.2014.7020061
[5] Goldratt, E.M. & Cox, J., The Goal: A Process on Ongoing Improvement. North River Press, 1992.
[6] Fowler, J.W. & Rose, O., Grand challenges in modeling and simulation of complex manufacturing systems. Simulation, 2(9), pp. 469–476, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0037549704044324
[7] Li, L. & Ni, J., Short-term decision support for maintenance task prioritisation. International Journal of Production Economics, 121(1), pp. 195–202, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.05.006
[8] Roser, C., Nakano, M. & Tanaka, M., A practical bottleneck detection method. Proceedings of 2001 Winter Simulation Conference, eds B.A. Peters, J.S. Smith, D.J. Medeiros & M.W.
Rohrer, pp. 949–953, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2001.977398
[9] Kuo, C.-T., Lim, J.-T. & Meerkov, S.M. Bottlenecks in serial production lines: a system- theoretic a pproach. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2, pp. 233–276, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1024123X96000348
[10] Chiang, S.-Y., Kuo, C.-T. & Meerkov, S., Bottlenecks in markovian production lines: a systems approach. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 14(2), pp. 352–359, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/70.681256
[11] Chiang, S.Y., Kuo, C.-T. & Meerkov, S., DT- bottlenecks in serial production lines: theory and application. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 16(5), pp. 567–580, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/70.880806
[12] Chiang, S.Y., Kuo, C.-T. & Meerkov, S., c-Bottlenecks in serial production lines: identification and application. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 7, pp. 543–578, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1024123X01001776
[13] Law, A.M. & Kelton, D.W., Simulation Modeling and Analysis, 3rd edn., McGraw Hill: New York, 1991.
[14] Lawrence, S.R. & Buss, A.H., Shifting bottlenecks: causes, cures and conundrums. Production and Operations Management, 3(1), pp. 21–37, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.1994.tb00107.x
[15] Law, A.M. & Kelton, D.W., Simulation Modeling and Analysis, 3rd edn., McGraw Hill: New York, 2000.
[16] Roser, C., Nakano, M. & Tanaka, M., Shifting bottleneck detection. Proceedings of 2002 Winter Simulation Conference, eds E. Yucesan, C.H. Chen, J.L. Snowdon & J.M. Charnes, pp. 1079–1086, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/wsc.2002.1166360
[17] Roser, C., Nakano, M. & Tanaka, M., Comparison of bottleneck detection methods for AGV systems. Proceedings of 2003 Winter Simulation Conference, eds S. Chick, P.J. Sanchez, D. Ferrin & D.J. Morrice, pp. 1192–1198, 2003.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2003.1261549
[18] Chang, Q., Ni, J., Bandyopadhyay, P., Biller, S. & Xiao, G., Supervisory factory control based real-time production feedback. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 129(3), pp. 653–630, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.2673666
[19] Betterton, C.E. & Silver, S.J., Detecting the bottlenecks in serial production lines – a focus on interdeparture time variance. International Journal of Production Research, 50(15), pp. 4158–4174, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.596847
[20] Li, L., Chang, Q., Ni, J. & Biller, S., Data driven bottleneck detection of manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Research, 47(18), pp. 5019–5036, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207540701881860
[21] Yin, R.K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage Publications Inc: Thousand Oaks, CA, 2003.
[22] Chapman, P., Clinton, J., Kerber, R., Khabaza, T., Reinartz, T., Shearer, C. & Wirth, R., CRISPDM 1.0 Step-by-Step Data Mining Guide, SPSS, available at https://www.the-modeling-agency.com/crisp-dm.pdf, 2015.