OPEN ACCESS
Public officials charged with managing the risk of wildland fire are looking for ways to apply risk analysis at large scales affecting a wide range of resources, including life and property. The ability to address risk analysis at a large scale is just now emerging with new technologies and analytics in such applications as STARFire. This paper summarizes how the STARFire planning and budgeting system were applied across the state of Idaho, and how it can be used to support state-wide planning using the Idaho State Fire Management Plan initiative as an example. The STARFire planning and budgeting system generated a large-scale risk analysis across the entire state of Idaho for the United States Department of Interior’s Bureau of Land Management (BLM). The STARFire analysis is driven by a single performance metric ‘return on investment’ to make efficient use of scarce funding. We collabo- rated with officials at the BLM to identify and assemble key spatial input data such as: a full range of values at risk, fire behaviour and fire history, and fire management cost information. This and related information was analysed using the STARFire spatial planning and budgeting system to produce a state-wide risk analysis, an integrated fuels and initial attack analysis and an integrated budget analysis across programs. The analysis demonstrated the ability to assess BLM lands across the state and scale between the state and the associated planning units within the state. This is the first time that such an analysis has been performed at such a large scale (across multiple landscapes) at the program level. The associated planning unit level analysis was validated with BLM officials. Products support the BLM’s first state-wide spatial fire management planning initiative.
economics, fire management plan, fuel treatment, Idaho, landscape analysis, risk, spatial planning, STARFire, U.S. Bureau of Land Management, wildland fire
[1] Meyer, M.D., Roberts, S.L., Wills, R., Brooks, M. & Winford, E.M., Principles of effective USA federal fire management plans. Fire Ecology, 11(2), pp. 59–83, 2015.
[2] USDOI, United States Department of Interior. OWF Policy Memorandum 2014-005. Online, available at https://elips.doi.gov/ELIPS/0/doc/4084/Electronic.aspx (accessed 6 June 2018).
[3] US Department of the Interior and US Department of Agriculture (USDOI and USDA). The national strategy: Final phase in the development of the National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy. 93 pages. Online, available at https://www.Forests andrangelands.gov/strategy/documents/strategy/CSPhaseIIINationalStrategyApr2014. pdf, 2014 (accessed 6 June 2018).
[4] USDOI. Instruction Memorandum No. FA IM-2015-028. Online, available at https://www.frames .gov/files/1414/3500/1068/FA_ IM 2015028.pdf (accessed 21 June 2018).
[5] USDOI Office of Policy Analysis. Wildland Fire Management Program benefit-cost analysis: A review of relevant literature. US Department of the Interior, Office of Policy Analysis, Washington, DC., USA. Online, available at https://www.doi.gov/ sites/doi.gov/files/migrated/ppa/upload/Wildland_fire_literature_review_060812FINAL.pdf, 2012 (accessed 21 June 2018).
[6] Rideout, D.B., Wei, Y., Kirsch, A. & Kernohan, N., STARFire: Strategic budgeting and planning for wildland fire management. Park Science, 32(3), pp. 34–41, 2017.
[7] DOI Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Online, available at www.blm.gov/programs/public-safety-and-fire/fire-and-aviation/regional-info/idaho (accessed 5 February2018).
[8] Rideout, D.B. & Wei, Y., A probabilistic landscape analysis supporting the management of unplanned ignitions at sequoia and king canyon national parks. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 32(5), pp. 437–455, 2013.
[9] Rideout, D.B. & Kernohan, N., The relative value of fire planning alternatives. Modelling, Monitoring and Management of Forest Fires III, eds. C.A. Brebbia and G. Perona, WIT Press: Boston, MA, 2013.
[10] Wei, Y., Rideout, D.B., Kirsch, A.G. & Kernohan, N., Science-based budgeting for National Fire Programs. WIT Transcactions on Ecology and the Environment, 10, pp. 107–113, 2017.
[11] FLAMMAP. Online, available at https://www.firelab.org/flammap (accessed January 2016).
[12] Bradshaw L. & McCormick E., FireFamily Plus user’s guide, Version2.0 Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-67WWW. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 2000.
[13] LANDFIRE. Online, available at www.landfire.gov (accessed December 2015).
[14] Short, K.C., Online, available at https://www.fs.fed.us/rmrs/science-spotlights/spatialwildfire-occurrence-data-united-states-1992-2013, 2014 (accessed 22 January 2016).
[15] Rideout, D.B., Ziesler, P.S., Kling, R., Loomis, J.B. & Botti, S.J., Estimating rates of substitution for protecting values at risk for initial attack planning and budgeting. Forest Policy and Economics, 10(4), pp. 205–219, 2008.
[16] USDOI Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Idaho State Office (IDSO) State Fire Management Plan (SFMP). Pending publication, 2018.
[17] ESRI. Online, available at https://storymaps.arcgis.com/en/ (accessed 21 June, 2018).