The intent of a masterplanning process is to enable and expedite urban change but sometimes this process is fraught with dissatisfaction. This paper examines the perceptual and conceptual aspects of the masterplanning process and asks (a) What urban qualities make a good place? (b) What are the priorities of a conceptual mas- terplanning process? and (c) What are the short-term and long-term priorities of a contextual masterplanning process? The participants’ results show that urban density and connectivity are the most important aspects of masterplanning places and that stakeholders need an urban change process to enable certainty in the short term and adaptability in the long term. It is proposed that small world network models offer a self-organizing frame- work for masterplanning short-term and long-term urban change.
masterplanning process, small world network metaphor, self-organizing, adaptable, South East Queensland, place making
 Watts, D.J. & Strogatz, S., Collective dynamics of ‘small world’ networks. Nature, 393(4), pp. 440–442, 1998. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/30918
 Barabasi, A.-L. & Albert, R, Emergence and scaling in random networks. Science, 286, pp. 509–512, 1999. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509
 Batty, M., Cities as small worlds. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28, pp. 637–638, 2001. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/b2805ed
 Hillier, B. & Hanson, J., The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press: London, 1984. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597237
 Hillier, B. & Penn, A., Rejoinder to Carlo Ratti. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31, pp. 501–511, 2004. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/b3019a
 Ratti, C., Urban texture and space syntax: some inconsistencies. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31, pp. 1–15, 2004. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/b3019
 Bafna, S., Space syntax: a brief introduction to its logic and analytical techniques, Environment and Behavior, 35, pp. 17–29, 2003. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916502238863
 Osman, K.M. & Suliman, M. The space syntax methodology: fits and misfits. Architecture and Behaviour, 10(2), pp. 189–204, 1994.
 de Roo, G., Being or becoming? that is the question! confronting complexity with contem- porary planning theory. A Planner’s Encounter with Complexity, In: G. de Roo & E.A. Silva, Ashgate: Farnham, pp. 19–40, 2010.
 Guare, J., Six Degrees of Separation: a play. Vintage Books: New York, 1990.
 Milgram, S., The small world problem. Psychology Today, 2, pp. 60–67, 1967.
 Kleinberg, J.M., Navigation in a small world. Nature, 406, pp. 845, 2000. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35022643
 Watts, D.J. Six Degrees: the science of a connected age. Norton: New York, 2003.
 Watts, D.J. Small Worlds: the dynamics of networks between order and randomness. Princeton University Press: Princeton, p. 45, 1999.
 Wasserman, S. & Faust, K., Social Network Analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1994. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478
 Scott, J., Social Network Analysis: a handbook. SAGE Publications Inc: London, 2000.
 Trochim, W., available at www.socialresearchmethods.net/mapping/mapping.htm. 2009.
 English Partnerships. Urban Design Compendium. 2008.
 Ganis, M., Minnery, J. & Mateo-Babiano, D, The small world of stakeholder groups: cascading concepts for urban change. WIT Conference Proceedings: Sustainable Development and Plan- ning. Wessex Institute of Technology Publications: Ashurst Lodge, UK, 2011.