Measuring Rapid Transit Accessibility and Equity in Migrant Communities Across 17 European Cities

Measuring Rapid Transit Accessibility and Equity in Migrant Communities Across 17 European Cities

Alexandros Bartzokas-Tsiompras Yorgos N. Photis

Laboratory of Geography & Spatial Analysis, National Technical University of Athens, Greece

Available online: 
| Citation



Migrants in cities are highly dependent on frequent and fast public transport services. Easy access to rapid transit stations, such as subways or suburban rails, plays a crucial role in shaping migrants’ daily lives and critically influences integration processes at the local level. Nevertheless, in Europe, little is known about migrants’ access to rapid transport facilities. This article is the first one that provides com- parable local indicators of rapid transit accessibility and equity in the supply of transit services for vari- ous migrant and non-migrant groups across 17 European cities. Our analysis was based primarily on an innovative European spatial dataset about migrants’ concentration in cities as well as on several openly available general transit feed specification datasets. Methodologically, we used a classic gravity-based accessibility model, where the average frequency of daily departures was assumed as the attractiveness factor of the instrument. On the other hand, we performed Gini coefficient analysis and created Lorenz curve graphs to assess transit equity. The results allowed us to make interor intracity comparisons and to demonstrate some of the most transit disadvantaged migrant communities in Europe. Our findings suggest that Africans experience on average the worst access, while Americans, in the vast majority of cities, are located in high-access districts. Also, transit equity assessment demonstrated a high level of inequality across all population groups and cities, except Barcelona. A striking result was that 88% of African communities in Turin shared only 10% of rapid transit supply. However, it was confirmed that regardless of people’s nationality, in many cities around Europe, it is difficult for many dwellers to live in close proximity to subways. Therefore, better land-use and mobility policies are required to guide cities towards more inclusive and sustainable urban development.


European cities, gravity index, migrants, rapid transit, transit accessibility, transit equity


[1] Welsch, J., Conrad, K. & Wittowsky, D., Exploring immigrants travel behaviour: empirical findings from Offenbach am Main, Germany. Transportation, 45, pp. 733–750, 2018.

[2] OECD, Working Together for Local Integration of Migrants and Refugees, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2018. [Online]. Available:

[3] Blumenberg, E. & Evans, A. E., Planning for demographic diversity: the case of immigrants and public transit. Journal of Public Transportation, 13(2), pp. 23–45, 2010.

[4] Blumenberg, E., Moving in and moving around: Immigrants, travel behavior, and implications for transport policy. Transportation Letters, 1(2), pp. 169–180, 2009.

[5] Marks, M., Mason, J. & Oliveira, G., People Near Transit: Improving Accessibility and Rapid Transit Coverage in Large Cities, Insitute for Transportation & Development Policy, 2016. [Online]. Available:

[6] Zhao, F., Chow, L. F., Li, M. T., Ubaka, I. & Gan, A., Forecasting transit walk accessibility: regression model alternative to buffer method. Transportation Research Record, 1835, pp. 34–41, 2003.

[7] Saif, M. A., Zefreh, M. M. & Torok, A., Public transport accessibility: A literature review. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, 47(1), pp. 36–43, 2019.

[8] Adli, S. N., Chowdhury, S. & Shiftan, Y., Justice in public transport systems: A comparative study of Auckland, Brisbane, Perth and Vancouver. Cities, 90, pp. 88–99, 2019.

[9] El-Geneidy, A., Buliung, R., Diab, E., van Lierop, D., Langlois, M. & Legrain, A., Non-stop equity: Assessing daily intersections between transit accessibility and social disparity across the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA). Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 43(3), pp. 540–560, 2015.

[10] Currie, G., Quantifying spatial gaps in public transport supply based on social needs. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(1), pp. 31–41, 2010.

[11] Batty, M., Accessibility: in search of a unified theory. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36, pp. 191–194, 2009.

[12] Hansen, W., How Accessibility Shapes Land Use. Journal of the American Planning, 25(2), pp. 73–76, 1959.

[13] Geurs, K. & van Wee, B., Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12(2), pp. 127–140, 2004.

[14] Mavoa, S., Witten, K., McCreanor, T. & O’Sullivan, D., GIS based destination accessibility via public transit and walking in Auckland, New Zealand. Journal of Transport Geography, 20, pp. 15–22, 2012.

[15] Poelman, H. & Dijkstra, L., Measuring access to public transport in European cities, European Commission, DG REGIO Working Papers. [Online]. Available:

[16] Nassir, N., Hickman, M., Malekzadeh, A. & Irannezhad, E., A utility-based travel impedance measure for public transit network accessibility. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 88, pp. 26–39, 2016.

[17] Geertman, S. C., van Eck, R. & Jan, R., GIS and models of accessibility potential: an application in planning. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 9(1), pp. 67–80, 1995.

[18] Piovani, D., Arcaute, E., Uchoa, G., Wilson, A. & Batty, M., Measuring accessibility using gravity and radiation models.  R. Soc. Open Sci, 5(171668), 2018.

[19] Geurs, K. & van Eck, R., Accessibility Measures: Review and Applications – Evaluation of accessibility impacts of land-use transport scenarios, and related social and economic impacts, RIVM, report 408505 006, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment. 2001. [Online]. Available:

[20] Coppola, P., Papa, E. & Angiello, G., Gravity-Based Accessibility Measures (GRA-baM) for sustainable development of Rome urban area. in COST Action TU1002 – Assessing usability of accessibility instruments, Brussels, 2014, pp. 65–72.

[21] Hasnine, S. M., Graovac, A., Camargo, F. & Habib, K. N., A random utility maximization (RUM) based measure of accessibility to transit: Accurate capturing of the first-mile issue in urban transit. Journal of Transport Geography, 74, pp. 313–320, 2019.

[22] Delbosc, A. & Currie, G., Using Lorenz curves to assess public transport equity. Journal of Transport Geography, 19, pp. 1252–1259, 2011.

[23] Lucas, K.,  van Wee, B. & Maat, K., A method to evaluate equitable accessibility: combining ethical theories and accessibility-based approaches. Transportation, 43, pp. 473–490, 2016.

[24] Ramjerdi, F., Equity measures and their performance in transportation,” Transportation Research Record, 1983(1), pp. 67–74, 2006.

[25] Ricciardi, A. M., Xia, J. & Currie, G., Exploring public transport equity between separate disadvantaged cohorts: a case study in Perth, Australia. Journal of Transport Geography, 43, pp. 111–122, 2015.

[26] Kaplan, S., Popoks, D., Prato, C. G. & Ceder, A., Using connectivity for measuring equity in transit provision. Journal of Transport Geography, 37, pp. 82–92, 2014.

[27] Ding, J., Zhang, Y. & Li, L., Accessibility Measure of Bus Transit Networks. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 12(7), pp. 682–688, 2018.

[28] Welch, T. F. & Mishra, S., A measure of equity for public transit connectivity. Journal of Transport Geography, 33, pp. 29–41, 2013.

[29] Haustein, S., Kroesen, M. & Mulalic, I., Cycling culture and socialization: modeling the effect of immigrant origin on cycling in Denmark and the Netherlands. Transportation, p. Article in Press, 2019.

[30] Flavia, T. & Rohr, C., The impact of migration on transport and congestion, RAND Corporation. 2011. [Online]. Available:

[31] EUROSTAT, High-Density Clusters. 2017. [Online]. Available:

[32] Tintori, G., Alessandrini, A. & F. Natale, Diversity, residential segregation, concentration of migrants: a comparison across EU cities, JRC Technical Reports, European Commission. 2018. [Online]. Available: doi:10.2760/823648.

[33] Sevtsuk, A. & Mekonnen, M., Urban network analysis: A new toolbox for measuring city form in ArcGIS. in Symposium on Simulation for Architecture and Urban Design, Orlando, FL, 2012.

[34] Rokem, J. & Vaughan, L., Geographies of ethnic segregation in Stockholm: The role of mobility and co-presence in shaping the ‘diverse’ city. Urban Studies, p. Article in Press, 2018.