A Bottom-Up Cost Model for Electric Railbased Regional Public Transport Services: The Italian Context

A Bottom-Up Cost Model for Electric Railbased Regional Public Transport Services: The Italian Context

Alessandro Avenali Giuseppe Catalano Tiziana D’Alfonso Mirko Giagnorio Martina Gregori Giorgio Matteucci

Department of Computer, Control, and Management Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy

Available online: 
| Citation

© 2021 IIETA. This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).



When comparing the cost structure of different transport operators, tools standardising the expenses an ideal efficient operator would incur in producing a specific transport service are valuable instruments for private companies and public authorities. in this paper, we build a bottom-up cost model for electric-driven rail-based regional transport services. the  proposed model includes (i) transport services production costs; (ii) maintenance costs; (iii) administrative costs and (iv) the cost of capital. except for the expenses for electric traction, infrastructure costs have been excluded and considered, as frequently happens, upon an external infrastructure manager. the bottom-up approach, relying on engineering analysis of the production process, limits the influence of past inefficiencies, typical of methods based on historical data. the model is developed for a generic short-medium distance service; it is then calibrated on the italian context, thanks to disaggregating data on production collected through questionnaires from italian transport operators in 2012 (covering 95% of the national service).

We realised two settings, representing respectively an average performance and an ‘ideal’ best practise. to show the potentiality of the tool for policy makers, we apply the model to four case studies and calculate the maximum economic compensation paid to transport operators for each of them. the cases mainly differ over three fundamental characteristics: number of stops along the route, frequency and commercial speed. the latter two result to be the most influential factors in defining the unit standard cost. finally, we run numerical simulations to measure the marginal impact on efficiency obtained by modifying selected cost-driving variables and highlight the most promising interventions to enhance the performance gains. in particular, we consider both elements under the control of operators (e.g. vehicles and drivers productivity) and elements under the control of public authorities (e.g. average fleet age). 


bottom-up model, cost proxy models, local public transport, rail service, standard costs


[1] Catalano, G., Daraio, C., Diana, M., Gregori, M., & Matteucci, G., Efficiency, effectiveness, and impacts assessment in the rail transport sector: a state-of-theart critical analysis of current research. International Transactions in Operational Research, 26(1), pp. 5–40.

[2] Dalen, D.M. & Lobo, A.G., Yardsticks on the road: regulatory contracts and cost efficiency in the Norwegian bus industry. Transportation, 30(4), pp. 371–386, 2003.

[3] Hensher, D.A., Mulley, C. & Smith, N.A., Towards a simplified performance-linked value for money model as a reference point for bus contract payments. Research in Transportation Economics, 39(1), 232–238, 2013.

[4] Avenali, A., Boitani, A., Catalano, G., D’Alfonso, T. & Matteucci, G., Assessing standard costs in local public bus transport: a hybrid cost model. Transport Policy, 62, pp. 48–57, 2018.

[5] Sansom, T., Nash, C., Mackie, P., Shires, J., & Watkiss, P., Surface transport costs and charges. Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, 2001.

[6] Cambini, C., Filippini, M., Piacenza, M., & Vannoni, D., Corporatization and firm performance: evidence from publicly-provided local utilities. Review of Law & Economics, 7(1), pp. 191–213, 2011.

[7] Avenali, A., Catalano, G., D’Alfonso, T., & Matteucci, G., Standard cost of Italian metro services: the influence of automatism, wheels technology and capacity. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 182, 49–59, 2019.

[8] Avenali, A., Boitani, A., Catalano, G., Matteucci, G., & Monticini, A., Standard costs of regional public rail passenger transport: evidence from Italy. Applied Economics, 52 (15), 1704–1717, 2929.

[9] Avenali, A., Catalano, G., D’Alfonso, T., Giagnorio, M., & Matteucci, G., A proxy cost model for tramway services. International Journal of Transport Development and Integration, 4(4), pp. 353–367, 2020.

[10] Avenali, A., Catalano, G., Gregori, M., & Matteucci, G., Rail versus bus local public transport services: a social cost comparison methodology. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 7, 2020.

[11] Cambini, C., Piacenza, M., & Vannoni, D., Restructuring public transit systems: evidence on cost properties from medium and large-sized companies. Review of Industrial Organization, 31(3), pp. 183–203, 2007.

[12] European Commission. A clean planet for all – a European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, moder, competitive and climate neutral economy, 2018.

[13] Nash, C., Passenger railway reform in the last 20 years – European experience reconsidered. Research in Transportation Economics, 22(1), pp. 61–70, 2008.

[14] ART – Autorità di Regolazione dei Trasporti. Allegato A alla delibera n. 65/2020 del marzo 2020, 2020.

[15] Parbo, J., Nielsen, O. A., & Prato, C.G., Reducing passengers’ travel time by optimizing stopping patterns in a large-scale network: a case-study in the Copenhagen Region. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 113, 197–212, 2018.