OPEN ACCESS
The Chinese government is heavily investing in trade-related infrastructure with its one Belt one road initiative (OBOR), A proposal to build a new silk road or network of trade routes. This infrastructure-driven innovation will have a large economic, spatial and environmental impact on China; it is also likely to transform entire regions throughout asia, africa and Europe. in pursuing it, the Chinese government seeks to meaningfully combine a strong national interest in infrastructural and economic development with an equally strong national interest in environmental sustainability. This chapter explores how it might meet both goals. How do the initiative’s many projects intersect with local interests and needs in China? Will these investments carry out the proclaimed desire of the Chinese government for environmentally sustainable development? This chapter examines these questions by looking at how various governmental players are translating these investments and proposals into spatial plans. It focuses on port city regions, using the Dalian region in northeast China, one of the OBOR initiative hubs, as an example. Port regions are key spatial components in the OBOR initiative: as infrastructural hubs and as centres for trade and innovation, as sites of national oil storage or as hubs for the development of new maritime technology. as places where the industrial production and long-distance infrastructure of OBOR encounters densely populated areas, they are also particularly at risk from climate change, including rising sea levels. Thus, the OBOR initiative’s goals of economic improvement and environmental sustainability may well collide.
economic, environment, Dalian, one belt and one road, planning, port cluster, responsible
[1] Huang, Y. & Perlez, J., Behind China’s $1 Trillion Plan to Shake up the Economic Order, The New York Times, 13 May 2017.
[2] Hein, C., Port cities and urban waterfronts: How localized planning ignores water as a connector. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 3(3), pp. 419–38, 2016.
[3] Hein, C., Oil spaces: The global petroleumscape in the Rotterdam/The Hague area. Journal of Urban History, 44(5), pp. 887–929, 2018.
[4] Mullany, G., Huge Oil Spill Spreads in East China Sea, Stirring Environmental Fears. The New York Times, 15 January 2018.
[5] Xinhua Net, China Reveals Risk Map of Marine Disasters, available at http://www. xinhuanet.com/english/2018-05/12/c_137174555.htm.
[6] Sternberg, T., Ahearn. A. & McConnell. F., Central Asian ‘Characteristics’ on China’s New Silk Road: The role of landscape and the politics of infrastructure. Land, 6(3), pp. 55–73, 2017.
[7] Tracy, E. F., Shvarts, E., Simonov, E. & Babenko, M., China’s new Eurasian ambitions: The environmental risks of the Silk Road Economic Belt. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 58(1), pp. 56–88, 2017.
[8] Fardella, E. & Prodi, G., The Belt and Road Initiative Impact on Europe: An Italian perspective. China & World Economy, 25(5), pp. 125–138, 2017. Doi: 10.1111/cwe.12217.
[9] Shariatinia, M. & Azizi, H., Iran–China cooperation in the Silk Road Economic Belt: From strategic understanding to operational understanding. China and World Economy, 25(5), pp. 46–61, 2017. Doi: 10.1111/Cwe.12213.
[10] Schinas, O. & Westarp, A.G., Assessing the impact of the maritime Silk Road. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science, 2(3), pp. 186–19, 2017. Doi: 10.1016/j.joes.207.08.002.
[11] Chhetri, P., Nkhoma, M., Peszynski, K., Chhetri, A. & Lee, P. T.-W., Global logistics city concept: A cluster-led strategy under the Belt and Road Initiative. Maritime Policy & Management, 45(3), pp. 319-335, 2017. Doi: 10.1080/03088839.2017.1400700.
[12] Lee, P. T.-W., Hu, Z.-H., Lee, S.-J., Choi, K.-S. and Shin, S.-H., Research trends and agenda on the Belt and Road (B&R) Initiative with a focus on maritime transport. Maritime Policy & Management, 45(3), pp. 282–300, 2018. Doi: 10.1080/03088839.2017.1400189.
[13] de Langen, P. W. & Visser, E.-J., Collective action regimes in seaport clusters: The case of the Lower Mississippi port cluster. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(2), pp. 173–186, 2005. Doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.04.010.
[14] Monios, J. & Wang, Y., Spatial and institutional characteristics of inland port development in China. Geo Journal, 78(5), pp. 897–913, 2013. Doi: 10.1007/s10708-013-9473-2.
[15] Wu, F. & Phelps, N. A., From Suburbia to Post-Suburbia in China? Aspects of the transformation of the Beijing and Shanghai global city regions. Built Environment, 34(4), pp. 464–481, 2008. Doi: 10.2148/benv.34.4.464.
[16] Lin, Y., Urban regeneration in China: Policy, development, and issues. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 26(5), pp. 337–347, 2011. Doi: 10.1177/0269094211409117
[17] Zhang, L. & Zhao, S.X., City Branding and the Olympic effect: A case study of Beijing. Cities, 26(5), pp. 245–254, 2009. Doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2009.05.002.
[18] Ye, L. & Björner, E., Linking city branding to multi-level urban governance in Chinese mega-Cities: A case study of Guangzhou. Cities, 80, pp. 29–37. Doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.018.
[19] Bie, J., de Jong, M. & Derudder, B., Greater Pearl River Delta: Historical evolution towards a global city-region. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(2), pp. 103–123, 2015. Doi: 10.1080/10630732.2014.971575.
[20] Xiong, L., Yu, C., de Jong, W. M., Wang, F. & Cheng, B., Economic transformation in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region: Is it undergoing the environmental Kuznets curve?Sustainability, 9(5), pp. 869–869, 2017. Doi: 10.3390/su9050869.
[21] de Jong, M., Chen, Y., Joss, S., Lu, H., Zhao, M., Yang, Q. & Zhang, C., Explaining city branding practices in China’s three mega-city regions: The role of ecological modernization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 179, pp. 527–543, 2018 Doi: 10.1016/j. jclepro.2018.01.098.
[22] Han, M., de Jong, M., Cui, Z., Xu, L., Lu, H. & Sun, B., City Branding in China’s northeastern region: How do cities reposition themselves when facing industrial decline and ecological modernization? Sustainability, 10(2), pp. 102–102, 2018. Doi: 10.3390/su10010102.
[23] Ravesteijn, W., He, J. & Chen, C., Responsible innovation and stakeholder management in infrastructures: The Nansha Port Railway Project. Ocean & Coastal Management, 100, pp. 1–9, 2014. Doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.07.005
[24] Ravesteijn, W., Liu, Y. & Yan, P., Responsible innovation in port development: The Rotterdam Maasvlakte 2 and the Dalian Dayao Bay Extension Projects. Water science and Technology : A Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 72(5), pp. 665–77, 2015. Doi: 10.2166/wst.2015.272.
[25] Source: National Development and Reform Commission] . available at http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/zcfb/zcfbghwb/201612/W020161219594214175674.pdf.
[26] Xie, L., Yang, Z., Cai, J., Cheng, Z., Wen, T. & Song, T., Harbin: A Rust belt city revival from its strategic position, Cities, 58, pp. 26–38, 2016. Doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.009.
[27] Pardali, A., Kounoupas, E. & Lainos, I., Can clusters be bi-polar? Exploring the case of the Piraeus Port-Maritime cluster. Maritime Policy & Management, 43(6), pp. 706–719, 2016. Doi: 10.1080/03088839.2016.1169447.
[28] Sina Comprehensive; Petrochina (Dalian) Petrochemical Has Frequent Fires: It Is the Seventh Accident since 2010, 中石油大连石化火灾频发：2010年至今已是第七次事故；http://finance.sina.com.cn/chanjing/gsnews/2017-08-18/doc-ifykcypp8898450. shtml. (accessed 18 August 2017).
[29] Diao, F., Taipingwan Port (Dalian) Has Been Fined 10 Million for Illegal Reclamation, and Local Subsidies Are All Paid Back, 太平湾港区违法填海被罚千万 当地又以补贴全返, http://m.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_1747484. (accessed 31 July 2017).