A new approach was used to elicit relative values of a variety of natural and cultural resources to estimate the extent that managers thought these resources would be enhanced or harmed by wildfire. This method, while based on economic principles of utility, does not involve monetary valuation. The method is illustrated by elicitation of relative values of different forest types, wildlife habitat and archaeological/cultural resources from resource professionals and managers in Grand Canyon, Rocky Mountain, Sequoia–Kings Canyon and Yellowstone National Parks. While these elicitations were independently performed for each park, the relative protection and improvement values of the various resources are remarkably similar. This similarity may reflect the common and well-focused mandate that national parks operate under. The management implications of the protection and improvement values of natural and cultural resources for wildland fire management at these and other national parks are discussed.
Disturbance, Grand Canyon, Rocky Mountain, Sequoia–Kings Canyon, value elicitation, wildland fire, Yellowstone
 U.S. Senate, Appropriations Bill, Department of the Interior, E., and Related Agencies, 2008.
 FEC (Fire Executive Council). Guidance for implementation of Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy. [cited 28 August 2009]; http://www.nifc.gov/policies/guidance/ GIFWFMP.pdf
 Samuelson, P.A., The pure theory of Public Expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 36, pp. 387–389, 1954. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1925895
 Samuelson, P.A., Diagrammatic Exposition of a Theory of Public Expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 37, pp. 350–356, 1955. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/ 1925849
 Champ, P.A., Boyle, K.J. & Brown, T.C. (eds). A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation, Klu-wer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003.
 Holmes, T.P., Prestemon, J.P. & Abt, K.L., An introduction to the economics of forest disturbance (Chapter 1), in The Economics of Forest Disturbances: Wildfires, Storms, and Invasive Species, eds T.P. Holmes, J.P. Prestemon & K.L. Abt, Springer Science + Business Media B. V. pp. 3–14, 2008.
 Rideout, D.B., Ziesler, P.S., Kling, R., Loomis, J.B. & Botti, S.J., Estimating rates of substitution for protecting values at risk for initial attack planning and budgeting. Forest Policy and Economics, 10, pp. 205–219, 2008. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol. 2007.10.003
 Shrestha, R., Rosenberger, R., & Loomis, J.B., Benefit Transfer Using Meta-Analysis in Recreation Economic Valuation, in Benefit Transfer Accuracy: Meta-Analytic Review of the Literature, in Environmental Value Transfer: Issues and Methods, eds S. Navrud & R. Ready, Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007.
 Review and Update of the 1995 Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy, National Interagency Fire Center, Boise, Idaho, 2001.
 Latinopoulos, D., Valuing the services of coastal ecosystems: a meta-analysis of contin-gent valuation studies. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 1, pp. 13–30, 2010.
 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service (NPS). Management Policies. [cited 18 July 2011]; http://www.nps.gov/policy/mp2006.pdf
 Rosenberger, R. & Loomis, J.B., Benefit Transfer, in A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation, eds P.A. Champ, K.J. Boyle & T.C. Brown, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0826-6_12