I. Henke
OPEN ACCESS
The choice of university studies is one of the main socio-economic categories that is affected by the quality of public transport services and in particular rail transport. This category is characterized to cover medium to long distances to reach, every day, the place of study. for this reason, among the urban sustainable policies, the mobility choices of the university students have long been analysed in literature. The aim of this paper was to estimate the effect of railway accessibility on the choice of university studies.
The university of Naples federico II (Italy) is taken as the case study. In the spring of 2014, using the database obtained from the registry office of the university the following were investigated:
– the origin of the daily trips (residential address);
– the trip frequency and the departure/arriving time;
– the modes or sequence of modes used;
– the perceived public transport quality (e.g. travel time, comfort).
To evaluate the catchment area of the university and for analysing what attributes influence the choice of university studies (in particular the ‘weight’ of a specific railway accessibility), a regression model was used. among the model attributes educational course variables, home–university distance and a constant-specific attribute were also considered.
The result of the study shows the surprising role of railway accessibility in the choice of university studies; to travel from a station within 900 m from home is equivalent (in terms of perceived utility) to travel every day a distance greater than 28 km to reach the university.
geographical distribution of students' residences, logistic function, railways stations, transport accessibility
[1] C ascetta, E., Cartenì, A., Pagliara F. & Montanino, M., A new look at planning and designingtransportation systems: a decision-making model based on cognitive rationality,stakeholder engagement and quantitative methods. Transport Policy, 38, pp. 27–39,2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.11.005.
[2] C artenì, A., Urban sustainable mobility. Part 1: Rationality in transport planning. TransportProblems, 9(4), pp. 39–48, 2014.
[3] de Luca, S., Public engagement in strategic transportation planning: An analytic hierarchyprocess based approach. Transport Policy, 33, pp. 110–124, 2014.DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.03.002.
[4] H ansen, W.G., How accessibility shapes land-use. Journal of the American Institute ofPlanners, 25, pp. 73–76, 1959. DOI: 10.1080/01944365908978307.
[5] L eonardi, G., Optimum facility location by accessibility maximizing. Environment andPlanning A, 10, pp. 1287–305, 1978. DOI: 10.1068/a101287.
[6] C artenì, A., Accessibility indicators for freight transport terminals. Arabian Journal forScience and Engineering, 39, pp. 7647–7660, 2014.DOI: 10.1007/s13369-014-1333-y.
[7] C artenì, A., Galante G. & Henke I., The catchment area of high architectural railwaystations: An application of the Graham scan algorithm. WIT Transactions on the BuiltEnvironment, 135, pp. 463–474, 2014. DOI: 10.2495/CR140381.
[8] C ascetta, E., Cartenì, A. & Montanino, M., A behavioral model of accessibility based onthe number of available opportunities. Journal of Transport Geography, 51, pp. 45–58,2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.11.002.
[9] Politecnico di Milano, Mobility Management per il sistema universitario milanese,2007. http://progetti.unicatt.it/. Accessed September 2014.
[10] U niversità degli Studi di Pavia, Gli spostamenti casa-università degli studentidell'Università degli Studi di Pavia, 2014. http://www-wp.unipv.it/. Accessed May2015.
[11] H orstschraer, J., University rankings in action? The importance of rankings and an excellencecompetition for university choice of high-ability students. Economics of EducationReview, 31, pp. 1162–1176, 2012.
[12] Gürsesa, A., Büsra, K., Mindivana, F., Dogarb, Ç., Günes, K. & Yolcua H.H., Determiningthe relationship between students' choice of profession and mission and vision oftheir high school. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, pp. 2595–2598, 2011.DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.149.
[13] C ascetta, E. & Cartenì, A., The hedonic value of railways terminals. A quantitative analysisof the impact of stations quality on travellers behaviour. Transportation ResearchPart A, 61, pp. 41–52, 2014.
[14] C ascetta, E. & Cartenì, A., A quality-based approach to public transportation planning:theory and a case study. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 8(1),pp. 84–106, 2014.
[15] C ascetta E., Cartenì, A. & Henke I., Stations quality, aesthetics and attractiveness of railtransport: empirical evidence and mathematical models [Qualità delle stazioni, esteticae attrattività del trasporto ferroviario: evidenze empiriche e modelli matematici],IngegneriaFerroviaria, 69(4), pp. 307–324, 2014.
[16] C artenì, A., Galante G. & Henke I., An assessment of models accuracy in predictingrailways traffic flows: a before and after study in Naples. WIT Transactions on Ecologyand the Environment, 191, pp. 783–794, 2014. DOI: 10.2495/SC140661.
[17] VI Rapporto dell'European Migration Network (Emn) Italia, Gli studenti internazionalinelle università italiane: indagine empirica e approfondimenti, http://www.yallaitalia.it, 2013. Accessed September 2014.
[18] H osmer, D.W., Taber, S. & Lemeshow, S., The importance of assessing the fit of logisticregressionmodels: a case study. American Journal of Public Health, 81(12), pp. 1630–1635,December 1991. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.81.12.1630.
[19] H ilbe, J.M., Logistic regression models, CRC Press, 2009.
[20] B attaglia, F., Metodi di previsione statistica, Collana di Statistica e Probabilità Applicata,Springer Science & Business Media, 2010.
[21] de Luca, S. & Cartenì, A., A multi-scale modelling architecture for estimating oftransportmode choice induced by a new railway connection: The Salerno-Universityof Salerno-Mercato San Severino Route [Un'architettura modellistica multi-scala perla stima delle ripartizioni modali indotte da un nuovo collegamento ferroviario: il casostudio della tratta Salerno-Università di Salerno-Mercato San Severino]. IngegneriaFerroviaria, 68 (5), pp. 447–473, 2013.
[22] C artenì, A., Updating demand vectors using traffic counts on congested networks:A real case application. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 96, pp. 211–221,2007. DOI: 10.2495/UT070211.
[23] C artenì, A. & Punzo, V., Travel time cost functions for urban roads: A case study in Italy.WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 96, pp. 233–243, 2007. DOI: 10.2495/UT070231.
[24] de Luca, S. & Cantarella, G.E., Validation and comparison of choice models. TravelDemandManagement and Road User Pricing: Success, Failure and Feasibility. New Delhi,India: Taylor & Francis, pp. 37–58, 2009.
[25] De Luca, S. & Papola, A., Evaluation of travel demand management policies in theurban area of Naples. Advances in Transport, 8, pp. 185–194, 2001.
[26] Montella, B., D'Acierno, L. & Gallo, M., A multimodal approach for determining optimalpublic transport fares. Journal of Applied Sciences, 14(21), pp. 2767–2781, 2014.DOI: 10.3923/jas.2014.2767.2781.
[27] D'Acierno, L., Placido, A., Botte, M. & Montella, B., A methodological approachfor managing rail disruptions with different perspectives. International Journal ofMathematicalModels and Methods in Applied Sciences, 10, pp. 80–86, 2016.
[28] D'Acierno, L., Gallo, M., Montella, B. & Placido, A., The definition of a model frameworkfor managing rail systems in the case of breakdowns. Proceedings of IEEE ITSC2013 – 16th International IEEE Annual Conference on Intelligent TransportationSystems,The Hague, The Netherlands, pp. 1059–1064, 2013.