Economics and Remedial Processes During Brownfield Redevelopment from Theory to Practice: Examples from the Czech Republic

Economics and Remedial Processes During Brownfield Redevelopment from Theory to Practice: Examples from the Czech Republic

S. Ciháková Aguilar M. Cerníková 

Institute of Novel Technologies and Applied Informatics, Technical University in Liberec, Czech Republic

Faculty of Economics, Technical University of Liberec, Czech Republic

| |
| | Citation



Since the end of the 1980s, the Czech Republic has faced difficult times in the area of improvement of the living environment. The former socialistic regime originated some of the worst environmental indicators in Europe. Although the state of the environment in the Czech Republic has improved, it is still necessary to ensure a good quality in some particular areas. One of them is the management of depressed areas (Brownfields). The scope of this work is to describe how various schools of economics focus their study on environmental problems, specifically on Brownfield redevelopment. After an introductory part with definitions and a general framework, the paper presents the ideas of environmental economics, free market environmentalism, institutional economics, and ecological economics. Each part is complemented by an overview of empirical research on the field of historical contamination. The last part shows two particular cases in the Czech Republic, where the ecological economics approach has been applied for the assessment of economic effectiveness of remedial processes.


Brownfields, cost-effectiveness, ecological economics, economic theory, environmental economics


[1] Zizka, M.. Rydvalova A.P., Ekonomické souvislosti revitalizace Brownfi elds. 1. vyd. Praha: nakladatelství Oeconomica, ro . 54, . 5, s. pp. 632–645, 2006.

[2] Pigou, A.C. , The Economics of Welfare, London: Macmillan, p. 976, 1920.

[3] Sauer P.Ek onomické souvislosti ešení ekologických d sledk pobytu sovetských vojsk na našem území, Acta Oeconomica Pragensia,  .2/1993.

[4] Hajek, F., The Fatal Conce it: The Errors of Socialism. Routledge: London, pp. 194, 1989. ISBN 978-0226320663.

[5] Shawn, J.S., Not Quite A  Gentleman. The Environmental Forum. The Environmental Law Institute, Washington, D.C. 2003. ISSN 0731-5732.

[6] Stroup, R. & Townsend B., EPA’s New Superfund Rule: Making the Problem Worse. Regulation: The Cato Review of Business & Government, Washington, D.C., 3, 1993.

[7] Mailman, R., Cleaning Up  Its Act: Improving CERCLA Effi ciency within the Bankruptcy Code. 27 Whittier Law Review. Whittier CA, 27(2), pp. 557–596, 2005. ISSN 0195-7643.

[8] Nugent, S., Mushrooms Meet  Brownfi elds. A Market for Fungal Remediation. PERC Reports. 24(4). Washington DC 2006. Online

[9] Coase, R., The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics, III, pp. 1–44, 1960. ISSN 00222186.

[10] Coase, R., The nature of  the fi rm. Economica, IV, pp. 386–405, 1937.1920. ISSN 0013-0427.

[11] Paavola J. & Adger N., New  Institutional Economics and the Environment: Conceptual Foundations and Policy Implications. CSERGE Working Paper. University of East Anglia, Norwich 

2002. Online

[12] Williams, K. & Dair C., F ive barriers to sustainable Brownfi eld development. Town and Country Planning, 72(11), pp. 344–345, 2003. ISSN 0040-9960.

[13] Meyer, K. & Estrin, S., B rownfi eld entry in emerging markets. Journal of International Business Studies. Palgrave. Hampshire, 32(3), pp. 575–584, 2001. ISSN 0047-2506.

[14] Costanza, R., Cumberland J ., Daly H., Goodland R. & Norgaard R., An Introduction to Ecological Economic (Hardcover) CRC Press. Boca Raton: Florida, p. 275, 1997.

[15] Nijkamp, P. & Rodenburg,  A., Success factors for sustainable urban brownfi eld development: A comparative case study approach to polluted sites. Ecological Economics, 40, pp. 235–252, 2002. ISSN 0921-8009.

[16] Geoghegan, J., Wainger, L . & Bockstael , N., Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework: 

an ecological economics analysis using GIS. Ecological Economics, 23(3), pp. 251–264, 1997. ISSN 0921-8009.

[17] Mateju,V. & kol, A., Komp endium sana ních technologií. Vodní zdroje Ekomonitor, s.r.o. Chrudim, 2006. ISBN 80-86832-15-5.

[18] Drechsmann, P.,:Anforderungen a n eine Sanierungsuntersuchungunter Berücksichtigung von Nutzen-Kosten-Aspekten, Im Auftrag des Landesumweltamtes Nordrhein-Westfalen, Essen 2000[online]. 2009. [cit 2010-11-10]. URL: < malbo/malbo11_web.pdf>

[19] Internal materials Company A, 2009.

[20] Kvapil, P. & kol, A, Technicko- ekonomická studie mraku Internal materials Aquatest, 5, 2009.

[21] Cihakova Aguilar, S., Cernikova, M . & Dubova, M., Historical contamination and brownfi eld management: what does economic theory say about it? Ecosystems and Sustainable Development VIII. WIT Press. Southampton, pp. 239–252, 2011. ISBN 978-1-84564-510-6.

[22] Cihakova Aguilar, S., Decision mak ing and brownfi eld management. Ekonomie a Management E+M. 3/2009, pp. 19–33. ISSN 1212-3609.