OPEN ACCESS
A four-year project (SuFiQuaD) has started in 2007 to optimise the sustainability of the Belgian dwelling stock, focussing on the environmental impact, the financial cost and the qualities. The whole life cycle of representative housing types is assessed and recommendations for improvement are formulated. The environmental impact is evaluated through a life cycle assessment and is expressed in monetary terms, while a life cycle cost analysis is executed for the financial evaluation. A multi-criteria analysis is used for the quality evaluation considering aspects as for example size of rooms, available wall length for furniture and acoustical performance. For the optimisation the Pareto principle is used, searching for the highest life cycle cost reduction for the smallest investment increase and for the highest quality increase for the lowest life cycle cost increase. This paper elaborates on the developed methodology and the results of the implementation to two dwellings (results of the first phase of the research). The analysis reveals that it is feasible to obtain a large reduction in the life cycle environmental cost for only a minor extra financial investment and life cycle cost. Furthermore, fi nancial-based decisions prove to differ from environmental-based ones. For the case studies, internalisation of the environmental cost leads to an average increase in investment cost of 8%; while the maintenance cost (including cleaning and replacements) increases by 2% and the heating cost by 55%. The life cycle environmental cost is mainly determined by the heating cost, while the financial cost is above all determined by the investment and maintenance costs. Although the environmental and financial cost, or one of both, is higher for a certain option, one may choose for it because of its better quality. This is clearly shown by the inclusion of the quality aspects in the optimisation procedure.
life cycle assessment, life cycle costing, monetary valuation, multi-criteria analysis, optimisation, Pareto, quality assessment
[1] FOD economie, K.M.O., Middenstand en Energie. (2009). Statistical data Belgium, from www.statbel.fgov.be/fi gures/download_nl.asp#6 (accessed July 2009)
[2] Eurima (2010). Eurima Insulation thickness survey 2004, from www.eurima.org/insulationthickness/(accessed September 2010)
[3] Dijkmans, R., A transparent and proven methodology for selection of Best Available Techniques (BAT) at the sector level by Guided expert judgment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1, pp. 11–21, 2000. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(99)00308-X
[4] a.a. Besluit van de Vlaamse Regering van 11 maart 2005 tot vaststelling van de eisen op het vlak van de energieprestaties en het binnenklimaat van gebouwen. Brussels, Belgium: Belgisch Staatsblad, 2005a.
[5] Allacker, K., De Troyer, F., Spirinckx, C., De Nocker, L., Vercalsteren, A., Tomasetig, B. & Putzeys K. Striving for a more sustainable Belgian dwelling stock. Proceedings of the fi fth International Conference on Urban regeneration and Sustainability – The Sustainable City V. WITPress: Southamption, Boston, pp. 335–344, 2008.
[6] Barrow, C. Environmental and Social Impact Assessment: An Introduction. Arnold, Hodder Headline, PLC: London, UK, 1997.
[7] Waage, S., Geiser, K., Irwin, F., Weissman, A., Bertolucci, M., Fisk, P., Basile, G., Cowan, S., Cauley, H. & McPherson, A. Fitting together the building blocks for sustainability a revised model for integrating ecological, social and fi nancial factors into business decision-making. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, pp. 1145–1163, 2005. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2004.06.003
[8] Nijkamp, P. The role of evaluation in supporting a Human Sustainable Development: A cosmonomic perspective. Sustainable Urban Development – Volume 2: The environmental assessment methods, M. Deakin, G. Mitchell, P. Nijkamp & R. Vreeker, Routledge: Oxon, UK, pp. 94–109, 2007.
[9] Oberg, M. Integrated Life Cycle Design – Applied to Swedish concrete multi-dwelling buildings. Doctoral dissertation, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund, Sweden, pp. 9, 2005.
[10] ISO 14040. Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework. ISO, pp. 2, 2006.
[11] Guinée, J., Gorrée, M., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., Kleijn, R., de Koning, A., van Oers, L., Wegener Sleeswijk, A., Suh, S., Udo de Haes, H.A., de Bruijn, H., van Duin, R. & Huijbregts M.A.J. Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment: Operational Guide to the ISO Standards. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2002.
[12] IEA. International Energy Agency, Annex 31 Energy-Related Environmental Impact of Buildings – Assessing buildings for adaptability, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation: Canada, 2004a.
[13] IEA. International Energy Agency, Annex 31 Energy-Related Environmental Impact of Buildings – Context and Methods for Tool Designers, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation: Canada, 2004b.
[14] IEA. International Energy Agency, Annex 31 Energy-Related Environmental Impact of Buildings – Data needs and sources, Canada Mortgage and Housing Coporation: Canada: 2004c.
[15] IEA. International Energy Agency, Annex 31 Energy-Related Environmental Impact of Buildings – Environmental framework, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation: Canada 2004d.
[16] IEA. International Energy Agency, Annex 31 Energy-Related Environmental Impact of Buildings – Life Cycle Assessment Methods for Buildings, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation: Canada, 2004e.
[17] IEA. International Energy Agency, Annex 31 Energy-Related Environmental Impact of Buildings – Types of tools, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation: Canada, 2004f.
[18] SETAC. A Technical Framework for Life-Cycle Assessment, SETAC Foundation: Pensacola, US, 1991.
[19] ISO 14044. Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Requirements and Guidelines. ISO, 2006.
[20] SETAC. Life-Cycle Assessment in Building and Construction: A State-of-the-Art Report. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, SETAC Press: North Carolina, USA, 2003.
[21] REGENER. European methodology for the evaluation of Environmental impact of buildings – Life Cycle Assessment – application of the life cycle analysis to buildings, Detailed description and review, Final report of EU REGENER project. REGENER, 1997.
[22] ISO 15686-1. Buildings and Constructed Assets – Life Cycle Assessment – Requirements and Guidelines, ISO: Paris, France, 2006.
[23] Ammar, C. & Longuet, M., Belgian Requirements About Buildings Service Life. Durability of Building Materials and Components, pp. 77–90, 1980. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1520/ STP36050S
[24] BBRI. Guide pratique pour l’ Entretien des Bâtiments: BBRI: Belgium, 1991.
[25] SBR. Levensduur van bouwproducten.: Stichting BouwResearch (SBR): Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1998.
[26] NIBE. Classifi cation, Basiswerk duurzaam en gezond bouwen. De leidraad bij het realiseren van duurzame en gezonde woning- en utiliteitsbouw: Nibe Publishing bv: Bussum, The Netherlands, 2003.
[27] INIES. INventaire des Impacts Environnementaux et Sanitaires, France, from www.inies.fr (accessed March 2011), 2007.
[28] Seongwon, S. International review of environmental assessment tools and databases – report 2001-006-B-02: CRC for Construction Innovation, 2002.
[29] BRE. BREEAM: The Environmental Assessment Method for Buildings Around The World, from www.breeam.org/(accessed February 2011), 2011
[30] Peuportier, B. & Putzeys, K., PRESCO, WP2 Inter-Comparison and Benchmarking of LCABased Environmental Assessment and Design Tools – fi nal report. PRESCO, 2005.
[31] Verbeeck, G., Optimisation of Extremely Low Energy Residential Buildings. Doctoral dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, 2007.
[32] a.a. Besluit van de Vlaamse Regering van 11 maart 2005 tot vaststelling van de eisen op het vlak van de energieprestaties en het binnenklimaat van gebouwen – bijlage I. Brussels, Belgisch Staatsblad: Belgium, 2005b.
[33] VEA (2009). Vlaams Energieagentschap – energiesparen, from: www.energiesparen.be (accessed November 2009)
[34] a.a. Guide Pratique pour l’Entretien des Bâtiments. le Conseil National de l’Ordre des Architects, le Colléges des Experts Architectes de Belgique, la Confédération Nationale de la Construction (C.N.C.), la Fédération Royale des Sociétés d’Architects de Belgique (F.A.B.), SECO and CSTC, 1991a.
[35] Perret, J. Guide de la maintenance des bâtiments, Diagnostic d’un patrimoine bâti existant, prévention des désordres et actions pour y remédier, 308 fi ches tecniques de suivi des ouvrages. Paris, France: Le Moniteur, 1995.
[36] De Troyer, F. Bouweconomie en Systeembouw, ACCO: Leuven, Belgium, 2007.
[37] a.a. Cost Control in Building Design. Her Majesty’s stationery offi ce: London, UK, 1968.
[38] ecoinvent. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, from www.ecoinvent.org (accessed December 2010), 2009
[39] Goedkoop, M. & Spriensma, R. The Eco-Indicator 99 A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment – Methodology Report, Pré Consultants B.V: Amersfoort, The Netherlands, 2001
[40] Tol, R.S. The marginal damage costs of carbon dioxide emissions: an assessment of the uncertainties. Energy Policy, 33, pp. 2064–2074, 2005. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.04.002
[41] Stern, N. Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2006.
[42] Watkiss P., Downing, T.E., Anthoff, D., Butterfi eld, R., Ceronsky, M., Grubb, M., Guo, J., Hepburn, C., Hope, C., Hunt, A., Li, A., Markandya, A. Moss, S., Nyong, A. & Tol, R.S.J. Scoping Uncertainty in the Social Cost of Carbon. Final Project Report, Social Cost of Carbon: A Closer look at Uncertainty, Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: London, UK, 2005.
[43] Holland, M., Pye, S., Watkiss, P., Droste-Franke, B. & Bickel, P. Damages per tonne emission of PM2.5, NH3, SO2, NOx and VOCs from each EU25 Member State (excluding Cyprus) and surrounding seas, AEA Technology Environment: Didcon, Oxon, UK, pp. 14–18, 2005.
[44] Allacker, K. Sustainable Building: The Development of an Evaluation Method. Doctoral dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, 2010.
[45] ASPEN. ASPENINDEX – Nieuwbouw, edition 39. Antwerp, Belgium: ASPEN, 2006a.
[46] Pasman, W., Scholten, J.G. & Veldkamp, I. Burgerwerk en kleine aannemingen – onderhoud en herstel, Misset Bouw: Doetinchem, The Netherlands, 1/1993.
[47] Hollander den, T., Kuhlmann, W., Steenhuis, J. & Veldkamp, I., Woningbouwkosten – Groot onderhoud en renovatie, Misset bouw: Doetinchem, The Netherland, 3/1993.
[48] Ten Hagen Stam. Bouwkosten – Burgerwerk – Groot Onderhoud – update, Ten Hagen & Stam: Den Haag, The Netherlands, 2000a.
[49] Ten Hagen Stam. Bouwkosten – Burgerwerk – Klein Onderhoud – update, Ten Hagen & Stam: Den Haag, The Netherlands, 2000b.
[50] Ten Hagen Stam. Herstelkosten bouwgebreken 1999, Ten Hagen & Stam: Den Haag, The Netherlands, 2000c.
[51] ASPEN. ASPENINDEX – Onderhoud, ombouw, edition 39. ASPEN: Antwerp, Belgium, 2006b.
[52] European Commission. Eurostat – European statistics, from Eurostat:nui.epp.eurostat.ec. europa.eu/nui/setupModifyTableLayout.do (accessed October 2009), 2009.
[53] Dexia Bank. De spaarrekening: interessant als belegging?. Nieuwsbrief van Dexia Bank, January 2007: 1, 2007.
[54] ABEX. Associatie van Belgische Experten, from: www.abex.be. (accessed June 2009), 2009.
[55] Federaal Planbureau. Economische vooruitzichten 2007–2012. Federaal Planbureau, communiqué dd. 11 May 2007, from: www.plan.fgov.be. (accessed June 2007), 2007.
[56] D’haeseleer W., et al. Belgium’s Energy Challenges Towards 2030. Commission Energy 2030, Brussels, from: www.ce2030.be. (accessed June 2007), 2007.
[57] Weitzman, M. Just keeping discounting, but. Discounting and Intergenerational Equity, F. Weynant: Resources for the future: Washington, US, 1999.
[58] a.a. Method for the evaluation of the quality of dwellings in the design phase (translated title) – Methode voor de beoordeling van de kwaliteit van woningen in de ontwerpfase. Brussels, Belgium: Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap – bestuur Huisvesting, 1991b.
[59] Vreeker, R., Nijkamp, P. & Munda, G. Evaluation of sustainable urban development: Costbenefi t analysis and multicriteria analysis. Sustainable Urban Development – Volume 2: The environmental assessment methods, M. Deakin, G. Mitchell, P. Nijkamp, & R. Vreeker, Routledge: Oxon, UK, 141–157, 2007.
[60] Lombardi, P. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Sustainable Urban Development – Volume 2: The environmental assessment methods. M. Deakin, G. Mitchell, N.P., & R. Vreeker, Routledge: Oxon, UK, pp. 209–222. 2007.
[61] Baycan-Levent, T., Bruinsma, F. & Nijkamp, P. Urban spiders: A comparative framework for evaluation and scenario analysis. Sustainable Urban Development – Volume 2: The environmental assessment methods, M. Deakin, G. Mitchell, P. Nijkamp & R. Vreeker, Routledge: Oxon, UK, pp. 236–253, 2007.
[62] Allacker, K. & De Troyer, F. Integrated sustainability assessment of dwellings in the Belgian context. Proceedings of the 3rd CIB International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Built Environments (SASBE09). SASBE: Delft, The Netherlands, ISBN 978 90 5269373, 2009.