Estimation of Repair Costs of Individual Non-Domestic Buildings Damaged by Floods

Estimation of Repair Costs of Individual Non-Domestic Buildings Damaged by Floods

N. Walliman B. Baiche R. Ogden A. Tagg M. Escarameia 

School of Architecture, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK

HR Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK

Page: 
290-306
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SAFE-V3-N4-290-306
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

It is evident that there is no established flood damage prediction tool for individual non-domestic build-ings that can account in any detail for their different types of construction. Unlike domestic buildings, non-domestic buildings often feature several different types of construction within the same premises. This absence makes it difficult for building owners and designers to calculate what appropriate measures should be taken to enhance resilience against floods.

This paper, developed in the context of the European Community FP7 project FloodProBE, and pre-sented at the Sustainable City 2012 Conference, discusses the current estimation methods used in the UK, Germany, USA and Australia, and suggests a way to improve on these by devising a tool capable of estimating damage to individual non-domestic buildings. Standard damage and repair parameters are investigated and the major variables are considered – those related to the flood event such as over-floor depth, velocity, rate of rise, debris, contaminants, frequency and duration of inundation and timing, and those relate to the building characteristics, such as structure, construction, materials and their vulnerability to water and drying characteristics, services and their locations.

The aims and functions of a prototype flood damage estimation tool are described, including the type of users aimed at, and the method of calculation, input data required and types of output delivered. The model is demonstrated on one case study of an actual building damaged by flooding and the predicted cost compared with the actual cost of reinstatement. A sensitivity analysis is made on the flood characteristic inputs.

The conclusions contend that that the prototype tool is worth developing to produce a useful way of predicting the costs of flood damage to individual buildings which will enable calculations to be made for assessing the cost–benefit analysis of installing flood mitigation/resilience measures to the building in order to protect it and its contents.

Keywords: 

Building construction, building flood vulnerability, cost–benefit analysis, critical infrastruc-ture buildings, flood damage prediction, flood mitigation

  References

[1] Walliman, N., Ogden, R., Baiche, B., Tagg, A. & Escarameia, M., Development of a tool to estimate individual building vulnerability to floods. The Sustainable City VII Urban Regeneration and Sustainability – WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment Series, Vol. 155, WIT Press: Southampton, 2012. Available at www.witpress.com

[2] Gissing, A. & Blong, R., Accounting for variability in commercial flood damage estimation. Australian Geographer, 35(2), pp. 209–222, 2004. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/0004918042000249511

[3] Soetanto, R. & Proverbs, D.G., Impact of flood characteristics on damage caused to UK domestic properties: the perceptions of building surveyors. Structural Survey, 22(2), pp. 95–104, 2004. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02630800410538622

[4] Hamann, M. & Reese, S. Wertermittlungen und Schadensanalyse als Instrumente für die Küstenschutzplanung in Schleswig-Holstein. Bremer Beiträge zur Geographie und Raumplanung, 36(S), pp. 139–147, 2000.

[5] Meyer, V. & Messner, F. National Flood Damage Evaluation Methods: A Review of Applied Methods in England, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic and Germany. UFZ-Discussion Papers UFZ–Umweltforschungszentrum. Leipzig–Halle Department Ökonomie: Leipzig, 2005.

[6] Hall, J.W., Dawson, R.J., Sayers, P.B., Rosu, C., Chatterton, J.B. & Deakin, R., A methodology for national-scale flood risk assessment. Water and Maritime Engineer-ing, 156, pp. 235–247, 2003. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/wame.2003.156.3.235

[7] Messner, F., Penning-Rowsell, E., Green, C., Meyer, V., Tunstall, S. & van der Veen, A., Evaluating flood damages: guidance and recommendations on principles and meth-ods. T9-06-01, FLOODsite Project - Integrated Flood Risk Analysis and Management Methodologies, 2007.

[8] Kreibich, H. & Thieken, A.H., Assessment of damage caused by high groundwater inundation. Water Resources Research, 44(9), pp. 6621–39, 2008. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1029/2007WR006621

[9] Bočkarjova, M., Steenge, A.E. & van der Veen, A., On direct estimation of initial damage in the case of a major catastrophe: derivation of the “Basic equation”. Di-saster Prevention and Management, 13(4), pp. 330–337, 2004. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/09653560410556555

[10] Jonkman, S.N., Bočkarjovab, M., Kokc, M. & Bernardinid, B., Integrated hydrodynam-ic and economic modelling of flood damage in the Netherlands. Ecological Economics, 66(1), pp. 77–9015, 2008. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.022

[11] Soetanto, R. & Proverbs, D.G. Impact of flood characteristics on damage caused to UK domestic properties: the perceptions of building surveyors. Structural Survey, 22(2), pp. 95–104, 2010. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02630800410538622

[12] Nicholas, J., Holt, G.D. & Proverbs, D.G., Towards standardising the assessment of flood-damaged properties in the UK. Structural Survey, 19(4), pp. 163–172, 2001. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02630800110406667

[13] Proverbs, D.G., Nicholas, J. & Holt, G.D., Surveying flood damage to domestic dwell-ings: the present stage of knowledge. The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors Research Foundation Paper Series, 3(8), 2000.

[14] Elmer, F., Thieken, A.H., Pech, I., Kreibich, H., Influence of flood frequency on residen-tial building losses. Natural Hazards Earth System Sciences, 10, pp. 2145–2159, 2010. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/nhess-10-2145-2010

[15] BRE Digest, Repair and Renovation of Flood-Damaged Buildings, Building Research Establishment: Watford, 1984.

[16] BRE, Dealing with Flood Damage, Building Research Establishment: Watford, 1991.

[17] Kidd, B., Tagg, A., Escarameia, M., von Christierson, B., Lamond, J. & Proverbs, D., Guidance and Standards for Drying Flood Damaged Buildings. Signposting current guidance – BD2760. CIRIA, Construction Industry Research and Information Associa-tion: London, 2010.

[18] Kelman, I. & Spence, R., A flood failure flowchart for buildings. Municipal Engineer, 156(Sept), pp. 207–214, 2003. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/muen.2003.156.3.207

[19] Kreibich, H., Porith, K., Seifert, I., Maiwald, H., Kunert, U., Schwarz, J., Merz, B. & Thieken, A., Is flow velocity a significant parameter in flood damage modelling? Natu-ral Hazards and Earth Systems Sciences, 9(5), pp. 1679–1692, 2009. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.5194/nhess-9-1679-2009

[20] USACE, Business Depth-Damage Analysis Procedures. Research Rep. 85-R-5, USACE, Engineering Institute for Water Resources: Alexandria, VA, USA, 1985.

[21] Scawthorn, C., Flores, P., Blais, N., Seligson, H., Tate, E., Chang, S., Mifflin, E., Thomas, W., Murphy, M., Jones, C. & Lawrence, M., HAZUS-MH Flood loss estima-tion methodology. II. Damage and loss assessment. Natural Hazard Review, 7(72), pp. 72–82, 2006. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2006)7:2(72)

[22] Nadal, N., Zapata, R., Pagán, I., López, R. & Agudelo, J., Building damage due to river-ine and coastal floods. Journal of Water Resources, Planning and Management, 136(3), pp. 327–336, 2010. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000036

[23] Schwarz, J. & Maiwald, H., Damage and loss prediction model based on the vulnerabil-ity of building type. 4th International Symposium on Flood Defence: Managing Flood Risk, Reliability and Vulnerability, Toronto, Ontario: Canada, 2008.

[24] Nicholas, J., Holt, G.D. & Proverbs, D.G., Towards standardising the assessment of flood damage properties. UK, Structural Survey, 19(4), pp. 163–172, 2001. doi: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1108/02630800110406667

[25] Penning-Rowsell, E.C., Johnson, C., Tunstall, S., Tapsell, S., Morris, J., Chatterton, J., Coker, A. & Green, C., The Benefits of Flood and Coastal Defence: Techniques and Data for 2003. Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University: London, 2003.

[26] Proverbs, D.G. & Soetanto, R., Flood Damaged Property, Wiley: Chichester, U.K., 2004.

[27] BSI (British Standard Institution), PAS 64Professional Water Damage 122 Flood Hazard: Impacts and Responses for the Built Environment, BSI: London, 2005.

[28] Garvin, S., Reid, J. & Scott, M., CIRIA Report C623 - Standards for the Repair of Buildings Following Flooding, CIRIA: London, 2005.

[29] Garvin, S. & Kelly, D., Flood repair standards for buildings. Advances in Urban Flood Management, eds. R. Ashley, S. Garvin, E. Pasche, A. Vassilopoulos & C. Zevenbergen, Taylor and Francis: London, 2007.