Climate Change Adaptation: Use and Value of a Climate Buffer Area

Climate Change Adaptation: Use and Value of a Climate Buffer Area

F. Bal J.M. Vleugel 

RISSK, Haarlem, The Netherlands

Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands

Page: 
193-206
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SAFE-V4-N3-193-206
Received: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Published: 
30 September 2014
| Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Most climate researchers agree that the changing world climate may irrevocably threaten life on our planet. It is no coincidence that water is involved in climate change, because the earth surface and atmosphere largely consist of water in different physical states and dimensions. Climate change becomes visible in less predictable and more severe weather conditions, like excessive rainfall and wind. These show up with a higher frequency and intensity, even in areas that never before experienced them. Seasonal patterns may fade or deepen and become more irregular. More sustainable human behaviour may on paper reduce the pace of or even reverse climate change. Widespread lack of such behaviour by a growing world population consciously replicating western-style consumerism makes it unlikely that real progress occurs in the foreseeable future. Comparable to an area like transport, only technical solutions may help to relieve the pressure. Water management has been used to allow humans to live safely on land for thousands of years. Many of the current water management systems are not up to the task anymore. Flooding of villages and cities is a growing global problem. Replacing out-dated systems is time consuming and very expensive, while political will seems hard to mobilize. But, if frequency and intensity of precipitation will stay at a higher level in future, cautious action is needed to prevent disasters. This paper will discuss a Dutch plan for a multifunctional area that would allow management of excessive water volumes. Adding a water retention area leads to higher investment costs, but benefi ts like enhanced protection may outweigh these higher costs. Given the unknown future risk and cost of fl ooding, damage costs may be much higher than assumed. From a no-regret perspective, it is wise to carry out projects, which currently have a (slightly) negative benefi t-cost ratio

Keywords: 

buffering, climate change, economic valuation, rainfall

  References

[1] Lenderink, G. & Meijgaard, E. van, Linking Changes in Hourly Precipitation Extremes to the Clausius-Clapeyron Relation, KNMI: Utrecht, 2010. http://www.knmi.nl/cms/ content/90945/linking changes in hourly precipitation extremes_to_the_clausius-clapeyron_relation.

[2] Kante, B., Local capacities for global agendas. impact of cities on the global environ-ment, UNEP Conference, Barcelona, 15 September 2004.

[3] Wikipedia. Hurricane Katrina. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Katrina. A 150 km dyke may cost up to US$ 8 bln. Technisch Weekblad, 24, p. 3, 2013.

[4] IF Technology and partners, Waterberging in de diepte. Hoofdrapport: Arnhem, 2005.

[5] Keizer, A.J., Leidraad voor beperking overstromingsschade na doorbraak regionale waterkeringen, MSc thesis, Technical University Twente, 2008.

[6] City of Edmonton, California, USA. http://www.edmonton.ca/environmental/docu-ments/Background_Report Wetland Buffer_ER_Dedication_Guidelines.pdf.

[7] WorldPress.com. The twentyten blog. Sustainable Stormwater Management, avail-able at http://sustainablestormwater.org/ 2009/05/28/stormwater-101-detention-and- retention-basins.

[8] Communications Bureau de Lynx, Wageningen, The Netherlands, Klimaatbuffers in Nederland, available at http://klimaatbuffers.nl/projects/peat-areas.

[9] Bos, E.J., & Bergh, J.C.J.M. van den, Economic Evaluation, Land/Water Use, and Sus-tainable Nature, Conservation of “De Vechtstreek” Wetlands, Research Memorandum 98036, Free University, Amsterdam, 1998.

[10] Reijnders, L., Klimaatverandering en regenval, 2007, available at www.kennislink.nl.

[11] WL|Delft Hydraulics, Overstromingsrisico’s in Nederland in een veranderend klimaat, Delft, 2007.

[12] Provincie Noord-Holland, Monitor Woningbouw 2010, Provincie Noord-Holland: Haarlem, 2011.

[13] LPBL, MKBA in duurzame gebiedsontwikkeling, Duurzaam waarderen en verzilveren, LPBL: Amsterdam, 2010.

[14] Projectgroep Haarlemmermeer-Bollenstreek, Gebiedsuitwerking HaarlemmermeerBollenstreek – Resultaat Projectenveloppen, Haarlem, 2005.

[15] See reference [13].

[16] CPB, Beoordeling Westfl ank Haarlemmermeer, Notitie voor het Ministerie voor Milieu en Ruimtelijke Ordening, CPB: Den Haag, 2010.

[17] Berg, M. van den, De maatschappelijke kosten-baten analyse (MKBA) van evaluatieinstrument naar sturingsinstrument bij natuurprojecten, MSc thesis, ASRE-MSRE, Amsterdam, 2011.

[18] Oregon Department of Transportation, The value of travel-time: estimates of the hourly value of time for vehicles in Oregon 2005, Salem, OR, 2006. See also Colman, R., Full cost accounting of highways: infrastructure defi cit accounting in highway investment analysis, GPI Atlantic, 1998.

[19] See reference 5.

[20] Floods could cost Germany 12 billion euros in economic damage, warns Fitch. Available at http://fi nance.yahoo.com/news/ fl oods-could-cost-germany-12-162855215.html

[21] King, D.M. & Mazzotta, M., Benefi t Transfer Method, available at  http://www.ecosystemvaluation.org/benefi t_transfer.htm.

[22] Neisingh, P. & Stokman, A., What drives consumer confi dence in times of fi nancial crises? Evidence for The Netherlands, DNB Working Paper No. 394, September 2013.  

[23] Bal., F. & Vleugel, J.M., Improving environmental assessment: methodological considerations and practical solutions, Environmental Impact 2012, eds.  C.A. Brebbia & T-S. Chon, WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment 162, WIT Press: Southampton, pp. 65–74, 2012, ISBN 978-1-84564-604-2.

[24] Gaaff, A., Strookman, M. & Reinhard, S., Kosten en baten van alternatieve inrichtingen van de Horstermeerpolder, Report 4.03.09, LEI, Den Haag, 2003.

[25] PvdA, Noord-Holland maakt zich zorgen over Westfl ank, Koninklijke BDU Uitgevers B.V., Barneveld, 2012.

[26] Dijkstra, A., Hendriks, E., Molen, P. van der, Posthoorn, P. & Rijsdorp, A., Schetsboek Randmeer Noordoostpolder, RIZA Werkdocument 2000.134, Rijksinstituut voor Integraal Zoetwaterbeheer en Afvalwaterbehandeling, Lelystad, 2000.

[27] Mulder, M., Klaassen, M. & Vreke, J., Economische Graadmeters voor Natuur, DLO Natuurplanburo-onderzoek Werkdocument, 1998/10, DLO, Den Haag, 1998.

[28] Gemeente Haaren, Afvalwegwijzer 2002, Haaren (Noord-Brabant), 2002.

[29] Brouwer, R., Langford, I., Bateman, I., Garrod, G.D. & Turner, K., A Meta-analysis of Wetland Contingent   Valuation Studies, Mimeo, CSERGE, University of East Anglia, Norwich, 1997.

[30] Luijt, J. & Voskuilen, M.J., Bedrijfsuitkomsten in de Nederlandse particuliere bosbouw over 2010, LEI-rapport 2012-053, LEI Wageningen UR, The Hague, July 2012.