A New Methodology for Accidents Analysis: The Case of the State Road 36 in Italy

A New Methodology for Accidents Analysis: The Case of the State Road 36 in Italy

Fabio Borghetti Giovanna Marchionni Matteo De Bianchi Benedetto Barabino Michela Bonera Claudia Caballini

Mobility and Transport Laboratory – Design Department – Politecnico di Milano, Italy

Department of Civil Engineering, Architecture, Land, Environment and Mathematics (DICATAM) – University of Brescia, Italy

Department of Environment, Land and Infrastructure Engineering (DIATI) – Politecnico di Torino, Italy

Page: 
278-290
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/TDI-V5-N3-278-290
Received: 
N/A
|
Revised: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Available online: 
N/A
| Citation

© 2021 IIETA. This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Every year more than 1.35 million people die for road accidents and several million suffer serious injuries, which force them to live with compromised health conditions. Over the last decades, road safety research has focused on improving modelling techniques. However, due to the lack of expertise and statistical skills, such approaches might not be used by local authorities and road managers for road safety evaluation purposes. This paper proposes an operational methodology to analyze road accidents with the aim of increasing road safety. More specifically, the methodology enables to identify the most critical road segments to prioritize economic resources allocation accordingly. by using the data collected by the Road Police Department of Lombardy Region (in Italy) from 2014 to 2018, this methodology has been successfully applied to State Road 36, which is recognized as one of the busiest roads in Italy with a very high number of accidents occurring every year. The proposed methodology may support public administrations and road managers – involved in the definition and implementation of safety measures – to reduce the number of road accidents identifying and implementing prioritized interventions. Moreover, the methodology is general enough to be applied to each segment of a generic road infrastructure.

Keywords: 

decision support system, GIS, road accident analysis, road safety analysis, road safety framework, road transportation infrastructure, statistical data

  References

[1] WHO World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Road Safety 2018: Summary. World Health Organization, 2018.

[2] European Union. EU road safety policy framework 2021–2030. Next steps towards ‘Vision Zero’. Commission Staff Working Document SWD (2019) 283 final, 2020.

[3] Lord, D. & Mannering, F.L., The statistical analysis of accident-frequency data: a review and assessment of methodological alternatives. Transportation research part A: policy and practice, 44(5), pp. 291–305, 2010.

[4] Mannering, F.L. & Bhat, C.R., Analytic methods in road accident research: methodological frontier and future directions.  Analytic Methods in Road Accident Research, 1, pp. 1–22, 2014.

[5] American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). Highway safety manual. Washington, DC, USA, 2010.

[6] Bonera, M. & Maternini, G., Methodology for the application of predictive method for road safety analysis in urban areas. the case study of Brescia. Transportation Research Procedia, 45, pp. 659–667, 2020. 

[7] Farid, A., Abdel-Aty  , M., Lee, J.,  Eluru  & N., Wang, J., 2016. Exploring the transferability of safety performance functions. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 94, pp. 143–152, 2016.

[8] La Torre, F., Domenichini, L.,  Meocci, M., Graham, D.,  Karathodorou, N., Richter, T., Ruhlc S., Yannis G., Dragomantovits A. & Laiou, A., Development of a transnational road accident prediction model. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, pp. 1772–1781, 2016.

[9] Porcu, F., Olivo, A., Maternini, G., & Barabino, B., Evaluating bus accident risks in public transport. Transportation Research Procedia, 45, pp. 443–450, 2020.

[10] Barabino, B., Bonera, M., Maternini, G., Olivo, A., & Porcu, F. (2021). Bus crash risk evaluation: An adjusted framework and its application in a real network. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 159, 106258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106258

[11] Borghetti F., Frassoldati A., Derudi M., Lai I. & Trinchini C., Safety in road tunnels: accident data analysis of the Italian motorway A24 and A25. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 82, pp. 307–312, 2020.

[12] Imprialou, M., & Quddus, M., Accident data quality for road safety research: current state and future directions. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 130, pp. 84–90, 2019.

[13] Schlögl, M. & Stütz, R., Methodological considerations with data uncertainty in road safety analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 130, pp. 136–150, 2019.

[14] European Road Assessment Program, RAP Crash Risk Mapping: Technical Specification, 2020.

[15] Porcu, F., Olivo, A., Maternini, G., Coni, M., Bonera, M. & Barabino, B., Assessing the risk of bus crashes in transit system. European Transport-Trasporti Europei, 81(4), 2021.

[16] ACI Automobile Club d’Italia, The road road accident map, Online: available at http://www.aci.it/Archive-News/News.html? Tx_ttnews%5Btt_news% 5D=2391 & cHash=a cea10e79cbd173913061eebf0a37b0e (accessed April 2021).

[17] Directorate General for Road Safety – Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport. Studies for the evaluation of the social costs of road accidents, 2017.

[18] Lane, R., Cleaning open graded asphalt to improve safety.  Proceedings of the International Surface Friction Conference, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2005.

[19] Ahmed, F., 2015. Porous asphalt clogging performance under Swedish conditions, Master’s thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Civil and Architectural Engineering.