Regional Energy Concepts – Based on Alternative Biomass Cultivation for Rural Areas and Its Efficient Energy Usage

Regional Energy Concepts – Based on Alternative Biomass Cultivation for Rural Areas and Its Efficient Energy Usage

C. Konrad J. Strittmatter A. Grunert M. Brule | M. Roth M. Herter G. Göttlicher R. Biehl A. Bott

EUROPEAN INSTITUTE for Energy Research EIFER, Karlsruhe, Germany

Energie Baden-Württemberg AG (EnBW), Karlsruhe, Germany

Erdgas Südwest GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany

Page: 
59-74
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V8-N1-59-74
Received: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Published: 
31 January 2013
| Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

n the German electric energy market, the share of regional and decentralized power generation based on renewables has become more and more significant. The following study describes the initiative of the energy and utilities company ‘EnBW Energie Baden-Württemberg AG’ (EnBW) in Germany to investigate regional energy concepts based on agricultural biomass. The study focuses on two aspects: the development of more sustainable approaches for energy crops cultivation and the efficient use of cogeneration heat produced by bioenergy-driven power plants in rural areas. For the development of concepts and tools, a study area including two counties in the South-West of Germany were chosen. This article focuses on the work done on the county of Ravensburg.Geographic information system (GIS) tools are used to collect data about current land use practices related to energy crops. Subsequently, the suitability of new and more sustainable energy crops for biogas production based on current production regimes is investigated by following a modeling approach. The approach followed includes the screening of new agricultural substrates as substitutes for maize, which is currently the dominant energy crop for biogas production in Germany, the modeling of new substrate mixtures, and the measurement of the methane potential of energy crop samples in a biogas laboratory. Bioenergy-driven power plants are usually implemented nearby high biomass potentials—in rural areas, where heat demand is scarce. Optimizing heat use in combined heat and power (CHP) generators is a major issue for the future of bioenergy. The efficient utilization of residual heat is one of the targets of the upcoming update of the German Renewable Energy Sources Act in 2012. Therefore, the profitable operation of biogas plants increasingly depends on the level of heat use which can be reached. The possibilities for heat supply to potential consumers in rural areas have been investigated using a GIS methodology on an object-based level for residential and tertiary/industry sectors. Building age and type have been used as parameters to estimate the annual heat consumption. Scenarios illustrating a renovation rate of the investigated objects (buildings) have been calculated. For the purpose of verification and calibration, measurements of the heat demand of more than 3,000 houses have been used. Furthermore, on the basis of existing biogas plants, a techno-economic comparison of heat networks with micro gas networks for the distribution of renewable energy to demand sites have been performed.

Keywords: 

biodiversity, biogas, biomass potential, building, district heating, GIS, heat demand, heat sinks, micro gas grid, substrate

  References

[1] Ministerium fur Landlichen Raum, Ernahrung und Verbraucherschutz, 2011.

[2] Stenull, M., Hardtlein, M., Eltrop, L., Dederer, M., Messner, J., Are biogas plants in BadenWurttemberg effi cient, in: Progress in Biogas II. Universitat Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany, 30.03-01.04.2011.

[3] Wirtschaftsministerium Baden-Wurttemberg. Biomasse-Aktionsplan Baden-Wurttemberg – Fortschreibung, 2010.

[4] EnBW (2011): EEG-Anlagendaten in der Regelzone der EnBW Transportnetze AG http://www.enbw-transportnetze.de/eeg-and-kwk-g/eeg-anlagendaten/(Version: Mai 2011).

[5] Statistisches Landesamt Baden-Wurttemberg, Agrarstruktur in Baden-Wurttemberg, 2007.

[6] Faustzahlen Biogas, Kuratorium fur Technik und Bauwesen in der Landwirtschaft e. V. (KTBL), 2008.

[7] University of Wurzburg, Differentiation of crop- and grassland based on time series analysis of satellite data.- University of Wurzburg, Institute of Geography, Remote Sensing Department, 2010.

[8] Miller, U. (2010): Bioenergie-Nutzung aus Sicht eines Naturschutzverbandes.- Statement beim Netzwerk Naturschutz Tubingen 19.11.2010, BUND Ravensburg; http://www. rp.baden-wuerttemberg.de/servlet/PB/show/1322061/rpt-netzw-penum-2010-miller.pdf (Version: 17.06.2011).

[9] Konrad, C., Mast, B. Graeff-Honninger, S., Claupein, W., Bolduan, R., Skok, J., Strittmatter, J., Brule, M. & Gottlicher, G. (2011), Bioenergy for regions – alternative cropping systems and optimisation of local heat supply, Energy and Sustainability III, 3rd International Conference on Energy and Sustainability, 11-13.04.2011. Alicante, Spain. ISBN 978-1-84564-508-3.

[10] INFAS; http://www.infas-geodaten.de/

[11] Institut Wohnen und Umwelt (IWU) Darmstadt; Deutsche Gebaudetypologie; Systematik und Datensatze, Dezember 2003.

[12] Statistisches Bundesamt (DeStatis) (2008): Bautatigkeit und Wohnungen, Mikrozensus – Zusatzerhebung 2006, Bestand und Struktur der Wohneinheiten, Wohnsituation der Haushalte.