Understanding Multimodal Accessibility Parameters in Diverse Urban Environments: A Pilot Study in Darmstadt

Understanding Multimodal Accessibility Parameters in Diverse Urban Environments: A Pilot Study in Darmstadt

Lakshya Pandit Martin Knöll

Urban Health Games, FB15, TU Darmstadt, Germany

Available online: 
| Citation



The research takes into consideration diverse perspectives and parameters for assessing accessibility in urban spaces within the Frankfurt Rhein-Main Area, with the initiation of pilot study in Darmstadt, being one of the major cities forming the urban agglomeration. Diverse tools including public transport accessibility level and Space Syntax which contribute to the factor of accessibility are studied and utilized in different urban spaces and further correlated. The study takes into consideration the city centre, the main transit station and a residential area, as three urban spaces within Darmstadt, to understand how the selected performance measures quantify leading to qualitative learning and inferences. The study aims to further evolve in future stages, in order to understand the diversity through the accessibility performance measures through different cities, based on commuter flows, within the urban agglomeration. Assessing accessible mobility in continuum within the urban agglomeration, through interdisciplinary means of research methodology, would assist in the vision (as per German legislation) of obtaining an accessible and integrated multimodal transport system by 2022.


accessibility, agglomeration, mobility


[1] D isability Inclusive and Accessible Urban Development Network (DIAUD), The Inclusion Imperative: Towards Disability-inclusive and Accessible Urban Development, available at https://www.cbm.org/Publications-252011.php, 2016.

[2] Hessian Ministry of Economic Affairs, Energy, Traffic and State Development, Hessen - Strategie Mobilität 2035, available at https://www.mobileshessen2020.de/strategie2035, Wiesbaden, 2018.

[3] S chafer, P. & Gilbert, A., All Roads Lead through Frankfurt, What to do – the Traffic Planning Perspective. Living the Region – Rhein-Main, The Redesign of a Metropolitan Region, Germany, pp. 100–105, 2018.

[4] E ngwicht, D., Reclaiming our cities and Towns: Better Living with Less Traffic, New Society Publishers: Philadelphia, pp. 167–168, 1993.

[5] L itman, T., Evaluating Accessibility for Transportation Planning: Measuring People’sAbility to Reach desired Goods and Activities, Victoria Transport Policy Institute: Canada, pp. 3–9, 2016.

[6] B ertolini, L., Spatial development patterns and public transport: the application of an analytical model in the Netherlands. Planning Practice and Research, 14(2), pp. 199–210, 1999.

[7] C ristopher, G. & Geoff, S., Advancements in Public Transport Accessibility Assessments for Development Control -A proposed Methodology, Capita Symonds Ltd Transport Consultancy, pp. 2–8, 2008.

[8] Hillier, B., Space is the Machine: A configurational Theory of Architecture, London, pp. 93–103, 1996.

[9] Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T. & Xu, J., Natural movement: or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20, pp. 29–66, 1993.

[10] Knöll, M., Neuheuser, K., Cleff, T. & Rudolph-Cleff, A., A tool to predict perceived urban stress in open public spaces. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 45(4), pp. 797–813, 2017.

[11] Ewing, R., Best Development Practices: Doing the Right Thing and Making Money at the Same Time, American Planning Association: Chicago, pp. 12–22, 1996.

[12] DepthmapX development team, depthmapX (Version 0.6.0) [Computer software], available at https://github.com/SpaceGroupUCL/depthmapX, 2017.

[13] Burton, E. & Mitchell, L., Inclusive Urban Design - Streets for Life, Architectural Press, Oxford, 2016.

[14] Murphy, R., The Central Business District: A study in urban geography, New York, pp 3–11, 2017.