Alejandro Ortega | Simon Blainey | John Preston
OPEN ACCESS
Over the last twenty years, the railways in Britain have seen rapid growth, with patronage doubling and the level of train service increasing by 50%. However, these successes have also led to challenges. In particular real unit costs are estimated to have increased by 50%, with particularly marked increases in infrastructure renewal and enhancement costs. Against this background, the University of Southampton have been leading the Track 21 and Track to the Future projects, funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. These projects are assessing how to make ballasted track systems more durable given higher traffic levels and how to reduce the costs of maintenance and renewal.
Track 21 considered a number of engineering interventions of which this paper focusses on one, under sleeper pads (USPs). The cost implications of this intervention are assessed for the South West Main Line using an industry-specific model, VTISM (vehicle track interaction strategic model), adapted in two ways. First, the results of laboratory experiments from specialist test rigs are incorporated into the model. Secondly, the wider effects of increased reliability, improved ride quality and reduced vibration are also considered within a cost-benefit analysis framework. It is found that USPs can lead to substantial financial savings and, depending on assumptions concerning noise impacts, are likely to have substantial wider social benefits.
CBA, maintenance costs, under sleeper pads
[1] Ortega, A., Vassallo, J., Guzmán, A. & Pérez-Martínez, P., Are Longer and HeavierVehicles (LHVs) beneficial for society? A cost benefit analysis to evaluate their potentialimplementation in Spain. Transport Reviews: A Transnational TransdisciplinaryJournal, 34(2), pp. 150–168, 2014. DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2014.891161.
[2] Nash, C., Unification of accounts and marginal costs for transport efficiency: Finalreport, s.l.: ITS, University of Leeds, 2003.
[3] Brons, M., Nijkamp, P., Pels, E. & Rietveld, P., Railroad noise: economic valuationand policy. Transportation Research D, 8, pp. 169–184, 2003. DOI: 10.1016/S1361-9209(02)00048-2.
[4] Strand, J. & Vagnes, M., The relationship between property values and railroad proximity:a study based on hedonic prices and real estate brokers’ appraisals. Transportation, 28,pp. 137–156, 2001.
[5] Bristow, A., Wardman, M. & Chintakayala, V., International meta-analysis of statedpreference studies of transportation noise nuisance. Transportation, 42, pp. 71–100,2015. DOI: 10.1007/s11116-014-9527-4.
[6] Janic, M., An assessment of the performance of the European long intermodal freighttrains (LIFT). Transportation Research Part A, 42, pp. 1326–1339, 2008. DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2008.06.008.
[7] Clausen, U., Doll, C., Franklin, F.J., Franklin, G.V., Heinrichmeyer, H., Kochsiek, J.,Rothengatter, W. & Sieber, N., Reducing railway noise pollution, Brussels: EuropeanParliament, Directorate-General for Internal Policies, 2012.
[8] Grujicˇic´, D., Ivanovic´, I., Jovic´, J. & Đoric´, V., Customer perception of service quality inpublic. Transport, 29(3), pp. 285–295, 2014. DOI: 10.3846/16484142.2014.951685.
[9] Hardy, A., Measurement and assessment of noise within passengers trains. Journal ofSound and Vibration, 31(3), pp. 819–829, 2000. DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.1999.2565.
[10] Schwanitz, S., Wittkowski, M., Rolny, V. & Basner, M., Pressure variations on a train –Where is the threshold to railway passenger discomfort? Applied Ergonomics, 44(2),pp. 200–209, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.07.003
[11] Castellanos, J. C. & Fruett, F., Embedded system to evaluate the passenger comfortin public transportation based on dynamical vehicle behavior with user’s feedback.Measurement, 47, pp. 442–451, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2013.08.068.
[12] Wardman, M. & Whelan, G., Rolling stock quality – Improvements and willingness ofusers to pay, s.l.: Working paper. University of Leeds, 1998.
[13] Johnson, D., Abrantes, P. & Wardman, M., Analysis of Quantitative Research on QualityAttributes for Trams, s.l.: University of Leeds, 2009.
[14] Wardman, M. & Whelan, G., Valuation of improved railway rolling stock: A review ofthe literature and new evidence. Transport Reviews: A Transnational TransdisciplinaryJournal, 21(4), pp. 415–447, 2001. DOI: 10.1080/01441640010020115.
[15] Paulley, N., Balcombe, R., Mackett, R., Titheridge, H., Preston, J., Wardman, M.,Shires, J. & White, P., The demand for public transport: The effects of fares, qualityof service, income and car ownership. Transport Policy, 13, pp. 295–306, 2006. DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.12.004.
[16] Association of Train Operating Companies. Passenger Demand Forecasting Handbookv.5. London: ATOC, 2009.
[17] Bates, J., Jones, P., Polak, J. & Cook, A., The Investigation of Punctuality and Reliability,s.l.: s.n, 2000.
[18] Chang, J.S., Assessing travel time reliability in transport appraisal. Journal of TransportGeography, 18(3), pp. 419–425, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.06.012.
[19] Wardman, M. & Batley, R., Travel time reliability: A review of late time valuations.Transportation, 41, pp. 1041–1069, 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s11116-014-9526-5.
[20] Preston, J., Wall, G., Batley, R., Ibáñez, J. & Shires, J., Impact of delays on passengertrain services: evidence from Great Britain. Transportation Research Record: Journalof the Transportation Research Board, 2117, pp. 14–23, 2009. DOI: 10.3141/2117-03.
[21] Rail, O.R., Performance, Perceptions and Revenue, s.l.: s.n, 1996.
[22] Pieringer, A., Innovative sleeper design with under sleeper pads as an efficient methodto reduce railway induced vibration propagation. Research results of RIVAS. Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, UIUC: Crosstie & Fastening Symposium, 2014.
[23] SERCO., VTISM Version 2.6.6 User Guide, s.l.: SERCO, 2014.
[24] Le Pen, L., Proposed LTSF modification procedures. Southampton: University ofSouthampton, Working Paper, 2015.
[25] Marschnig, S., Lowering track lifecycle costs with sleeper pads. EURAILmag Business& Technology, The magazine for European Rail decision makers, 23, pp. 146–147, 2011.
[26] Zapfe, J., Saurenman, H. & Fidell, S., Ground-Borne Noise and Vibration in BuildingsCaused by Rail Transit, s.l.: TCRP, 2009.
[27] Deutsche Bahn, A. & Hans-Joerg, T., State of the art review of mitigation measureson track. Deliverable D 3.1, s.l.: Railway Induced Vibration Abatement SolutionsCollaborative project, 2011.
[28] Triepaischajonsak, N., The Effect of Sleeper Soffit Pads on Railway Noise, University ofSouthampton: Southampton, 2008.
[29] Nellthorp, J., Bristow, A.L. & Day, B., Introducing willingness-to-pay for noisechanges into transport appraisal: An application of benefit transfer. TransportReviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, 27(3), pp. 327–353, 2007. DOI:10.1080/01441640601062621.
[30] Lakuši, S., Ahac, M. & Haladin, I., Experimental investigation of railway track withunder sleeper pad. Portoroz, Slovenian congress on the roads and traffic, 2010.
[31] Network Rail. Annual Return 2010. Moving ahead. Investing in the future, MiltonKeynes: Network Rail, 2010.
[32] De Palma, A., Picard, N. & Andrieu, L., Risk in transport investments. Networks andSpatial Economics, 12(2), pp. 187–204, 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s11067-009-9109-8.