Performance Analysis of the Greek Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Companies – Proposal of an Evaluation Methodology

Performance Analysis of the Greek Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Companies – Proposal of an Evaluation Methodology

K.G. Aravossis N.A. Panayiotou K. Tsousi 

Section of Industrial Management & Operational Research, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Greece

EFG Eurobank Ergasias S.A., Greece

30 June 2008
| Citation



This paper examines the adoption of corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices and looks at CSR reports of many companies across different industries in Greece. The CSR disclosures are further classified and the results are analysed and interpreted. A proposed methodological framework is suggested, which can be followed by the companies to implement an effective CSR programme in all the areas of their operation consisting of three distinct stages: Analysis, Execution and Performance Evaluation. The suggested framework permits the development of corporate CSR programmes adapted to the unique characteristics of each sector and company, emphasising different stages according to organisational activities, missions and the resources that can be utilised. The framework includes weighted performance indicators relating to a company’s impact on different areas of activity such as environment, community, human capital, shareholders and marketplace. The application of the proposed methodological framework is demonstrated in two companies, an industrial one and a financial one.


case study, corporate social responsibility, performance evaluation


[1] Buchholz, R.A., Essentials of Public Policy for Management, 2nd edn, Prentice-Hall: Saddle River, NJ, 1990.

[2] Robbins, S. & Decenzo, D., Fundamentals of Management, 3rd edn, Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2001.

[3] Papasolomou-Doukakis, I., Krambia-Kaprdis, M. & Katsioloudes, M., Corporate social responsibility: the way forward? Maybe not! A preliminary study in Cyprus. European Business Review, 17(3), pp. 263–279, 2005.

[4] World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Corporate Social Responsibility, WBCSD: Geneva, Switzerland, 1999.

[5] Carroll, A.B., A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, pp. 497–505, 1979.

[6] Carroll, A.B., The four faces of corporate citizenship. Business Ethics 00/01, ed. J.E. Richardson, Dushkin/McGraw-Hill: Guilford, CT, pp. 187–191, 2000.

[7] Lantos, G.P., The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), pp. 595–632, 2001.

[8] Lantos, G.P., The ethicality of altruistic corporate social responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 19(3), pp. 205–32, 2002.

[9] Idowu, S.O. & Towler, B.A., A comparative study of the contents of corporate social responsibility reports of UK companies. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 15(4), pp. 420–437, 2004.

[10] Cooper, B., Corporate social responsibility: the Holy Grail? Chartered Secretary, 30 June, pp. 12–16, 2003.

[11] Moir, L., What do we mean by corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance, 1(2), pp. 16–22, 2001.

[12] Wartick, S.L. & Cochran, P.L., The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 10, pp. 758–769, 1985.

[13] Wood, D.J., Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, pp. 691–718, 1991. 

[14] Preston, L.E. & Post, J.E., Private Management and Public Policy: The Principle of Public Responsibility, Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1975.