Recovery from Natural and Man-made Disasters As Capabilities Restoration and Enhancement

Recovery from Natural and Man-made Disasters As Capabilities Restoration and Enhancement

P. Gardoni C. Murphy 

Zachry Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University, USA

Department of Philosophy, Texas A&M University, USA

Page: 
317-333
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V3-N4-317-333
Received: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Published: 
31 December 2008
| Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

In the literature on the recovery of societies from natural disasters, a dominant theme is the importance of pursuing and achieving sustainable recovery. Sustainability implies that recovery efforts should aim to (re-) build, maintain, and, if possible, enhance the quality of life of members of the disaster-stricken community in the short and long term. In this paper, we propose a capabilities-based approach to recovery and argue that it provides important theoretical resources for better realizing this ideal of sustainability in practice. From a capabilities-based approach, the societal impact of a disaster is measured in terms of its impact on selected capabilities of individuals within society. Capabilities are constitutive elements of well-being and capture the valuable doings and beings individuals can achieve or become (e.g., being adequately nourished, and being sheltered). A proposed Disaster Impact Index (DII), we argue, can capture the societal impact of a disaster by measuring its impact on the well-being of individuals, as gauged by the changes in individuals’ capabilities. We discuss how to measure this impact in practice. Also, a proposed Disaster Recovery Index (DRI) measures the current level of individuals’ capabilities. It can provide important information on the degree to which capabilities have been restored and enhanced by comparing the DRI against a benchmark, or level of capabilities attainment, toward which recovery processes should strive. We argue that the DII and DRI provide critical information for policy- and decision-makers to use in order to practically implement the principles of sustainable recovery. Both can be used in the process of predisaster planning for recovery and in the period of recovery itself.

Keywords: 

capabilities, man-made disasters, natural disasters, sustainable recovery

  References

[1] United States Department of Commerce, Hurricane Katrina Service Assessment Report, Retrieved on 2006-07-14, 2006.

[2] Sheikh, P.A., The Impact of Hurricane Katrina on Biological Resources, Congressional Research Service, Retrieved on 2006-06-05, 2006.

[3] Burton, M.L. & Hicks, M.J., Hurricane Katrina: Preliminary Estimates of Commercial and Public Sector Damages, Marshall University: Center for Business and Economic Research. Retrieved on 2006-06-05, 2005.

[4] St. Onge, J. & Epstein, V., Ex-chief says FEMA Readiness Even Worse. Boston.com, Retrieved on 2006-06-05, April 1, 2006.

[5] Berke, P.R., Karetz, J. & Wenger, D., Recovery after disaster: achieving sustainable development, mitigation, and equity. Disasters, 17(2), pp. 93–109, 1993.

[6] Quarantelli, E.L., The Disaster Recovery Process: What we Know and Do Not Know From Research, Preliminary Paper #286, University of Delaware Disaster Research Center, 1999.

[7] Mileti, D.S., Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States, Joseph Henry Press: Washington, D.C., 1999.

[8] Haddow, G.D. & Bullock, J.A., Introduction to Emergency Management, Butterworth- Heinemann, p. 95, 2003.

[9] Fothergill, A., Maestas, E.G.M. & Darlington, J.D., Race, ethnicity and disasters in the United States: a review of the literature. Disasters, 23(2), pp. 156–173, 1999.

[10] Petterson, J., A Review of the Literature and Programs on Local Recovery from Disaster, Working Paper #102, Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, www.riskinstitute.org, 1999.

[11] Dahlhamer, J. & D’Souza, M., Determinants of business disaster preparedness. International Journal of Mass Emergency and Disasters 15, pp. 265–281, 1997.

[12] Tierney, K., What are the likely categories of loss and damage? The Economic Consequences of a Catastrophic Earthquake: Proceedings of a Forum, National Academy Press: Washington, D.C., pp. 77–82, 1992.

[13] Tierney, K., Societal impacts. The Northridge, California Earthquake of January 17, 1994: General Reconnaissance Report, ed. J. Goltz, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research: Buffalo, NY, pp. 7:1–7:10, 1994.

[14] Nigg, J., Anticipated business disruption effects due to earthquake-induced lifeline interruptions. Post-Earthquake Rehabilitation and Reconstruction, eds F. Cheng & Y. Wang, Pergamon, pp. 47–57, 1996.

[15] Miller, K. & Nigg, J.M., Event and consequence vulnerability: effects on the disaster recovery process, http://www.udel.edu/DRC/preliminary/217.pdf Retrieved on 2007-07-26, 1993. 

[16] Oliver-Smith, A., Success and failure in post-disaster settlement, Disasters, 15, pp. 12–24, 1991.

[17] Boyce, J.K., Let them eat risk? Wealth, rights and disaster vulnerability, Disaster, 24(3), pp. 254–261, 2000.

[18] McEntire, D.A., Correspondence, Disasters, 24(1), pp. 78–79, 1999.

[19] Bolton, P.A., Liebow, E.B. & Olson, J.L., Community context and uncertainty following a damaging earthquake: low-income Latinos and Los Angeles, California. The Environmental Professional, 15, pp. 240–247, 1993.

[20] Cooper, F. & Laughy, L., Managing hazards in a changing multinational world, unpublished paper, 1994.

[21] Bolin, R. & Bolton, P.A., Race, Religion, and Ethnicity in Disaster Recovery, Monograph No. 42, Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado: Boulder, CO, 1986.

[22] Peacock, W.G., Killian, C.D. & Bates, F.L., The effects of disaster damage and housing aid on household recovery following the 1976 Guatemalan earthquake. The International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 5(1), pp. 63–88, 1987.

[23] World Health Organization, Gender, Women, and Health, http://www.searo.who.int/en/Section13/Section390_8282.htm (accessed on June 12, 2008).

[24] Peacock, W., Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Gender, and the Sociology of Disasters, Routledge: London, 1997.

[25] World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press: New York, 1987.

[26] Monday, J.L., Building back better: creating a sustainable community after disaster. Natural Hazard Informer, 3, pp. 1–11, 2002.

[27] Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, University of Colorado, Holistic Disaster Recovery: Ideas for Building Local Sustainability after a Natural Disaster, Public Entity Risk Institute (PERI): Fairfax, VA, 2006.

[28] Wu, J.Y. & Lindell, M.K., Housing reconstruction after two major earthquakes: the 1994 Northridge earthquake in the United States and the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan. Disasters 28(1), pp. 63–81, 2004.

[29] Alexander, D., Principles of Emergency Planning and Management. Oxford University Press: New York, 2002.

[30] Peacock, W.G. & Girard, C., Ethnic and racial inequalities in hurricane damage and insurance settlements. Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Gender and the Sociology of Disasters, eds W.G. Peacock, B.H. Morrow & H. Gladwin, Routledge: London, pp. 171–190, 1997.

[31] Barnes, J.C., A Guide to Business Continuity Planning. Wiley: West Sussex, UK, 2001.

[32] Bell, J.K., Disaster Survival Planning: A Practical Guide for Businesses, Disaster Survival Planning, 1991.

[33] Goodin, R., The sustainability ethic: political, not just moral, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 16(3), pp. 247–254, 1999.

[34] Anderson, M.B. & Woodrow, P.J., Rising from the Ashes: Development Strategies in Times of Disaster, Westview Press: Boulder, CO, 1989.

[35] Berke, P. & Beatley, T., After the Hurricane: Linking Recovery to Sustainable Development, John Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, 1997.

[36] Pearce, L., Disaster management and community planning, and public participation: how to achieve sustainable hazard mitigation” Natural Hazards, 28, pp. 211–228, 2003.

[37] Berke, P., Natural-hazard reduction and sustainable development: a global assessment. Journal of Planning Literature, 9(4), pp. 370–382, 1995.

[38] Sen, A., Development as capabilities expansion. Journal of Development Planning, 19, pp. 41–58, 1989.

[39] Sen, A., Capability and well-being. The Quality of Life, eds M. Nussbaum & A. Sen, Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, pp. 30–53, 1993.

[40] Sen, A., Development as Freedom, Anchor Books: New York, 1999.

[41] Sen, A., Commodities and Capabilities, Oxford University Press: New York, 1999.

[42] Sen, A., Elements of a theory of human rights. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 32(4), pp. 315–356, 2004.

[43] Nussbaum, M., Woman and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2001.

[44] Nussbaum, M., Aristotle, politics, and human capabilities: a response to Antony, Arneson, Charlesworth, and Mulgan. Ethics, 111(1), pp. 102–140, 2000.

[45] Anand, S. & Sen, A., The income component of the Human Development Index. Journal of Human Development, 1(1), pp. 83–106, 2000.

[46] Berges, S., Why the capability approach is justifi ed. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 24(1), pp. 16–25, 2007.

[47] Raworth, K. & Stewart, D., Critiques of the Human Development Index: a review. S. Fukuda-Parr & A.K. Shiva Kumar Readings in Human Development, eds S. Fukuda-Parr & A.K. Shiva Kumar, Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, pp. 140–152, 2003.

[48] United Nation Development Program, Human Development Report website, http://hdr.undp.org/ Retrieved on 2007-07-26, 2007.

[49] Murphy, C. & Gardoni, P., The role of society in engineering risk analysis: a capabilities-based approach. Risk Analysis, 26(4), pp. 1085–1095, 2006.

[50] Gardoni, P. & Murphy, C., A capabilities-based approach to measuring the societal impacts of natural and man-made hazards. Natural Hazard Review, 2006 (submitted).

[51] Murphy, C. & Gardoni, P., Determining public policy and resource allocation priorities for mitigating natural hazards: a capabilities-based approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13(4), pp. 489–504, 2007.

[52] Murphy, C. & Gardoni, P., The acceptability and the tolerability of societal risks: a capabilitiesbased approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(1), pp. 77–92, 2007.