OPEN ACCESS
The Paul Simon Water for the Poor Act 2005, the UN Millennium Development Goals, and Water as a Human Right are all mechanisms for enhancing access to water for the world’s poorest populations. However, these water policies are not integrated into a holistic framework. They are fragmented between multiple governing agencies, founded on competing ideologies for water management, and enforced through confusing regulatory structures for land tenure tenuously linked to water rights. Alternatively, this is the governing landscape that provides the basis for innovative approaches to water solutions: integrated water resource management (IWRM), collaborative partnerships, and adaptive management strategies focused on place-based solutions. This paper examines efforts to map the intersection of poverty and water focusing on access to water and sanitation. Webbased geospatial tools of global water access issues are reviewed. The US Paul Simon Water for the Poor Act 2005 (WfP Act), the human right to water and sanitation (General Assembly Resolution 64/292, 2010), the UN Millennium Development Goals (MDG) to improve access to water and sanitation (Goal 7), and the codifi cation of water as a human right into law by specifi c water poor countries are spatially cross-referenced to map the institutional landscape where water policy and water need intersect. Fundamental to improved access to water and sanitation is the need for a healthy environment. We conclude our research by examining the question: how well can these policies reconcile the confl icting demands upon the socio-ecological landscape?
geospatial tools, global water policy, hydro-social, millennium development goals, Paul Simon Water for the Poor Act.
[1] U.S. Senate, 109th Congress, Senator Paul Simon Water for the Poor Act of 2005, http://www. wilsoncenter.org/events/docs/WFPA%20-%20LAW.pdf
[2] Azar, E., The confl ict and peace data bank (COPDAB) project. Journal of Confl ict Resolution, 24(1), pp. 143–52, 1980.
[3] Wolf, A., The transboundary freshwater dispute database project. International Water R esources Association, 24(2), pp. 160–163, 1999.
[4] Vörösmarty, C., McIntyre, P., Gessner, M., Dudgeon, D., Prusevich, A., Green, P., Glidden, S., Bunn, S., Sullivan, C., Liermann, C. & Davies, P., Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature, 467, pp. 555–561, 2010. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09440
[5] United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (UN-CESCR), General Comment No. 15, The right to water (arts.11 and 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 2002. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/water/docs/ CESCR_GC_15.pdf
[6] Bakker, K., Privatizing Water: Governance Failure and the World’s Urban Water Crisis, Cornel University Press: London.
[7] UN – Water Global Annual Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking Water(UN-GLAAS), 2010. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/glaas/en/
[8] Hargrove, W.L., Garrity, D.P., Rhoades R.E. & Neely, C.L., A landscape/lifescape approach to sustainability in the tropics: the experience of the SANREM CRSP at three sites (Chapter 13). Integrated Watershed Management in the Global Ecosystem, ed. R. Lal, CRC Press: Boca Raton, pp. 209–222, 2000.
[9] Deutsch, W.G., Busby, A.L., Orprecio, J.L., Bago-Labis, J.P. & Cequina, E.Y., Community-based hydrological and water quality assessments in Mindanao, Philippines, (Chapter 9). Forests, Water and People in the Humid Tropics, eds. M. Bonell & L.A. Bruijnzeel, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, pp. 134–149, 2005.
[10] World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD), Plan of Implementation, 2002. http:// www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/WSSD_POI_PD/English/WSSD_PlanImpl.pdf
[11] Sachs, J. & McArthur, J.W., The millennium project: a plan for meeting the millennium development goals. Lancet, 265, pp. 347–53, 2005.
[12] Fry, L.M., Mihelcic, J.R. & Watkins, D.W., Water and nonwater-related challenges of achieving global sanitation coverage. Environmental Science & Technology, 42, pp. 4298–4304, 2008. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es7025856
[13] Sternlieb, F & M. Laituri., WaSH Indicators: measuring hydro-philanthropic quality. Journal of Contemporary Water Research and Education, 145; pp. 51–60. 2009. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1936-704X.2010.00082.x
[14] UNICEF, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Annual Report. UNICEF WASH Section Programmes: New York May 2010, 2006.
[15] SANDEC & EAWAG, Water and Sanitation in Developing Countries: Summary Report of Bellagio Expert Consultation on Environmental Sanitation in the 21st Century, 1-4 February, Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology: Switzerland. 2000.
[16] United Nations Millennium Development Goals (UN MDGs), www.un.org/milleniumgoals/environ.shtml http://www.ucowr.siu.edu/updates/145/6.pdf
[17] Sternlieb, F & Laituri, M., Tracking political climate change: US policy and the human right to water. Water Resources Management V: Transaction Ecology and Environmen, ed. C. Brebbia, 125, pp. 624–636, 2009.
[18] Laituri, M., The issue of access: an assessment guide for evaluating public participation geographic information science case studies. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association, 15, APA II:pp. 25–31, 2003. http://www.urisa.org/fi les/Laiturivol15apa2-3. pdf
[19] Laituri, M., Equity and access to GIS for marginal communities. Community Empowerment, Public Participation and Geographic Information Science, eds. W. Craig, T. Howard, & D. Weiner, Taylor and Francis: London, pp. 270–282, 2002.
[20] Ramsey, K., A call for agonism: GIS and the politics of collaboration. Environment and Planning, 40, pp. 2346–63, 2008. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a4028
[21] Ramsey, K., GIS, modeling and politics: on the tensions of collaborative decision support. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, pp. 1972–80, 2009. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jenvman.2007.08.029
[22] Jankowski, P., Towards participatory geographic information systems for community-based environmental decision making. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, pp. 1966–71, 2009. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.028
[23] Seiber, R., Public Participation geographic information systems across borders. The Canadian Geographer, 47, pp. 50–61, 2003. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1541-0064.02e12
[24] FAO., Rapid assessment study: Towards integrated planning of irrigation and drainage in Egypt. Final report, 2005. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/008/a0021e/a0021e00.pdf.
[25] Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Survey on Water Governance, (2009-2010). http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/37/39/44689618.pdf
[26] Klawitter, S. & Barghouti, I., Institutional Design and process of the Palestinian water sector: Principal stakeholder, their roles, interests and confl icts. Symposium on Sustainable Water Supply and Sanitation: Strengthening Capacity for Local Governance, September 2006, Delft, pp. 26–28, 2006.
[27] WASHCost India Team, Institutional Mapping and Analysis of WASH Services and Costs, November 2008. http://www.washcost.info/page/229
[28] Welle, K., WaterAid learning for advocacy and good practice: WaterAid water point mapping in Malawi and Tanzania. December, 2005. http://www.wateraid.org/documents/plugin_ documents/waterpointmappingmalawitanzaniaweb.pdf
[29] Sullivan, C., Vörösmarty, C., Caswell, E., Bunn, S., Cline, S., Heidecke, C., Storegard, A., Proussevitch, A., Douglas. E., Bossio. D., Günther, D., Giacomello, A., O’Regan, D. & Meigh, J., Mapping the links between water, poverty and food security. Report on the Water Indicators workshop held at the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, UK, 16-19 May, 2005.
GWSP Issues in GWS Research, No.1. GWSP IPO, Bonn. 2006. Available from www.gwsp.org.
[30] Committee on Assessment of Water Resources Research, National Research Council. Confronting the nation’s water problems: the role of research, National Academies Press: Washington D.C., 2004.
[31] Gleick, P., The human right to water. Water Policy, 1, pp. 487–503, 1998. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S1366-7017(99)00008-2
[32] Ostrom, E., Understanding Institutional Diversity, Princeton University Press: Princeton, 2005.
[33] Ostrom, E., Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge University Press: New York, 1990.
[34] Berkes, F., Cross-scale institutional linkages: Perspectives from the bottom up (Chapter 9), The Drama of the Commons. Committee on the Human Dimension of Global Change, eds. E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, P.C. Stern, S. Stovich & E.U.Weber, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Academy Press: Washington, DC, pp. 293–322, 2002.
[35] Heikkila, T., Schlager, E., Davis, M., The role of cross-scale linkages in common pool resource management: assessing interstate river compacts. Presented at Workshop on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework, School of Public Affairs: UC-Denver, 2010.
[36] Cash, D., Adger, W., Berkes, F., Garden, P., Lebel, L., Olsson, P., Pritchard, L., & Young, O., Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society, 11(2), p. 8, 2006.
[37] Alexander, L.M., Boggs,Samuel Whittemore - an Appreciation. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 48, pp. 237–243, 1958. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j. 1467-8306.1958.tb01578.x
[38] Giordano, M. & Giordano, M. & Wolf, A., The geography of water confl ict and cooperation: internal pressures and international manifestations. The Geographical Journal, 168(4), pp. 293–312, 2002. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0016-7398.2002.00057.x
[39] USAID. Annex II: Tools and Indicators. Commodities Reference Guide, 2006. http://www. usaid.gov/our_work/humanitarian_assistance/ffp/crg/annex-2.htm
[40] Niemeijer, D., Developing indicators for environmental policy: data-driven and theory-d riven approaches examined by example. Environmental Science & Policy, 5, pp. 91–103, 2002. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1462-9011(02)00026-6
[41] Esty, D.C., Levy, M., Srebotnjak T. & de Sherbinin, A., Environmental Sustainability Index: Benchmarking National Environmental Stewardship. Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy: New Haven, pp. 1–414, 2005.
[42] Lawrence, P., Meigh, J., & Sullivan, C., The water poverty index: an international comparison. Keele Economics Research Paper 19, Keele University: Staffordshire, UK, p 17, 2002.
[43] Vörösmarty, C.J., Douglas, E.M., Green, P. & Revenga, C., Geospatial indicators of emerging water stress: an application to Africa. Ambio, 34, pp. 230–236, 2005.
[44] UN Water Fact Sheet, 2010. http://www.un.org/waterforlifedecade/factsheet.html. Accessed 1 May 2011.
[45] World Health Organization and United Nations Children’s Fund Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation (JMP), Progress on Drinking Water and Sanitation: Special Focus on Sanitation. UNICEF, New York and WHO, Geneva, 2008.
[46] Senator Paul Simon Water for the Poor Act (WfP), Report to Congress, June 2010. http://www. state.gov/documents/organization/146141.pdf
[47] United Nations Offi ce of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (UN OHCHR), www.
unhchr.ch/development/poverty-02.html, OHCHR (Offi ce of the High Commissioner for Human Rights), http://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/water/contributions.htm
[48] The Right to water and Sanitation. http://www.righttowater.info/progress-so-far/national-legislation-on-the right-to water/
[49] Center on Housing Rights and Evictions (COHRE), The signifi cance of human rights in MDGbased policy making on water and sanitation: an application to Kenya, South Africa, Ghana, Sri Lanka and Laos. 2009. http://www.cohre.org/topics/water-and-sanitation.
[50] Workman, J., Heart of Dryness: How the Last Bushmen Can Help Us Endure the Coming Age of Permanent Drought, Walker Books, 2009.
[51] United Nations General Assembly, GA 10967 – General Assembly adopts resolution recognizing access to clean water, sanitation as a human right. 2010. A/64/L.63/REV.1. http://www. un.org/News/Press/docs/2010/ga10967.doc.htm; http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2010/ gal10967.doc.htm).
[52] Fadaei, H., Human rights for human environment. UN Special, UDHR 60, December 2008, http://www.unspecial.org/UNS679/t29.html. Accessed 2 May 2011.
[53] Reid, R., Thornton, P. & Kruska, R., Loss and fragmentation of habitat for pastoral people and wildlife in east Africa: concepts and issues. African Journal of Range & Forage Science, 21(3),
pp. 171–181, 2004. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2989/10220110409485849
[54] Thornton, P., Kruska, R., Henninger, N., Kristjanson, P., Reid, R., Atieno, F., Odero, A. & Ndegwa, T., Mapping poverty and livestock in the developing world, International Livestock Research Institute: Nairobi, 2002.
[55] Harvey, D., Population, resources, and the ideology of science. Economic Geography, 50(3), pp. 256–277, 1974. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/142863
[56] Swyngedouw, E., The political economy and political ecology of the hydro-social cycle. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, 142, pp. 56–60, 2009.
[57] Hoekstra, A.Y. & Chapagain, A.K. Globalization of Water: Sharing the Planet’s Freshwater Resources, Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2008.
[58] Dyson, M., Bergkamp, G. & Scanlon, J., Flow: the essential of environmental fl ows, IUCN, Water and Nature Initiative: Gland, Switzeland, 2003.
[59] Millennium Development Assessment, Chapter 7: Freshwater Ecosystem Services, 2005. http://www.maweb.org/documents/document.312.aspx.pdf.
[60] Barlow, M., Blue Planet Project: http://www.blueplanetproject.net/RightToWater/index.html. Accessed 8 May 2010, 2010.
[61] GAO, US Water and Sanitation Aid: Millions of Benfi ciaries Reported in Developing Countries, but Department of State Needs to Strengthen Strategic Approach, 2010.
[62] Keen, B., Allen, H., Water Aid. U.S. Implementation of the Senator Paul Simon Water for the Poor Act: Small Steps for a Crisis that Calls for Great Strides. 2010.
[63] World Health Organization & UNICEF (WHO), Meeting the Mdg Drinking Water and Sanitation Target: the Urban and Rural Challenge Of The Decade, WHO Press: Geneva, 2006.