Smart Mature Resilience, System Dynamics Based Interactive Learning Environment: A Beta Version

Smart Mature Resilience, System Dynamics Based Interactive Learning Environment: A Beta Version

Marta Iturriza Ahmed A. Abdelgawad Leire Labaka Jaziar Radianti Jose M. Sarriegi Jose J. Gonzalez 

Tecnun, University of Navarre, Spain

Centre for Integrated Emergency Management, University of Agder, Norway

30 September 2017
| Citation



Natural and man-made disasters are becoming more frequent – unfortunately in most cases inevitably. By applying certain set of policies and guidelines, a city could resist, absorb, adapt to and recover from acute shocks and chronic stresses to keep critical services functioning, i.e. be resilient. In 2016, the Smart Mature Resilience, a Horizon-2020 EU project, defined the Resilience Maturity Model to make cities more resilient. In addition, the project is implementing a System Dynamics simulation model to be used by cities in planning and training for resilience. The System Dynamics model is encapsulated in a web-based Interactive Learning Environment, an easy to use Graphical User Interface (GUI). The beta version of the Interactive Learning Environment was tested by the Smart Mature Resilience project partner cities’ representatives and experts in the SMART MATURE RESILIENCE second review workshop in March 2017. The participants formed in groups were supported by moderators; meanwhile recorders took notes and suggestions. This paper introduces the Interactive Learning Environment and its functionalities, in addition to information reported by the recorders for further enhancements.


city resilience, disaster resilience, interactive learning environment, resilience maturity model, resilient tool, smart mature resilience project, system dynamics


[1] Kundzewicz, Z.W., Disaster aftermath. In Encyclopedia of public health, W. Kirch, Ed. Springer Netherlands, pp. 269–284, 2008. Available at: (Accessed 08 May, 2017)

[2] Perrow, C., Next catastrophe: reducing our vulnerabilities to natural, industrial, and terrorist disasters. Princeton University Press, 2011. Available at: stable/j.ctt7t4c1

[3] United Nations Development Programme, A call for action: disaster risk reduction makes development sustainable, 2014 [Online]. Available at: content/dam/undp/library/crisis%20prevention/UNDP_CPR_CTA_20140901.pdf. (accessed 08 May, 2017).

[4] Swiss Re, Natural catastrophes and man-made disasters in 2015: Asia suffers substantial losses, 2016. Available at: en.pdf. (accessed 08 May, 2017).

[5] de Ville de Goyet, C., Marti, R.Z. & Osorio, C., Natural disaster mitigation and relief. In Disease control priorities in developing countries, 2nd ed., D.T. Jamison, J.G. Breman, A.R. Measham, G. Alleyne, M. Claeson, D.B. Evans, P. Jha, A. Mills, & P. Musgrove, Eds. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2006. Available at: books/NBK11792/. (Accessed 08 May, 2017).

[6] United Nations, Living with Risk: a global review of disaster reduction initiatives. New York: UNO-Verl, 2004 [Online]. Available at: (Accessed 08 May, 2017)

[7] “What is the EU doing?,” Climate Action - European Commission, 23-November-2016. [Online]. Available at: (accessed 08 May, 2017).

[8] Valdés, H.M., Amaratunga, D. & Haigh, R., Making cities resilient: from awareness to implementation. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 4(1), pp. 5–8, 2013.

[9] Oteng-Ababio, M., Sarfo, K.O. & Owusu-Sekyere, E., Exploring the realities of resilience: case study of Kantamanto market fire in Accra, Ghana. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 12, pp. 311–318, 2015.

[10] Singh-Peterson, L., Salmon, P., Baldwin, C. & Goode, N., Deconstructing the concept of shared responsibility for disaster resilience: a Sunshine Coast case study, Australia. Natural Hazards, 79(2), pp. 755–774, 2015.

[11] “Smart Mature Resilience Project,” Smart Mature Resilience Project. [Online]. Available at: (accessed 07 May, 2017)

[12] Sterman, J., Business dynamics: systems thinking and modelling for a complex world. McGraw Hill Higher Education, 2000.

[13] Maier, F.H. & Größler, A., What are we talking about?—A taxonomy of computer simulations to support learning. System Dynamics Review, 16(2), pp. 135–148, 2000.;2-p

[14] Qudrat-Ullah, H., Better decision making in complex, dynamic tasks: training with human-facilitated interactive learning environments. Springer, 2014.

[15] Groesser, S.N., Mental model of dynamic systems. In Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning, P.D.N.M. Seel, Ed. Springer US, pp. 2195–2200, 2012 [Online]. Available at: (Accessed 04 February, 2015).

[16] Davidsen, P.I., Issues in the design and use of system-dynamics-based interactive learning environments. Simulation & Gaming, 31(2), pp. 170–177, 2000.

[17] Guillén-Nieto, V. & Aleson-Carbonell, M., Serious games and learning effectiveness: The case of It’s a Deal! Computers & Education, 58(1), pp. 435–448, 2012.

[18] Mayer, I., Bekebrede, G., Harteveld, C., Warmelink, H., Zhou, Q., Van Ruijven, T., Lo, J., Kortmann, R. & Wenzler, I., he research and evaluation of serious games: toward a comprehensive methodology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), pp. 502–527, 2014.

[19] Kiili, K., Digital game-based learning: towards an experiential gaming model. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(1), pp. 13–24, 2005.

[20] Kuriger, G.W., Wan, H., Mirehei, S.M., Tamma, S. & Chen, F.F., A web-based lean simulation game for office operations: training the other side of a lean enterprise. Simulation & Gaming, 41(4), pp. 487–510, 2010.

[21] Kebritchi, M., Hirumi, A. & Bai, H., The effects of modern mathematics computer games on mathematics achievement and class motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), pp. 427–443, 2010.

[22] Wouters, P., van Nimwegen, C., van Oostendorp, H. & van der Spek, E.D., A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), pp. 249–265, 2013.

[23] Ke, F., A qualitative meta-analysis of computer games as learning tools. Gaming and Simulations, 2009.

[24] Sitzmann, T., A meta-analytic examination of the instructional effectiveness of computer-based simulation games. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), pp. 489–528, 2011.

[25] Hamari, J., Koivisto, J. & Sarsa, H., Does gamification work? - A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 3025–3034, 2014.

[26] Abdelgawad, A., Radianti, J., Snaprud, M. & Krogstie, J., Experimentation with a system dynamics based interactive learning environment: a case study of accessibility of Norwegian municipalities websites. International Journal of Simulation Systems, Science & Technology, 17(35), pp. 11, 2016.

[27] Abdelgawad, A.A., Radianti, J., Snaprud, M.H. & Krogstie, J., Disabled people from welfare to jobs: an interactive learning environment experimental investigation. In Proceedings of the 34rd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Delft, The Netherlands, 2016. Available at: (accessed 09 Feburary, 2017).

[28] Nakazawa, M., Koizumi, D. & Hirasawa, S., The influence of QoS on e-learning environment under virtual desktop infrastructure, pp. 174–178, 2012.

[29] Aljenaa, E., Al-Anzi, F.S. & Alshayeji, M., Towards an efficient e-learning system based on cloud computing. In Proceedings of the Second Kuwait Conference on e-Services and e-Systems, New York, NY, USA, pp. 13:1–13:7, 2012. Available at: (accessed 22 November, 2016).

[30] Kitanov, S. & Davcev, D., Mobile cloud computing environment as a support for mobile learning, pp. 99–105, 2012. [31] Masud, M.A.H. & Huang, X., A novel approach for adopting cloud-based e-learning system. 2012 IEEE/ACIS 11th International Conference on Computer and Information Science, pp. 37–42, 2012.