Increased scrutiny of federally funded programs combined with changes in fire management reflects a demand for new fire program analysis tools. We formulated an integer linear programming (ILP) model for initial attack resource allocation that operates in a performance-based, cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) environment. The model optimizes the deployment of initial attack resources for a user-defined set of fires that a manager would like to be prepared for across alternative budget levels. The model also incorporates fire spread, multiple ignitions, simultaneous ignitions, and monitoring of resources on a landscape. It also evaluates the cost effectiveness of alternate firefighting resources and alternative pre-positioning locations. Fires that escape initial attack are costly during the extended attack phase of fire management. To address this within the scope of initial attack, we constructed and analyzed alternative objective functions that incorporate a proxy for internalizing the cost of fires that escape initial attack. This type of model can provide the basis for a wider scale formulation with the potential to measure an organization’s performance and promote a higher level of accountability and efficiency in fire programs.
fire escape, initial attack, integer linear programming, optimal deployment, performance, wildland fire
 United States General Accounting Offi ce (GAO), Wildland Fire Management: I mproved Planning Will Help Agencies Better Identify Fire-Fighting Preparedness Needs, Report GAO-02-158. United States General Accounting Offi ce: Washington, D. C., 35 p., 2002.
 United States Government Accountability Offi ce (GAO), Wildland Fire Management: Forest Service and Interior Need to Specify Steps and a Schedule for Identifying L ong-Term Options and Their Costs, Testimony GAO-05-353T, United States Government Accountability Offi ce: Washington, D. C., 15 p., 2005.
 Mills, T.J. & Bratten, F.W., FEES: Design of a Fire Economics Evaluation System, USDA Forest Service General Technical Report No. PSW-65. 26 p., 1982.
 USDA Forest Service, Fire Management Analysis and Planning Handbook WO Amendment 5109.19. USDA Forest Service: Washington, D. C., 1991.
 Gilless, K.J. & Fried, J.S., Stochastic representation of fi re behavior in a wildland fi re protection planning model for California. Forest Science., 45, pp. 492–499, 1998.
 McAlpine, R.S. & Hirsch, K.G., LEOPARDS - Level of protection analysis software. Forestry Chronicle, 75, pp. 615–621, 1998.
 Wiitala, M.R. & Wilson, A.E., Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Fire Economics, Planning and Policy: A Global View. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-208, ed. Gonzalez-Caban, A. Pacifi c Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture: Albany, CA, 720 p., 2004.
 Parks, G.M., Development and application of a model for suppression of forest fi res. Management Science, 10, pp. 760–766, 1964. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ mnsc.10.4.760
 Parlar, M. & Vickson, R.G., Optimal forest fi re control: an extension of Parks’ model. Forest Science, 28, pp. 345–355, 1982.
 Parlar, M., Optimal forest fi re control with limited reinforcements. Optimal Control Application and Methods, 4, pp. 185–191, 1983. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ oca.4660040208
 Aneja, Y.P. & Parlar, M., Optimal staffi ng of a forest fi re fi ghting organization. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 14, pp. 589–594, 1984. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/ x84-106
 Boychuk, D. & Martell, D.L., A Markov chain model for evaluating seasonal fores fi re fi ghter requirements. Forest Science, 34, pp. 647–661, 1988.
 Donovan, G.H. & Rideout, D.B., An integer programming model to optimize resource allocation for wildfi re containment. Forest Science, 49, pp. 331–335, 2003.
 Haight, R.G. & Fried, J.S., Deploying wildland fi re suppression resources with a s cenario-based standard response model. Information Systems and Operational Research, 45(1), pp. 31–39, 2007. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/infor.45.1.31
 Bevers, M., A chance contraint estimation approach to optimizing resource management under uncertainty. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 37(11), pp. 2270–2280, 2007. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/X07-076
 Rideout, D.B. & Omi, P.N., Alternate expressions for the economic theory of forest fi re management. Forest Science, 36(3), pp. 614–624, 1990.
 Rideout, D.B. et al., Estimating rates of substitution for protecting values at risk for initial attack planning and budgeting. Forest Policy and Economics, 10(2), pp. 205–219, 2008. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2007.10.003
 Bradley, M. et al., The national wildfi re prediction program: a key piece of the wildfi re solution. The Joint Fire Science Conference and Workshop: Boise, ID, 2000.
 Miller, C., Davis, B., & Black, A., Using the probability of burning to plan for wildland fi re use. 2nd International Wildland Fire Ecology and Fire Management Congress, Orlando, FL, 2003.
 Prestemon, J.P. et al., Understanding broad-scale wildfi re risks in a human-dominated landscape. Forest Science, 48, pp. 685–693, 2002.
 Westerling, A.L. et al., Long lead statistical forecasts of western U.S. wildfi re area burned. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 11(3,4), pp. 257–266, 2002.
 Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Interagency standards for fi re and aviation operations, BLM Handbook 9213-1, 2003.
 Coase, R.H., The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 34, pp. 1–44, 1960. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/466560
 Mees, R.M., Simulating initial attack with two fi re containment models. USDA Forest Service Research Note PSW-378. 7 p., 1985.
 National Wildfi re Coordinating Group (NWCG), Fireline Handbook, NWCG Handbook 3, PMS410-1, NFES 0065, Boise, ID, 1998.