Newarchitecturestransformingthe Urban Landscape

Newarchitecturestransformingthe Urban Landscape

R. Papageorgiou-Sefertzi

School of Architecture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.

Page: 
167-183
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V2-N2-167-183
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

In this digital epoch and information society, current thinking and research in architecture seems to be significantly transformed. The digital means and digital architecture reveal not only a different way of representation but also a different way of thinking, generating and materializing space and form. These new concepts, techniques and processes of design break the existing codes of modern architecture and introduce new ones. In the search for a unifying architectural discourse, this article examines three aspects of recent and current projects, which overturn previous morphology. Namely: topography, i.e. the relationship between a building and its site, the surfaces, i.e. the visible skin of the buildings, and hyper-projects, i.e. hybrid mega structures that mix private and public urban life. In terms of topography, the surface of the earth seems to move and extend itself in complex curvatures through buildings. These complex geometries, borrowed from physics, supersede the customary distinction between object (building) and site. As far as surfaces are concerned, the old dialectics between supports and weights are abandoned for continuous surfaces that are folded, curved or layered. Finally, recent hyper-projects form a kind of paradigm of the metropolis itself, superseding the old distinction between private and public space. These architectural metamorphoses point to a new paradigm shift.

Keywords: 

digital architecture, flow, folds, hyper-projects, organic, smooth, surfaces, topography.

  References

[1] Beriatos, E. & Gospodini, A., ‘Glocalising’ urban landscapes: Athens and the 2004 Olympics. Cities, 21(3), p. 189, 2004.

[2] Schittich, C., Between fashionable packaging and responsive skin: trends in modern façade design. Detail, 7/8, pp. 754–760, 2003.

[3] Forster, K., Topography. Metamorph – 9th International Architecture Exhibition, Trajectories, Venice Biennale, Rizzoli: New York, p. 141, 2004

[4] Eisenman, P., Ciudad de la Cultura de Galicia, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. Metamorph – 9th International Architecture Exhibition, Trajectories, Venice Biennale, Rizzoli: New York, p. 185, 2004.

[5] Andrew, P., National Grand Theatre of China, Beijing. Metamorph – 9th International Architecture Exhibition, Trajectories, Venice Biennale, Rizzoli: New York, p. 61, 2004.

[6] Guallart, V., Artificial mountain for a multifunctional centre, Denia, Spain. Metamorph – 9th InternationalArchitecture Exhibition,Trajectories,Venice Biennale, Rizzoli: NewYork, p. 163, 2004.

[7] Nouvel, J., Guggenheim Competition Project, Tokyo, Japan. Metamorph – 9th International Architecture Exhibition, Trajectories, Venice Biennale, Rizzoli: New York, p. 182, 2004.

[8] Forster, K., Surfaces. Metamorph – 9th International Architecture Exhibition, Trajectories, Venice Biennale, Rizzoli: New York, p. 225, 2004.

[9] Lupton, E., Skin: new design organics. Skin, ed. E. Lupton, PrincetonArchitectural Press: New York, pp. 29–41, 2002.

[10] Imperiale,A., Digital skins: the architecture of surface. Skin, ed. E Lupton, PrincetonArchitectural Press: New York, pp. 55–63, 2002.

[11] NOX (Lars Spuybroek & Kas Oosterhuis), Son-O-House, Son en Breugel, The Netherlands. Metamorph – 9th International Architecture Exhibition, Trajectories, Venice Biennale, Rizzoli: New York, p. 72, 2004.

[12] Xefirotarch (Herman Diaz Alonso), Pusan metropolitan city, Korea, international architectural competition. Metamorph – 9th InternationalArchitecture Exhibition,Trajectories,Venice Biennale, Rizzoli: New York, p. 73, 2004.

[13] Rosa,J.,NextGenerationArchitecture:ContemporaryDigitalExperimentationandtheRadical Avant-Garde, Thames and Hudson: London, 2003.

[14] Diller, E. & Scofidio, R., Eyebeam Museum of Art and Technology. Metamorph – 9th International Architecture Exhibition, Trajectories, Venice Biennale, Rizzoli: New York, p. 262, 2004.

[15] Hadid, Z., The Centre of Contemporary Arts, Rome. http://www.designboom.com/portrait/ zaha_r.html.

[16] Gausa, M., Blobs. The Metapolis Dictionary of Advanced Architecture: City, Technology and Society in the Information Age, ACTAR: Barcelona, p. 84, 2003

[17] NOX, Wood EXPO, Zeeland, The Netherlands. Metamorph – 9th International Architecture Exhibition, Trajectories, Venice Biennale, Rizzoli: New York, p. 257, 2004.

[18] Gehry, F., Walt Disney Concert Hall, LosAngeles. Metamorph – 9th International Architecture Exhibition, Trajectories, Venice Biennale, Rizzoli: New York, pp. 76–77, 2004.

[19] Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, Jinling Tower, Nanjing, China. Metamorph – 9th International Architecture Exhibition, Trajectories, Venice Biennale, Rizzoli: New York, p. 247, 2004.

[20] Forster, K., Hyper-projects. Metamorph – 9th International Architecture Exhibition, Trajectories, Venice Biennale, Rizzoli: New York, p. 341, 2004.

[21] Eisenman, P., Max Reinhardt Haus, Berlin. Metamorph – 9th International Architecture Exhibition, Trajectories, Venice Biennale, Rizzoli: New York, p. 252, 2004.

[22] Moussavi, F. & Zaera, A., Complexity and consistency. El Croquis, 115/116, p. 31, 2003.

[23] UNStudio-VanBerkel&Bos.,Urbanmasterplan,stationareaArnhemCentral,TheNetherlands.

Metamorph – 9th International Architecture Exhibition, Trajectories, Venice Biennale, Rizzoli: New York, p. 349, 2004.

[24] Himmelblau, C., Musee des Confluences, Lyon, France. Metamorph – 9th International Architecture Exhibition, Trajectories, Venice Biennale, Rizzoli: New York, p. 247, 2004.

[25] Papadopoulos, L., The diagram. Digital Topographies, ed. S. Papadimitriou, Futura Publications: Athens, p. 24, 2005.

[26] Deleuse, G., The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque, Minnesota University Press: Minneapolis, MN, 1993.

[27] Spiller, N., Architectural futures. Digital Topographies, ed. S. Papadimitriou, Futura Publications: Athens, pp. 33–34, 2005.