Community Development in the East Prefecture of Attica, Greece, Following the 2004 Summer Olympic Games of Athens

Community Development in the East Prefecture of Attica, Greece, Following the 2004 Summer Olympic Games of Athens

H. Theodoropoulou M. Vamvakari R. Mitoula

Department Home Economics & Ecology, Harokopio University of Athens, Greece

Page: 
112-122
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V5-N1-112-122
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

The present study examined how community development has been affected by social and economic changes in four specific semi rural areas which are located in the east prefecture of Attica in Greece. These semi rural areas are affected significantly by social and economic changes, because of substantial new infrastructure development that took place in relation to the 2004 Summer Olympic Games of Athens. The aim of this study was to examine local entrepreneurship as well as local social and economic development in the study areas. Sample data were collected on the characteristics of residents and local enterprises and land use changes in these four areas of Attica. On the basis of these data a profi le of the residents and the characteristics of land use and local enterprises were constructed. The results of the study showed that there has been a substantial population increase and real estate construction. Also, residential land has increased at the expense of farmland. Furthermore, new enterprises are founded through private investments, which increase local entrepreneurship. Using cross-tabulation statistical methods it was found that the educational level of the responders is positively related with the occupation satisfaction (P = 0.0345). Also, the more an area was developed the more pharmacies existed in the specifi c area (P = 0.0437) and the closest an area was from the sea the more tourist character it had (P = 0.0000). In addition, the analysis of the logistic regression models showed that as private investment and urban planning increase local development increases, while as population density increases local development decreases (R = 81.2%). Furthermore, the more social services exist in a community such as help at home, shelter for elderly and there are more chances for employment then local sustainable development is increased In addition, as the number of homeless people increases local sustainable development decreases. (R = 80.2%). Also, Kruskal–Wallis H - tests were performed for the comparison of the four areas concerning demographical and residential elements as well as development elements, which showed that the opinion of the respondents from all four areas is similar as regards quality of life and job satisfaction at a = 1% significance level.

Keywords: 

community, development, enterprises, local, sustainable

  References

[1] Young, F., Reactive subsystems. American Sociological Review, 35, pp. 297–307, 1971.

[2] Munroe, D.K., Croissant, C. & York, A.M., Land use policy and landscape fragmentation in an urbanizing region: assessing the impact of zoning. Applied Geography, 25, pp. 121–141, 2005.

[3] Vias, A.C., Mulligan, G.F. & Molin, A., Economic structure and socioeconomic change in America’s micropolitan areas, 1970–1997. The Social Science Journal, 39, pp. 399–417, 2002.

[4] Theodoropoulos, H., Review of rural/urban problem from an interdisciplinary perspective. Mediterranean perspectives and proposals. Journal of Economics, Agriculture and Environment. MEDIT, 3, pp. 24–32, 1999.

[5] MacCannell, D., Series Guide to “The Tourist”, BBC Publications: London, 1995.

[6] Cano, C.R., Carrillat, F.A. & Jaramillo, F., A meta-analysis of the relationship between market orientation and business performance: evidence from fi ve continents. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, pp. 179–200, 2004.

[7] Fromard, F., Vega, C. & Proisy, C., Half a century of dynamic coastal change affecting mangrove shorelines of French Guiana. A case study based on remote sensing data analyses and fi eld surveys. Marine Geology, 208, pp. 265–280, 2004.

[8] Rodriguez, L.C. & Pascual, U., Land clearance and social capital in mountain agro-ecosystems: 

the case of Opuntia scrubland in Ayacucho, Peru. Ecological Economics, 49, pp. 243–252, 2004.

[9] Crecente, R., Alvarez, C. & Fra, U., Economic, social and environmental impact of land consolidation in Galicia. Land Use Policy, 19, pp. 135–147, 2002.

[10] De Sousa, C.A., Turning brownfi elds into green space in the city of Toronto. Landscape & Urban Planning, 948, pp. 1–18, 2002.

[11] Jo, J.C. & Adler, S., North Korean planning, urban changes and regional balance. Cities, 19(3), pp. 205–215, 2002.

[12] Williamson, I.P., Land administration “best practice” providing the infrastructure for land policy implementation. Land Use Policy, 18, pp. 297–307, 2001.

[13] Gar-on Yeh, A. & Wu, F., The transformation of the urban planning system in China from a centrally-planned to transitional economy. Progress in Planning, 51(3), pp. 167–252, 1999.

[14] Owusu, F., Pragmatism and the gradual shift from dependency to neoliberalism: the World Bank, African leaders and development policy in Africa. World Development, 31(10), pp. 1655–1672, 2003.

[15] Skinner, M.W., Joseph, A.E. & Kuhn, R.G., Social and environmental regulation in rural China: bringing the changing role of local government into focus. Geoforum, 34, pp. 267–281, 2003.

[16] Gatrell, J.D. & Jensen, R.R., Growth through greening: developing and assessing alternative economic development programmes. Applied Geography, 22, pp. 331–350, 2002.

[17] Kennedy, J.J., Thomas, J.W. & Glueck, P., Evolving forestry and rural development beliefs at midpoint and close of the 20th century. Forest Policy and Economics, 3, pp. 81–95, 2001.

[18] Firman, T., The restructuring of Jakarta metropolitan area: a “global city” in Asia. Cities, 15(4), pp. 229–243, 1998.

[19] Nghi, D.Q. & Kammeier, H.D., Balancing data integration needs in urban planning, a model for Ha Noi City, Viet Nam. Cities, 18(2), pp. 61–75, 2001.

[20] Zhang, B., Assessing the WTO agreements on China’s telecommunications regulatory reform and industrial liberalization. Telecommunications Policy, 25, pp. 461–483, 2001.

[21] Haines, A. Informed choices for attaining the millennium development goals: towards an international cooperative agenda for health-systems research. Lancet, Public Health, 364, pp. 997–1003, 2004.

[22] Huot, I., Paradis, G. & Ledoux, M., Effects of the Quebec Heart Health Demonstration Project on adult dietary behaviours. Preventive Medicine, 38, pp. 137–148, 2004.

[23] Deng, F.F. & Huang, Y., Uneven land reform and urban sprawl in China: the case of Beijing. Progress in Planning, 61, pp. 211–236, 2004.

[24] Smith, D.J., Patronage, Per diems and the “workshop mentality”: the practice of family planning programs in southeastern Nigeria. World Development, 31(4), pp. 703–715, 2003.

[25] Shiffman, J., The construction of community participation: village family planning groups and the Indonesian state. Social Science & Medicine, 54, pp. 1199–1214, 2002.

[26] Shiffman, J., Skrabalo, M. & Subotic, J., Reproductive rights and the state in Serbia and Croatia. Social Science & Medicine, 54, pp. 625–642, 2002.

[27] Pobutsky, A.M., Economics and fertility: changing family structure among Chamorros on the Island of Guam. History of the Family, 6, pp. 95–123, 2001.

[28] Midgley, J.L., Shucksmith, D.M., Birnie, R.V., Geddes, A., Bayfi eld, N. & Elston, D., Rural development policy and community data needs in Scotland. Land Use Policy, 22(2), pp. 163–174, 2005.

[29] Simon, C.J. & Nardinelli, C., Human capital and the rise of American cities, 1900–1990. 

Regional Science & Urban Economics, 32, pp. 59–96, 2002.

[30] Simon, C.J., Human capital and metropolitan employment growth. Journal of Urban Economics, 43, pp. 223–243, 1998.

[31] Azari, R. & Pick, J.B., Technology and society: socioeconomic infl uences on technological sectors for United States countries. International Journal of Information Management, 25, pp. 21–37, 2005.

[32] Berdeguè, J.A., Ramirez, E., Reardon, T. & Escobar, G., Rural nonfarm employment and incomes in Chile. World Development, 29(3), pp. 411–425, 2001.

[33] May, R., Rex, K., Bellini, L., Sadullah, S., Nishi, E., James, F. & Mathangani, A., UN habitat indicators database: evaluation as a source of the status of urban development problems and programs. Cities, 17(3), pp. 237–244, 2000.

[34] Blassingame, L., Sustainable cities: oxymoron, utopia, or inevitability? The Social Science Journal, 35, pp. 1–13, 1998.

[35] AtKisson, A., Developing indicators of sustainable community: lessons from sustainable Seattle. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16, pp. 337–350, 1996.

[36] Burnette, J., Testing for occupational crowding in eighteenth-century, British agriculture. Explorations in Economic History, 33, pp. 319–345, 1996.

[37] European Commission, Sustainable Development in the Urban Union: Action Plan, Brussels, 1998.

[38] European Commission, The Structural Funds and the Coordination Thereof with the Cohesion Fund – Plan of Directives for the Programmes 2000–2006, Brussels, 1999.

[39] Mitoula R., Sustainable Regional Development in E.U. & Reshaping of Greek Urban Environment, STAMOULI: Athens, 2006.

[40] Seabrooke, W., Yeung, S.C.W., Ma, F.M.F. & Li, Y., Implementing sustainable urban development at the operational level (with special reference to Hong Kong and Guangzhou). Habitat International, 28, pp. 443–466, 2004.