Surface-to-seabed Safety: Advantages of Simulator Practice for Subsea Installation

Surface-to-seabed Safety: Advantages of Simulator Practice for Subsea Installation

L. Vederhus Y. Pan 

Faculty of Maritime Technology and Operations, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway

Page: 
301-309
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SAFE-V6-N2-301-309
Received: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Published: 
30 June 2016
| Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Controlling elements of massive weights from surface to seabed and manoeuvring components in narrow spaces within employed modules are just some of the challenges in subsea installations. We report from a specific case of training and installation in a gas field off the Norwegian coastline. Here, two compressor trains, installed at a depth of about 300 m, now enhance exploitation of field reserves and diminish air pollution by eradicating gas compression from the surface to subsea process. In order to reduce risk and increase efficiency, simulator facilities are essential to enable procedure exploration and change, and to elaborate on mental models of subsea operations. The assembled cooperating crew alternates roles of action and observation during simulation sessions, thus allowing a more complete picture of the operation. The simulation sessions are reported to have speeded up the installation, indi- cating risk mitigation. We encourage further research on procedure investigations by utilisation of the simulator for subsea activities.

Keywords: 

infrastructure, safety, simulator, subsea

  References

[1] Holland, J.H., Complexity: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.

[2] Byrne, D., and G. Callaghan, Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences : the State of the Art, Routledge: London and New York, 2014.

[3] Zeller, J., O.P. Riis, and G.S. Reinbacher, The Challenge of Complexity. Applied  philosophy, Aalborg University Press: Aalborg, 2013.

[4] Saldaña, J., The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers,  Sage: London; Thousand Oaks, CA, 2009.

[5] Bannon, L., From Human Factors to Human Actors: the Role of Psychology and Human-Computer Interaction Studies in System Design. Design at work, pp. 25-44, 1991.

[6] Orlikowski, W.J., Learning from Notes: Organizational Issues in Groupware Implementation. Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, ACM: Toronto, Ontario, Canada. pp. 362-369, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/143457.143549

[7] Orlikowski, W., Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations. Resources, Co-Evolution and Artifacts, Springer: London, pp. 255-305, 2008.