OPEN ACCESS
Risk and reliability criteria are well established in many industrial sectors such as the offshore, chemical or nuclear industries. Comparative risk thresholds have been specified to allow a responsible organization or regulator to identify activities, which impose an acceptable level of risk concerning the participating individuals, or society as a whole. The scope of this contribution is to present target reliability criteria based on acceptable human safety levels. Application of theoretical principles is illustrated by examples of railway engineering structures. Initially it is shown how civil engineering structures for which human safety criteria play a role are classified according to Eurocodes. Examples include bridges, tunnels or station buildings. The general concepts for risk acceptance are then briefly reviewed, particularly in their relation to the target reliability criteria. The distinction between the two types of criteria is made: group risk and the acceptance criterion based on the Life Quality Index LQI approach introduced by ISO 2394:2015. The differences between the criteria for new and existing structures are discussed. The application is illustrated by an example of a bridge crossing an important railway line. It appears that while benefits and costs of a private stakeholder or public authority are reflected by economic optimisation, the society should define the limits for human safety to achieve uniform risks for various daily-life activities and across different industrial sectors.
group risk, human safety, individual risk, Life Quality Index, railway, risk acceptance, structure, target reliability
[1] Sykora, M., Holicky, M., Jung, K. & Diamantidis, D., Railway RAM and safety handbook (Chapter 45: Target reliability for new and existing railway civil engineering structures, accepted for publication), CRC Press/ Balkema: Leiden, 2017.
[2] UIC 777-2, UIC Code 777-2, Structures built over railway lines, Construction requirements in the track zone, International Union of Railways: 2002.
[3] EN 1990, Eurocode - Basis of structural design, CEN: Brussels, pp. 87, 2002.
[4] HSE, Reducing risks, protecting people, Health & Safety Executive: Norwich (UK), pp. 88, 2001.
[5] CIB TG 32, Risk assessment and risk communication in civil engineering (Report 259), CIB: Rotterdam, 2001.
[6] DNV GL, Harmonised risk acceptance criteria for transport of dangerous goods, European Commission DG-MOVE: pp. 183, 2014.
[7] JCSS, Probabilistic assessment of existing structures. Joint Committee on Structural Safety, edited by D. Diamantidis, RILEM Publications S.A.R.L., 2001.
[8] Steenbergen, R.D.J.M., Sykora, M., Diamantidis, D., Holicky, M. & Vrouwenvelder, A.C.W.M., Economic and human safety reliability levels for existing structures. Structural Concrete, 16, pp. 323–332, 015. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201500022
[9] fib COM3 TG3.1, Partial factor methods for existing structures (fib bulletin 80, recommendation), fib: pp. 129, 2016.
[10] Jonkman, S.N., van Gelder, P.H.A.J.M. & Vrijling, J.K., An overview of quantitative risk measures for loss of life and economic damage. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 99(1), pp. 1–30, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3894(02)00283-2
[11] Vrouwenvelder, T., Leira, B.J. & Sykora, M., Modelling of hazards. Structural Engineering International, 22(1), pp. 73–78, 2012. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686612x13216060213356
[12] Tanner, P. & Hingorani, R., Acceptable risks to persons associated with building structures. Structural Concrete, 16(3), pp. 314–322, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201500012
[13] Vrijling, J., van Gelder, P. & Ouwerkerk, S., Criteria for acceptable risk in the Netherlands. Infrastructure Risk Management Processes, American Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 143–157, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784408155.ch05
[14] Trbojevic, V.M., Another look at risk and structural reliability criteria. Structural Safety, 31(3), pp. 245–250, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.019
[15] ISO 2394, General principles on reliability for structures. ISO: Geneve, Switzerland, pp. 111, 2015.
[16] Diamantidis, D., Holicky, M. & Sykora, M., Target reliability levels based on societal, economic and environmental consequences of structural failure (accepted for publication). Proc. ICOSSAR 2017, CRC Press/Balkema: Leiden (The Netherlands), pp. 10, 2017.
[17] Diamantidis, D., Zuccarelli, F. & Westhäuser, A., Safety of long railway tunnels. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 67(2), pp. 135–145, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0951-8320(99)00059-9
[18] Melchers, R.E., Structural reliability analysis and prediction, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Chichester, England, pp. 437, 2001.
[19] Sykora, M., Holicky, M., Jung, K. & Diamantidis, D., Target reliability for railway civil engineering structures (accepted for publication). Proceedings ESREL 2017, Taylor and Francis/ Balkema: Leiden, 2017.
[20] Rackwitz, R., Optimization - the basis of code-making and reliability verification. Structural Safety, 22(1), pp. 27–60, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-4730(99)00037-5
[21] Holicky, M., Optimisation of the target reliability for temporary structures. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 30(2), pp. 87–96, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2012.733373
[22] Holicky, M., Diamantidis, D. & Sykora, M., Determination of target safety for structures. Proceeding of ICASP12, eds. T. Haukaas, pp. 8, 2015.
[23] Sykora, M., Holicky, M., Jung, K. & Diamantidis, D., Target reliability for existing structures considering economic and societal aspects. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 13(1), pp. 181–194, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2016.1198394
[24] Steenbergen, R.D.J.M. & Vrouwenvelder, A.C.W.M., Safety philosophy for existing structures and partial factors for traffic loads on bridges. Heron, 55(2), pp. 123–139, 2010.
[25] Holicky, M., Markova, J. & Sykora, M., Target reliability levels in present standards. Transactions of the VSB - Technical University of Ostrava, Civil Engineering Series, 14(2), pp. 46–53, 2014.
[26] Fischer, K., Virguez, E., Sánchez-Silva, M. & Faber, M.H., On the assessment of marginal life saving costs for risk acceptance criteria. Structural Safety, 44, pp. 37–46, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2013.05.001
[27] Sykora, M., Holicky, M. & Markova, J., Verification of existing reinforced concrete bridges using the semi-probabilistic approach. Engineering Structures, 56, pp. 1419–1426, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.07.015
[28] Caspeele, R., Sykora, M., Allaix, D.L. & Steenbergen, R., The design value method and adjusted partial factor approach for existing structures. Structural Engineering International, 23(4), pp. 386–393, 2013. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686613x13627347100194