Integration Between Aircraft and Handling Vehicles During Taxiing Procedures to Improve Airport Sustainability

Integration Between Aircraft and Handling Vehicles During Taxiing Procedures to Improve Airport Sustainability

Maria Nadia Postorino | Luca Mantecchini | Ettore Gualandi

Department of Civil, Energy, Environment and Materials Engineering (DICEAM), Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria, Italy

Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental and Material Engineering (DICAM), School of Engineering and Architecture, University of Bologna, Italy

ITL – Institute on Transport and Logistics, Bologna, Italy

Available online: 
25 May 2016
| Citation



Integration of procedures is an important aspect of the air transport system, which focuses mainly on interoperability, safety and security. While both transport analysts and air operators have studied the integration aspects concerning these main items, less attention has been devoted to some other integration features that could reduce airport environmental impacts. In this article, the integration between handling vehicles and aircraft during taxi-out procedures has been analysed by referring to the proto-typal, semi-robotic vehicle called Taxibot. Aircraft emissions due to taxiing have been modelled for before and after scenarios, this latter referring to the use of the Taxibot. A simulation of the benefits – both environmental and monetary effects – obtained by using the Taxibot system has been made on a medium-size airport in Northern Italy.


airport sustainability, carbon footprint, handling technologies, transport integration


[1] G raham, A., Managing the Airports: An International Prospective, 4th ed., Routledge: London, 2013.

[2] Y u, K.N., Cheung, Y.P., Cheung, T. & Henry, R.C., Identifying the impact of large urban airports on local air quality by nonparametric regression. Atmospheric Environment, 38, pp. 4501–4507, 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.05.034.

[3] Schürmann, G., Schäfer, K., Jahn, C., Hoffmann, H., Bauerfeind, M., Fleuti, E. & Rappenglück, B., The impact of NOx, CO and VOC emissions on the air quality of Zurich airport. Atmospheric Environment, 41, pp. 103–118, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv. 2006.07.030.

[4] Unal, A., Hu, Y., Chang, M.E., Odman, M.T. & Russell, A.G., Airport related emissions and impacts on air quality: application to the Atlanta International Airport. Atmospheric Environment, 39, pp. 5787–5798, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.05.051.

[5] L u, C. & Morrell, P., Determination and applications of environmental costs at different sized airports – aircraft noise and engine emissions. Transportation, 33, pp. 45–61, 2006. DOI: 10.1007/s11116-005-2300-y.

[6] M iyoshi, C. & Mason, K.J., The damage cost of carbon dioxide emissions produced by passengers on airport surface access: the case of Manchester Airport. Journal of Transport Geography, 28, pp. 137–143, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.12.003.

[7] Postorino, M.N. & Mantecchini, L., A transport carbon footprint methodology to assess airport carbon emissions. Journal of Air Transport Management 37, pp. 76–86, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2014.03.001.

[8] International Civil Aviation Organization, International Standards and Recommended Practices, Annex 16, Environmental Protection: Aircraft Engine Emissions, Vol. 2, Montreal, 3rd ed., 2008.

[9] M azaheri, M., Johnson, G.R. & Morawska, L., Particle and gaseous emissions from commercial aircraft at each stage of the landing and takeoff cycle. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(2), pp. 441–446, 2008.

[10] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Aviation and the Global Atmosphere: a Special Report of IPCC Working Groups I and III, eds. Penner, J.E., Lister, D.H., Griggs, D.J., Dokken, D.J. & McFarland, M., Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1999, available at (accessed 1 April 2016).

[11] Nicolas, Y., Taxiing aircraft with engines stopped. FAST Airbus Technical Magazine, 51, pp. 2–10, 2013.

[12] International Civil Aviation Organization, ICAO engine emissions databank, 2010, available at (accessed 1 April 2016).

[13] Nikoleris, T., Gupta, G. & Kistler, M., Detailed estimation of fuel consumption and emissions during aircraft taxi operations at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport. Transportation Research Part D, 16, pp. 302–308, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2011.01.007.

[14] Khadilkar, H. & Balakrishnan, H., Estimation of aircraft taxi fuel burn using flight data recorder archives. Transportation Research Part D, 17(7), pp. 532–537, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2012.06.005.

[15] G uo, R., Zhang, Y. & Wang, Q., Comparison of emerging ground propulsion systems for electrified aircraft taxi operations. Transportation Research Part C, 44, pp. 98–109, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2014.03.006.

[16] Heinrich, M.T., Kelch, F., Magne, P. & Emadi, A., Investigation of regenerative braking on the energy consumption of an electric taxiing system for a single aisle midsize aircraft. In Industrial Electronics Society, IECON 2014, 40th Annual Conference of the IEEE, pp. 3023–3029, 2014.

[17] WheelTug plc. WheelTug Driving Aerospace, available at 1 April 2016).

[18] SAFRAN. EGTS (electric green taxiing system), available at systems- equipment-178/electric-green-taxiing-system/ (accessed 1 April 2016).

[19] R e, F., Viability and state of the art of environmentally friendly aircraft taxiing systems. In IEEE Electrical Systems for Aircraft, Railway and Ship Propulsion (ESARS), 2012, pp. 1–6, 2012.

[20] US Environmental Protection Agency. Emission Facts: Average Carbon Dioxide Emissions Resulting from Gasoline and Diesel Fuel, available at 420f05001.htm#calculating (accessed 1 April 2016).