Accessibility Index Analysis of Medan Subdistrict Region: A Dual Approach

Accessibility Index Analysis of Medan Subdistrict Region: A Dual Approach

Ridwan Anas Medis S. Surbakti Ika Puji Hastuty

Department of Civil Engineering, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

Available online: 
| Citation

© 2021 IIETA. This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license (



Accessibility is a concept that combines land use with transport service networks that connect and facilitates movements between locations or regions. cities are built based on transportation planning and should provide adequate access to the activities of the region. this paper measured the accessibility index of the sub-district region in Medan by applying two approaches. Attention is given to highlight the differences in transport accessibility measurement results. the results determine the disparities of transport services in each of the sub-district. identifying the accessibility index can be used to evaluate the policies encouraging public transport use in Medan. the  public transport system should be developed based on high-density corridors and corridors poorly served by existing public transport to suppress private vehicles’ increase in urban areas. improvement of public transport services is manda- tory to fulfill the accessibility of the region and minimize the tendency for road-oriented development (traditional approach) only. the public transport routes and total fleet operations seem to be a crucial issue to encourage private vehicle owners to use public transport by increasing the accessibility index of the region.


accessibility, accessibility index, public transport services, road network, land use and transport


[1] Štefančić, G., Šarić, Slavko. & Spudić, R., Correlation between land use and urban public transport: a case study of Zagreb. Promet - Traffic & Transportation, 26, pp. 179-184, 2014.

[2] Trattner Z., Chronis, A., & Muñoz, A., The Mobility Topography Model for Substantializing and Projecting Transportation in Cities. Proceeding of Architecture and Urban Design conferences, pp. 209-307, 2017.

[3] Wee, Bert van, Land use and transport: research and policy challenges. Journal of Transport Geography, 10, pp. 259–271, 2002.

[4] Bok, J., & Kwon, Y., Comparable measures of accessibility to public transport using the general transit feed specification. Journal of Sustainability, 8, p 224, 2016.

[5] Cosra P. B., Morais, N.G.C., & Bertolde, A.I., Urban mobility indexes: a brief review of the literature. Proceeding of World Conference on Transport Research, pp. 3649–3659, 2017.

[6] Jiang, H., Xu, W., & Zhang, W., Transportation accessibility and location choice of Japanese-Funded electronic information manufacturing firms in Shanghai. Journal of Sustainability, 10, p 390, 2018.

[7] Kota Medan dalam Angka, BPS-Statistics of Medan Municipality, pp. 57-72, 2019.

[8] Susilo, O.Y., Joewono, T.B., Santosa, W., & Parikesit, D., A reflection of motorization and public transport in the Jakarta metropolitan area. IATSS Research. 31(1), pp. 59-67, 2007.

[9] Satiennam, T., Jaensirisak, S., Satiennam, W., & Detdamrong, S., Potential for modal shift by passenger car and motorcycle users towards Bus Rapid Transit (BRT ) in an Asian developing city. IATSS Research, 39, pp. 121-129, 2015.

[10] Idris, Z,.RW ., Sri Prabandiyani, & Riyanto, B., Implementation of management policy in urban public transportation based on user satisfaction in Yogyakarta agglomeration. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), 10 (2), pp. 743-750, 2019.

[11] Vulevic, A., Accessibility concepts and indicators in transportation strategic planning issues: theoretical framework and literature review. Logistics & Sustainable Transport, 7 (1), pp. 58-67, 2016.

[12] Ford, A.C., Barr, S.L., Dawson, R.J., & James, P., Transport accessibility analysis using GIS: assessing sustainable transport in London. International Journal of Geo-Information, 4, pp. 124-149, 2015.

[13] Development of an urban accessibility index: formulations, aggregation, and application Research; Texas Department of Transportation, pp. 5-6, 2002.

[14] Geurs, K.T. & Wee, B.V., Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12, pp. 127–140, 2004.

[15] Knox, P. L., The intraurban ecology of primary medical care: patterns of accessibility and their policy implications. Environment and Planning A, 10, pp. 415 – 435, 1978.

[16] Accessibility in urban areas: an overview of different indicators, National Institute for Transport and Road Research, CSIR, South Africa 1983.

[17] Handy, S.L., & Niemeier, D.A., Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Planning A, 29, pp. 1175–1194, 1997.

[18] Bach, L., The problem of aggregation and distance for analyses of accessibility and access opportunity in Location-Allocation models. Environment and Planning A, 13, pp. 955–978, 1981.

[19] Akiva, B.M., & Lerman, S., Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, The MIT Press: Massachusetts. 1985.

[20] Davidson, K. B., Accessibility in Transport/Land-Use Modelling and Assessment. Environment and Planning A, 9, pp. 1401 – 1416, 1977.

[21] Levinson, D., & Kumar, A., Multimodal trip distribution: structure and application. Transportation Research Record, 1466, pp. 124 – 131, 1994.

[22] Handy, S. L., Regional versus local accessibility: neo-traditional development and its implications for non-work travel. Built Environment, 18(4), pp. 253 – 267, 1993.

[23] Brussel, M., Zuidgeest, M., Pfeffer, K., & Maarseveen, M.V., Access or accessibility? a critique of the urban transport SDG Indicator. Int. J. Geo-Inf., 8, pp. 67, 2019.

[24] Moeckel, R., Garcia, C.L., Chou, A.T.M., & Okrah, M.B., Trends in integrated landuse/transport modeling: An evaluation of the state of the art. The Journal of Transport and Land use, 11(1), pp. 463-476, 2018.

[25] Stanley, J.K., Land use/transport integration: Starting at the right place. Research in Transportation Economics, pp. 1-8, 2014.

[26] Accessibility in cities: transport and urban form; London School of Economics and Political Science, 2014.

[27] Accessibility measures: overview and practical Applications; Department of Urban and Regional Planning Curtin University, Online, Accessed on: 21 August 2019.

[28] Daniels, R. & Mulley, C., Explaining walking distance to public transport: The dominance of public transport supply. The Journal of Transport and Land Use, 6(2), pp. 5-20, 2013

[29] Cooke, S, & Behrens, R., Correlation or cause? The limitations of population density as an indicator for public transport viability in the context of a rapidly growing developing city. Proceeding of World Conference on Transport Research - WCTR, pp. 3003-3016, 2016.

[30] Zhang, D., A coefficient of determination for generalized Linear Models, The American Statistician, pp 6-9, 2016.