Regenerating Places Sustainably: The Healthy Urban Design

Regenerating Places Sustainably: The Healthy Urban Design

Marichela Sepe

IRISS National Research Council–DIARC, University of Naples Federico II, Italy

Page: 
14-27
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V15-N1-14-27
Received: 
N/A
|
Revised: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Available online: 
N/A
| Citation

© 2020 IIETA. This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Current needs of people are continuously changing due to the rapid transformation of territories, which present more and more social, virtual, environmental and urban infrastructures, which are intersected and overlapped in different and not always sustainable manner. However, some points seem to be important for the well-being of people and sustainability of places. For these reasons, the needs of more healthy, happy and liveable places are increasing, and the studies on these fields are becoming always more important to identify both the intangible and tangible aspects capable of giving a scientific point of view on the above topics. If from a part many indexes have been created, from the other these change continuously and are created with different parameters, which can sometimes give rise to a non-univocal interpretation. Furthermore, many studies are focused only on one aspect capable of giving health, happiness and liveability and do not consider the intangible aspects suitably. The most happiest city or the most liveable place or, again, the city which is considered the healthiest are data which are more and more used to increase attractiveness and competitiveness to an area of transformation or a whole city. The use of a correct method to collect and use these data suitably is currently a need to obtain a sustainability meant in the threefold meaning, namely, social, environmental and economic one. Starting from these premises, the aim of this study is to present the main research on these topics and illustrate the original Ecoliv@ble+ design method, which was created in order to identify urban health, liveability and happiness from the users’ point of view and identify sustainable design interventions to enhance or create these factors. The emblematic case of False Creek area in Vancouver, British Columbia, interested by a long process of urban regeneration, and relative observation on the method conclude the article.

Keywords: 

liveability, place identity, public space, sustainable urban regeneration, urban design, urban happiness, urban health.

  References

[1] Sepe, M., Liveable and healthy city design. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 217, eds. C.A. Brebbia, N. Marchetini & G. Passerini, WIT Press, 2018, ISSN 1743-3541.

[2] Sepe, M., The role of public space to achieve urban happiness. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 2(4), pp. 724–733, 2017. https://doi. org/10.2495/sdp-v12-n4-724-733

[3] Friedmann, J. & Douglass, M., Cities For Citizens: Planning and the Rise of Civil Society in a Global Age, Chichester, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1998.

[4] Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T. & Tiesdell, S., Public Places-Urban Spaces, Architectural Press: Oxford, 2010.

[5] Project for Public Spaces, How to Turn a Place Around: A Handbook for Creating Successful Public Spaces, Project for Public Places: New York City, NY, 2001.

[6] Sepe, M., Planning and place in the city. Mapping Place Identity, Routlege: London, New York, 2013.

[7] Lynch, K., The Image of the City, Mit Press: Cambridge, 1960.

[8] Appleyard, D., Liveable Streets, University of California Press: Berkeley, 1981.

[9] Montgomery, J., Making a city: urbanity, vitality and urban Design. Journal of Urban Design, 3, pp. 93–116, 1998.

[10] Porteous, J.D., Environmental and Behavior: Planning and Everyday Urban Life, Addison-Wesley: Massachusetts, 1977.

[11] Gehl, J., Cities for People, Island Press: Washington, 2010.

[12] Sepe, M., Preserving, reconstructing and enhancing the place identity: identifying principles of urban sustainability with PlaceMaker method. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 9(2), pp. 277–300, 2014. https://doi. org/10.2495/sdp-v9-n2-277-300

[13] Zelinka, A. & Brennan, D., Safescape, Creating Safer, More Livable Communities Though Planning and Design, Planner Press APA: Chicago, 2001.

[14] Florida R., Mellander C. & Rentfrow, P.J., The happiness of cities. Regional Studies, 47(4), pp. 613–627, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.589830

[15] Saunders, L., Healthy cities. Urban Design Group Journal, 142, pp. 12–39, 2017.

[16] McCay, L., Designing mental health into cities. Urban Design Group Journal, 142, pp. 25–27, 2017.

[17] Crappsley, R., Designing streets for good health: now and in the future. Urban Design Group Journal, 143, pp. 10–11, 2017.

[18] Taylor, A.F., Wiley, A., Kuo, F.E. & Sullivan, W.C., Growing up in the inner city: Green spaces as places to grow, Environmental Behavior, 30(1), pp. 3–27, 1998. https://doi. org/10.1177/0013916598301001

[19] Zidansek, A., Sustainable development and happiness in nations. Energy, 32(6), pp. 891–897, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.09.016

[20] Montgomery, C., Happy City, Penguin: London, 2013.

[21] Burns, G.W., Naturally happy, naturally healthy: The role of natural environment in well-being. The Science of Well-Being, eds. F.A. Huppert, N. Baylis & B. Keverne, Oxford University Press: New York, 2005.

[22] Ballas, D., What makes a ‘happy city’? Cities, 32, pp. S39–S50, 2013. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.04.009

[23] Burns, G.W., Naturally happy, naturally healthy: The role of natural environment in well-being. The Science of Well-Being, eds. F.A. Huppert, N. Baylis & B. Keverne, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2005.

[24] Burton, L., Mental well-being. The Routledge Handbook for Health and Well-Being, eds. H. Barton, S. Thompson, S. Burgess & M. Grant, London: Routledge, 2015.

[25] Kyttä, M., Broberg, A., Haybatollahi, M. & Schmidt-Thomé, K., Urban happiness: context-sensitive study of the social sustainability of urban settings. Environment and Planning B, 43(1), pp. 34–57, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813515600121

[26] Sepe, M., Improving sustainable enhancement of cultural heritage: smart placemaking for experiential paths in Pompeii. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 10(5), pp. 713–733, 2015. https://doi.org/10.2495/sdp-v10-n5-713-733

[27] City of Vancouver, https://vancouver.ca (accessed 20 November 2018).

[28] Delgado, J.P., Waterfront: The Illustrated Maritime History of Greater Vancouver, Stanton Atkins, Dosil Publishers, Vancouver, 2010.

[29] Pyky, R., Neuvonen, M., Kangas, K., Ojala, A., Lanki, T., Borodulin, K. & Tyrväinen, L., Individual and environmental factors associated with green exercise in urban and suburban areas. Health and Place, 55, pp. 20–28. (accessed 17 November 2018).

[30] Mathewson, D. & Karaga, K., Vancouver as a benchmark. Urban Design Group Journal, 145, pp. 25–27, 2018.