Investigating the Predictive Capacity of Eulerian CFD to Model Long-Duration Blast Loads on Finite Cross-Section Geometries

Investigating the Predictive Capacity of Eulerian CFD to Model Long-Duration Blast Loads on Finite Cross-Section Geometries

Jack Denny Simon Clubley 

Blast Engineering Research Group, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, UK

Page: 
73-85
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SAFE-V9-N1-73-85
Received: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Published: 
24 January 2019
| Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Typically defined by positive pressure durations over 100ms, long-duration blasts can generate dynamic pressures (blast winds) capable of exerting damaging drag loads on slender structural elements such as columns. With limited availability of appropriate drag coefficients for specific structural geometries or different section orientations, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) can provide a valuable tool for calculating blast interaction and loading on user-specified geometries. Commercially available CFD programs or ‘hydrocodes’ with shock wave modelling capabilities remain based on solving the inviscid Euler equations. the ability to analyse long-duration blasts is still not confidently offered however, with no prior studies examining the accuracy of modelling interaction with relatively much smaller, finite geometries. this remains particularly challenging due to large wavelengths and time durations inherent to long-duration blasts, usually limited by impractical solution domains and computing resource. This paper presents a comparative investigation between numerical simulations and experimental results to assess the predictive capability of Eulerian CFD as a tool for calculating long-duration blast drag loading on an intricate I-section geometry from different angles of incidence. Calculated pressure-time histories on exposed geometry surfaces demonstrated good agreement although reduced accuracy and under-prediction occurred for shielded surfaces manifesting as overestimated net translational loading. Numerical discrepancies were attributed to the inviscid Euler equations underpinning the CFD solver, limiting accuracy when resolving complex aerodynamic flows at bluff I-section orientations. Results of this study provide new understanding and awareness of the numerical capability and limitations of using CFD to calculate long-duration blast loads on intricate geometries.

Keywords: 

blast loading, drag loading, eulerian CFD, long-duration, multi-axis

  References

[1] Steel Construction Institute, “Buncefield Explosion Mechanism Phase 1 (Volumes 1 and 2),” Ascot, 2009.

[2] Atkinson, G. & Cusco, L., Buncefield: a violent, episodic vapour cloud explosion. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 89(6), pp. 360–370, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2011.06.019

[3] Smith, P.D. & Hetherington, J.G., Blast and Ballistic Loading of Structures, CRC Press, Boston, FL, 1994.

[4] Mays, G. & Smith, P., Blast Effects on Buildings, 1st edn. Thomas Telford Limited, London, 1995.

[5] Krauthammer, T., Modern Protective Structures, CRC Press, Boston, FL, 2008.

[6] US Department of Defense (DoD), “UFC 3-340-02, ‘Structures To Resist The Effects Of Accidental Explosions,’” Washington, DC, 2008.

[7] Anderson, J.D., Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Basics with Applications, 3rd Edn, Springer, New York, NY, 2009.

[8] Craft, T.J., Inviscid Flows – Fluid Mechanics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, 2010.

[9] Schraml, S.J. & Hisley, D.M., Euler and Navier-Stokes Simulations of Shock Wave Interaction With a Generic Block Target (ARL-TR-848), 1995.

[10] Rose, T.A., Air3D Version 9.0 - Computational Tool for Airblast Calculations. Engineering Systems Department, Cranfield University, 2006.

[11] Century Dynamics, “AUTODYN.” 2011.

[12] Chapman, T.C., Rose, T.A. & Smith, P.D., Blast wave simulation using AUTODYN2D: a parametric study. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 16(5–6), pp. 777–787, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-743x(95)00012-y

[13] Ballantyne, G.J., Whittaker, A.S., Dargush, G.F. & Aref, A.J., Air-blast effects on structural shapes of finite width. Journal of Structural Engineering, 136(2), pp. 152–159, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000049

[14] Sherkar, P., Whittaker, A.S. & Aref, A.J., Modeling the Effects of Detonations of High Explosives to Inform Blast-Resistant Design (Technical Report MCEER-10-0009), 2010.

[15] Lee, E.L., Hornig, H.C. & Kury, J.W., Adiabatic Expansion of High Explosive Detonation Products (Report UCRL-50422), 1968.

[16] Kingery, C.N. & Bulmash, G., Airblast parameters from tnt spherical air burst and hemispherical surface burst (Technical Report ARBRL-TR-02555), 1984.

[17] Fairlie, G.E., The numerical simulation of high explosives using AUTODYN-2D & 3D, 1998.

[18] Børvik, T., Hanssen, A.G., Langseth, M. & Olovsson, L., Response of structures to planar blast loads – a finite element engineering approach. Computers & Structures, 87(9–10), pp. 507–520, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.02.005

[19] Clubley, S.K., Non-linear long duration blast loading of cylindrical shell structures. Engineering Structures, 59, pp. 113–126, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.10.030